On Friday, the 82nd anniversary of the "May 4 Movement" (
The incident serves only to display the lawmakers' ignorance of history. The original "May 4 Movement" in Beijing protested the aggression of major foreign powers and voiced demands for "democracy and science."
If Taiwan is to truly launch a "New May 4 Movement," it should rightly be against Taiwan's biggest external threat -- China. After all, China is the country that has done everything imaginable to drive Taiwan out of the international arena. Wasn't it just a fortnight ago that China tried to bully Japan into refusing Lee Teng-hui's (
A no-confidence vote right now would contradict the demands for "democracy" of the original "May 4 Movement" and run counter to popular will. Even at the height of discontent with the DPP administration during the row over the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant (
Perhaps realizing the public rage that a no-confidence vote would invite, KMT Secretary-general Lin Feng-cheng (林豐正) indicated that his party has no immediate intention of calling for the vote. Given that they want to maintain their stranglehold on the legislature following the year-end elections, KMT leaders must have sweated profusely over Pan's outburst.
What's more, the word is out that some KMT lawmakers -- feeling disillusioned with the party's increasingly pro-China stance -- are secretly plotting to defect and join forces with lawmakers who care more about their own country than kowtowing to their belligerent neighbor. Speculation has it that they are waiting until after the election to defect -- and possibly form a new party -- as they need the KMT's financial backing to retain their current seats. In light of this, risking moving the election forward with a vote of no confidence could prove suicidal.
Obviously the KMT has been trying win back the hearts of these potential "defectors" before the election takes place. If the election is moved up, then the KMT would lose the time needed to do so.
Moreover, if a no-confidence vote is cast against the premier over a sagging world economy, many other nations would likewise have to change their governments, for they are not expected to fare any better in the near-term. For example, the predicted unemployment rates of the US and France this year are more than 4.5 percent and 8 percent respectively. A recent IMF report predicts that Taiwan's economic growth for the year will be 4.1 percent, a figure far better than those of many other countries. In fact, the average growth rate worldwide is expected to be only 3.1 percent.
We are not suggesting the government should completely evade responsibility for the island's economic woes, but we hope that the opposition parties do not aggravate the situation by stirring up political and economic instability by constantly waging empty threats against the government.
Chinese state-owned companies COSCO Shipping Corporation and China Merchants have a 30 percent stake in Kaohsiung Port’s Kao Ming Container Terminal (Terminal No. 6) and COSCO leases Berths 65 and 66. It is extremely dangerous to allow Chinese companies or state-owned companies to operate critical infrastructure. Deterrence theorists are familiar with the concepts of deterrence “by punishment” and “by denial.” Deterrence by punishment threatens an aggressor with prohibitive costs (like retaliation or sanctions) that outweigh the benefits of their action, while deterrence by denial aims to make an attack so difficult that it becomes pointless. Elbridge Colby, currently serving as the Under
The Ministry of the Interior on Thursday last week said it ordered Internet service providers to block access to Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu (小紅書, also known as RedNote in English) for a year, citing security risks and more than 1,700 alleged fraud cases on the platform since last year. The order took effect immediately, abruptly affecting more than 3 million users in Taiwan, and sparked discussions among politicians, online influencers and the public. The platform is often described as China’s version of Instagram or Pinterest, combining visual social media with e-commerce, and its users are predominantly young urban women,
Most Hong Kongers ignored the elections for its Legislative Council (LegCo) in 2021 and did so once again on Sunday. Unlike in 2021, moderate democrats who pledged their allegiance to Beijing were absent from the ballots this year. The electoral system overhaul is apparent revenge by Beijing for the democracy movement. On Sunday, the Hong Kong “patriots-only” election of the LegCo had a record-low turnout in the five geographical constituencies, with only 1.3 million people casting their ballots on the only seats that most Hong Kongers are eligible to vote for. Blank and invalid votes were up 50 percent from the previous
Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi lit a fuse the moment she declared that trouble for Taiwan means trouble for Japan. Beijing roared, Tokyo braced and like a plot twist nobody expected that early in the story, US President Donald Trump suddenly picked up the phone to talk to her. For a man who normally prefers to keep Asia guessing, the move itself was striking. What followed was even more intriguing. No one outside the room knows the exact phrasing, the tone or the diplomatic eyebrow raises exchanged, but the broad takeaway circulating among people familiar with the call was this: Trump did