New Party legislator Elmer Feng (馮滬祥) has claimed he was asked by President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) to convey messages to China on cross-strait policy and that, during the period in which he supposedly did so, Chen Che-nan (陳哲男), deputy secretary general of the Presidential Office, made 12 visits to Feng's office at the president's behest.
Feng also claimed that he and Chen had talked about President Chen's plan to accept the "one China principle," about "convening the National Unification Council" within three months, recognizing the "1992 consen-sus" to pave the way for the "three links" and laying stress on what they called "integration" -- in other words, unification.
It is interesting that Feng said that he wasn't a secret envoy, but only a cross-strait "communicator." But if everything Feng said is true, then his role was even more secret than the secret envoy role played by Su Chih-cheng (
This is a matter of Taiwan's future. To be honest, even if the president wanted to do these things, he wouldn't necessarily have the guts to; and even if he did, he wouldn't necessarily have the authority. It is even less likely that such serious "promises" would be conveyed by a third party such as Chen Che-nan. Though Feng speaks with an air of certainty, his audience can't help but feel his statements are just too much to be believed.
Furthermore, if Taiwan was ready to make concessions and recognize the one China principle, then things like the 1992 consensus or National Unification Council wouldn't even be worth mentioning. If Chen really wanted to "surrender," would he show all of his bargaining chips? True, for Chen to reveal his hand is exactly what both China and Feng want, but it is something that not even an idiot would attempt. As for Feng's statements, he is probably the only one who believes them. They aren't plausible even to the Chinese government.
An even more obvious point of course is that, just as Feng said, he wasn't a secret envoy, nor was he a communicator, but rather a "messenger of surren-der" carrying a statement of surrender to Beijing. But would just a messenger have been granted an audience with just Vice Premier Qian Qichen (
Still, Feng's self-agrandizing mumblings can be compared to Chin Hui-chu's (
Chin Heng-wei is editor in chief of Contemporary Monthly magazine.
Translated by Scudder Smith
In a meeting with Haitian Minister of Foreign Affairs Jean-Victor Harvel Jean-Baptiste on Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) vowed to continue providing aid to Haiti. Taiwan supports Haiti with development in areas such as agriculture, healthcare and education through initiatives run by the Taiwan International Cooperation and Development Fund (ICDF). The nation it has established itself as a responsible, peaceful and innovative actor committed to global cooperation, Jean-Baptiste said. Testimonies such as this give Taiwan a voice in the global community, where it often goes unheard. Taiwan’s reception in Haiti also contrasts with how China has been perceived in countries in the region
On Monday, Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) delivered a welcome speech at the ILA-ASIL Asia-Pacific Research Forum, addressing more than 50 international law experts from more than 20 countries. With an aim to refute the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) claim to be the successor to the 1945 Chinese government and its assertion that China acquired sovereignty over Taiwan, Lin articulated three key legal positions in his speech: First, the Cairo Declaration and Potsdam Declaration were not legally binding instruments and thus had no legal effect for territorial disposition. All determinations must be based on the San Francisco Peace
On April 13, I stood in Nanan (南安), a Bunun village in southern Hualien County’s Jhuosi Township (卓溪), absorbing lessons from elders who spoke of the forest not as backdrop, but as living presence — relational, sacred and full of spirit. I was there with fellow international students from National Dong Hwa University (NDHU) participating in a field trip that would become one of the most powerful educational experiences of my life. Ten days later, a news report in the Taipei Times shattered the spell: “Formosan black bear shot and euthanized in Hualien” (April 23, page 2). A tagged bear, previously released
While global headlines often focus on the military balance in the Taiwan Strait or the promise of US intervention, there is a quieter, less visible battle that might ultimately define Taiwan’s future: the battle for intelligence autonomy. Despite widespread global adherence to the “one China” policy, Taiwan has steadily cultivated a unique political identity and security strategy grounded in self-reliance. This approach is not merely symbolic; it is a pragmatic necessity in the face of Beijing’s growing political warfare and infiltration campaigns, many orchestrated by the Chinese Ministry of State Security (MSS). Taiwan’s intelligence community did not emerge overnight. Its roots
RSS