"Who are our enemies? Who are our friends?" Mao Zedong (
Fear of enemies and the need to destroy them remains overpowering among Mao's heirs. It explains their imprisonment of members of the tiny Democratic Party; of Catholics loyal to Rome; of Protestants, Buddhists, and Muslims who resist supervision by the party's Patriotic Church; the oppression of Tibet and the hunting down of the millions of adherents of Falun Gong. Bei-jing's leaders justify persecution by linking supposed internal enemies to "outside forces" seeking to bring down Communist rule by "smokeless warfare." If they fail to crush their enemies, it is claimed, China's fragile stability will shatter and the country will be plunged into chaos.
This fear infects foreign China-watchers too. A bomb explosion in some city or peasant riot causes these specialists to heat up the Internet with queries about whether this bomb or that riot threatens the survival of the Communist Party.
No one interprets the regime's fear of instability and the hunt for enemies better than Liu Binyan (劉賓雁), China's best-known inves-tigative reporter, political prisoner for 22 years, ex-Party member and an exile in the US, where he teaches at Princeton. "Actually," says Liu, "what disrupts unity and stability is the leadership's own political performance ... they have made the Chinese people lose confidence in the socialist system and the future of the nation. ... Some people take the law into their own hands ... gunshots, bombings, arson and railway derailments are a form of revenge for the injured and the oppressed."
Many foreigners observe that China is no longer a place of constant Maoist persecution. They speak of how eagerly acquaintances and taxi drivers curse the regime, including the corruption of the leaders and their offspring. The outpouring of publications, including pornography, is cited as a sign of press freedom. Yet nothing is permitted which can be interpreted as organized resistance to the regime -- especially if connected to the US, condemned as the source of the "bourgeois liberalism" which the government most fears.
The roots of this "enemy hunt" lie in the time when the party was officially founded in 1921, with help from the Moscow-directed Comintern. This meant immediate infection by the core Leninist/Stalinist conviction that enemies must be eliminated, and if not killed, made to vanish from the record.
In Shanghai, visitors to the building where the founding of the party is said to have taken place are shown photographs doctored to eliminate founders who became traitors. Photographs of Mao's funeral in 1976 initially showed his widow in mourning but within a few weeks of her arrest as a member of the Gang of Four the photographs were republished with the widow and the rest of the gang airbrushed down the memory-hole. At various times Mao and Deng Xiaoping (
From the beginning of his assent to party leadership in the early 1930s, Mao showed a taste for the blood of his adversaries. Survivors, especially the widows of those executed as counter-revolutionaries, recall the pervasive fear at his guerrilla headquarters at Yanan. During the years before the 1949 victory, according to party historian Dai Qing (戴晴), Mao's alleged enemies were accused of Trotskyism -- a useful justification inherited from Stalin -- and were shot, beheaded, or buried alive by the hundreds.
After 1949, the enemy-hunt persisted, with successive campaigns against landlords, "right-ists," "stinking intellectuals," and "capitalist-roaders," and finally the millions of "opponents of Mao" in the 1966 to 1976 Cultural Revolution. Researching that decade one can hardly discover a school in which teachers were not tortured and killed by their pupils.
In 1989 came Tiananmen, or rather the almost 100 Tiananmens throughout China, where citizens called for moderate reforms. Tens if not hundreds of thousands of people across the country were arrested. The government still treats as semi-criminals the parents of students shot dead in Tiananmen.
The party fears its own past. Its begetters, a tiny group of
conspirators, harassed by their enemies, and often at odds among themselves, scrambled through civil war and Japanese invasion to seize power. If mistakes were made, the victims, even if dead, could be "rehabilitated" later -- and with official absolution: "The party makes mistakes, but only the party can correct them."
During the Cultural Revolu-tion, Mao established a committee to deal with those who "opposed the chairman." Hundreds of polit-buro, central committee, and senior party members and perhaps 2 million others were "examined." In prison, their every act was recorded. According to official documents these included "raising their legs, lifting their arms ... eating, drinking, defecating, urinating, gnashing their teeth ... burping, laughing, sighing ... talking in their sleep."
The committee's meetings were chaired by Premier Zhou Enlai (
Jonathan Mirsky is the author of numerous books on China and a former East Asia editor of The Times of London.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
US President Donald Trump created some consternation in Taiwan last week when he told a news conference that a successful trade deal with China would help with “unification.” Although the People’s Republic of China has never ruled Taiwan, Trump’s language struck a raw nerve in Taiwan given his open siding with Russian President Vladimir Putin’s aggression seeking to “reunify” Ukraine and Russia. On earlier occasions, Trump has criticized Taiwan for “stealing” the US’ chip industry and for relying too much on the US for defense, ominously presaging a weakening of US support for Taiwan. However, further examination of Trump’s remarks in
It is being said every second day: The ongoing recall campaign in Taiwan — where citizens are trying to collect enough signatures to trigger re-elections for a number of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — is orchestrated by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), or even President William Lai (賴清德) himself. The KMT makes the claim, and foreign media and analysts repeat it. However, they never show any proof — because there is not any. It is alarming how easily academics, journalists and experts toss around claims that amount to accusing a democratic government of conspiracy — without a shred of evidence. These
China on May 23, 1951, imposed the so-called “17-Point Agreement” to formally annex Tibet. In March, China in its 18th White Paper misleadingly said it laid “firm foundations for the region’s human rights cause.” The agreement is invalid in international law, because it was signed under threat. Ngapo Ngawang Jigme, head of the Tibetan delegation sent to China for peace negotiations, was not authorized to sign the agreement on behalf of the Tibetan government and the delegation was made to sign it under duress. After seven decades, Tibet remains intact and there is global outpouring of sympathy for Tibetans. This realization
RSS