Before George W. Bush was elected president of the US, governor of Texas was the only work experience listed on his political resume. Moreover, he only served one-and-a-half terms as governor, which means he had a total of about six years of political experience before entering the White House.
This political greenhorn, however, is now leader of the last remaining superpower and is playing his role well. Not only did he not describe himself or his new administration as a "small tree" -- as President Chen Shui-bian (
On May 18, New York Times columnist Thomas L. Friedman said that three facts about the Bush administration could yet conspire to produce "a perfect political storm."
One, the Bush administration came into office with the attitude that everything the Clinton administration did was wrong and needed to be reversed.
Two, they came into office bearing Republican "theological" positions on tax cuts, the environment and missile defense, positions that had not been tested in the real world over the past eight years.
Three, they came into office controlling the Senate, the House, the White House and the Supreme Court, creating a government with no brakes (even though the defection of James Jeffords has now changed the situation in the Senate).
Because there are no brakes, the Bush administration, which has been in office for only a little more than 100 days, geared up and marched ahead at full speed from the very beginning. To deal with the economic downturn, a large tax cut has already been proposed. To deal with the growing energy crisis, the previous administration's pro-conservation energy policy has been largely overturned. On the defense side, the administration would rather spend US$100 billion building a Star Wars missile shield than spend US$100 million dealing with an immediate threat by assisting Russia with the dismantling of its old nuclear weapons which could fall into the hands of terrorists.
Thus, in contrast to former president Bill Clinton, who adopted a "middle way," Bush is a national leader with a distinct political stance. His governing style is also vastly different from that of Clinton, who tried to please everybody.
In fact, Clinton was controlled by the Democratic Party's left wing when he first took office. Two years later, former speaker of the House, Newt Gingrich, launched a "Republican revolution" and forced him to shift back and to adopt the "Third Way." As for Bush, he is now following the path of the extreme Republican right. Friedman described Bush's current policies as nothing but a "realism lost in theology." He also predicted that if Bush and his administration keep going in the radical direction in which they are headed, "at the speed they are traveling, they are going to hit something real hard."
Chen is about the same age as Clinton and Bush. All three were led by the "theologies" of their parties when they first took office. Clinton quickly abandoned the party's ideology by adopting a "middle way." Bush, however, has chosen to uphold the party's ideology and is rushing to the right. Not only has the so-called Third Way become a thing of the past, but the term cannot even be found in Bush's political dictionary.
But whether Chen will take Clinton or Bush as his guide, or whether he will disregard the shortcomings of the two and allow only their strengths to serve as examples to him, he should learn the following lesson from the two Americans: governing means making choices! Governance without making choices is simply empty rule.
A national leader who doesn't dare to make choices will keep running around to the point of exhaustion. This is not true leadership and such a leader will be unable to govern a state well. This was former US president Richard Nixon's advice to Clinton. After being in power for one year, perhaps A-bian should take that advice too.
Wang Chien-chuang is president of 'The Journalist' magazine. Translated by Eddy Chang
US President Donald Trump last week told reporters that he had signed about 12 letters to US trading partners, which were set to be sent out yesterday, levying unilateral tariff rates of up to 70 percent from Aug. 1. However, Trump did not say which countries the letters would be sent to, nor did he discuss the specific tariff rates, reports said. The news of the tariff letters came as Washington and Hanoi reached a trade deal earlier last week to cut tariffs on Vietnamese exports to the US to 20 percent from 46 percent, making it the first Asian country
Life as we know it will probably not come to an end in Japan this weekend, but what if it does? That is the question consuming a disaster-prone country ahead of a widely spread prediction of disaster that one comic book suggests would occur tomorrow. The Future I Saw, a manga by Ryo Tatsuki about her purported ability to see the future in dreams, was first published in 1999. It would have faded into obscurity, but for the mention of a tsunami and the cover that read “Major disaster in March 2011.” Years later, when the most powerful earthquake ever
Chinese intimidation of Taiwan has entered a chilling new phase: bolder, more multifaceted and unconstrained by diplomatic norms. For years, Taiwan has weathered economic coercion, military threats, diplomatic isolation, political interference, espionage and disinformation, but the direct targeting of elected leaders abroad signals an alarming escalation in Beijing’s campaign of hostility. Czech military intelligence recently uncovered a plot that reads like fiction, but is all too real. Chinese diplomats and civil secret service in Prague had planned to ram the motorcade of then-vice president-elect Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴) and physically assault her during her visit to the Czech Republic in March last
As things heated up in the Middle East in early June, some in the Pentagon resisted American involvement in the Israel-Iran war because it would divert American attention and resources from the real challenge: China. This was exactly wrong. Rather, bombing Iran was the best thing that could have happened for America’s Asia policy. When it came to dealing with the Iranian nuclear program, “all options are on the table” had become an American mantra over the past two decades. But the more often US administration officials insisted that military force was in the cards, the less anyone believed it. After
RSS