Today the KMT is to get down to the serious part of its congress, elections for its 210-member Central Committee and 31-seat Central Standing Committee. The elections for the Central Standing Committee (CSC) in particular are important because they provide an indication of the party's ability to reform itself.
The party held an Extraordinary National Congress in June last year in the wake of its election defeat which was a triumph for party solidarity and the status quo and a disaster for any chance the party might have had to reform itself. Five vice chairpersons were elected and a new CSC and, unfortunately, all these senior positions were filled with the same old party hacks we, and almost everyone else in Taiwan, long ago became tired of. What we should have seen was a party which, repudiated at the polls, was finding within that crisis the opportunity to dump some outdated political baggage and begin to redesign policy in accord with what the people of Taiwan actually wanted -- and it says much about the KMT that this would have been such a radical departure. What we in fact saw was the same pompous asses that ran Lien Chan's (
It was indicative of the KMT's brain-dead state that Lien, the man whose ineptness as a candidate lost the election for the party, was confirmed as acting party chairman last June. That Lien was elected chairman by the party membership in March this year was also a triumph of the traditional KMT virtue of loyalty over the common sense that tells us Lien is a loser, people don't like him and won't -- in fact didn't -- vote for him. But that Lien was elected as chairman in an election rigged to exclude other candidates, showed just how incapable of reform the party was.
Something along the same lines is set to be repeated tomorrow where the party chairman submits to the congress the list of CSC members he recommends and they are, inevitably, voted in. It could be, of course, that Lien has had the courage and the intelligence to bring new blood, with maybe some innovative thinking, into the CSC but the auguries are not good.
Time to write the KMT off as a lost cause, then? Perhaps not. Lien is about as out of touch with his electorate as it is possible to be. But obviously there are still some people with a better sense of what will play to the voters of Peikang than he who can still make their opinions felt. The decision not to include Lien's nonsensical "confederation" reunification model as part of the party's official platform shows that someone is still awake. Of course one swallow doesn't make a summer and one reasonably intelligent decision does not make a smart election strategy.
And of course Lien might not -- in fact almost certainly will not -- always listen. Even on the "confederation" he displayed headstrong stubbornness yesterday, which suggests that while he may listen to good advice, sometimes it is only with extreme reluctance that he can dismount a favorite hobby horse. There having been an agreement not to put the confederation idea into the KMT's platform, Lien just couldn't resist telling everyone what a wonderful formula it was. Stubborn, vain, impetuous, obviously lacking in political savvy, the amazing thing about Lien is that he has come so far and that the KMT isn't in revolt against the liability its leader poses.
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
They did it again. For the whole world to see: an image of a Taiwan flag crushed by an industrial press, and the horrifying warning that “it’s closer than you think.” All with the seal of authenticity that only a reputable international media outlet can give. The Economist turned what looks like a pastiche of a poster for a grim horror movie into a truth everyone can digest, accept, and use to support exactly the opinion China wants you to have: It is over and done, Taiwan is doomed. Four years after inaccurately naming Taiwan the most dangerous place on
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
President William Lai (賴清德) recently attended an event in Taipei marking the end of World War II in Europe, emphasizing in his speech: “Using force to invade another country is an unjust act and will ultimately fail.” In just a few words, he captured the core values of the postwar international order and reminded us again: History is not just for reflection, but serves as a warning for the present. From a broad historical perspective, his statement carries weight. For centuries, international relations operated under the law of the jungle — where the strong dominated and the weak were constrained. That