Every nation in the world is striving to boost its economy at the moment. But the method Taiwan is using to rescue its economy is unique.
While those in power worldwide are responsible for coming up with effective solutions, those in power in Taiwan are holding an Economic Development Advisory Conference -- so that all the parties can be involved in coming up with solutions. While other nations are working with full vigor and urgency to save their economies, the DPP government is wasting a month or two by holding endless preparatory meetings in order to "reach a democratic consensus" on how to hold its economic conference.
To save the US economy, President George W. Bush, after being in power for a little more than 100 days, proposed a large tax cut which will exceed US$1 trillion over the next 10 years. The proposal was swiftly passed and put into effect. This major tax reduction proposal was drafted entirely by Bush's financial and economic aides. The proposal won wide support among a bi-partisan majority, even though Bush had not called a cross-party economic conference.
To save Japan's economy, Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi has proposed a national economic reform scheme, just two months after coming to power. His plan focuses on structural reforms, including helping the banking industry reduce approximately ?60 trillion worth of bad debts and cutting medical benefits for the elderly. Like Bush's proposal, Koizumi's reform plan was drafted entirely by his aides. Despite Japan's deeply rooted factional politics, most members of parliament are expected to support the plan.
Bush is a minority president. Although Koizumi is an extremely popular prime minister, he faces a parliament tightly controlled by factions. If we go by Taiwan's logic of holding conferences to seek consensus, wouldn't it be more important for the US and Japan to call large-scale conferences and seek consensus before proposing any reform plan than for Taiwan to do so? Holding such conferences is apparently not a prerequisite to boosting the economy.
Taiwan's politicians, however, have always been obsessed with large-scale gatherings, as if the world would be at peace once such a conference were held. The KMT had this obsession when it was trying to present a democratic facade. The obsession did not disappear after the DPP took office; instead, it worsened.
Consensus is indispensable in a democratic society. Politicians always talk about consensus. However, they are mistaken if they believe that there can be no reforms without consensus -- they have completely misunderstood the meaning of consensus-building and methods to exercise reforms.
If those in power wish to achieve a consensus on reform between the ruling and the opposition camps, they must develop clear views on reforms first. Both Bush and Koizumi, for example, have proposed their reform plans based on their views. Without such views, conferences called to seek a consensus may appear democratic, but they may in fact lead to a fake consensus, a compromise. A fake consensus will lead to fake reforms.
Taiwan has to get down to business now to save its domestic economy. The upcoming cross-party economic conference is neither necessary nor an effective method to stimulate our economy. If President Chen Shui-bian (
Wang Chien-chuang is president of The Journalist magazine.
Translated by Eddy Chang
They did it again. For the whole world to see: an image of a Taiwan flag crushed by an industrial press, and the horrifying warning that “it’s closer than you think.” All with the seal of authenticity that only a reputable international media outlet can give. The Economist turned what looks like a pastiche of a poster for a grim horror movie into a truth everyone can digest, accept, and use to support exactly the opinion China wants you to have: It is over and done, Taiwan is doomed. Four years after inaccurately naming Taiwan the most dangerous place on
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
President William Lai (賴清德) recently attended an event in Taipei marking the end of World War II in Europe, emphasizing in his speech: “Using force to invade another country is an unjust act and will ultimately fail.” In just a few words, he captured the core values of the postwar international order and reminded us again: History is not just for reflection, but serves as a warning for the present. From a broad historical perspective, his statement carries weight. For centuries, international relations operated under the law of the jungle — where the strong dominated and the weak were constrained. That
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
RSS