About a month ago a Taipei policeman branded the characters "yeh-mao" (
Most people would suspect the policeman of being psychologically unstable, to say the least. The question then becomes how did his problems escape detection? How did he manage to join and stay in the police force? Don't members of the Taipei police have to undergo psychological evaluations upon joining the force and periodically thereafter? It would be worrying if the answer were no. Due to the enormous power vested in police officers and the high stress of fighting crime, the police of many countries, if not most, undergo such evaluations.
The stress of the police officer's job is unimaginable. For most people, murder, rape, child-abuse and other crimes are no more than stories we read over the morning coffee. They are part of a police officer's everyday life. The police are on society's frontlines and they put their lives at risk everyday. Many officers, unable to cope, end up with psychological problems or resort to alcohol abuse, family violence and, all too often, suicide.
Because the police have a great deal of power, it is all to easy to succumb to the temptation to abuse those powers. The police are also armed, making them capable of inflicting grave injuries. Therefore, careful pre-screenings must be made to filter out those with mental or emotional problems and periodic assessments must be conducted to ensure only those who are psychologically sound stay on board.
The most appalling thing about the branding case is that the cop in question remained on active duty for about a month after the incident, even after his victim filed a complaint against him. This hints not only of a possible attempted cover-up, but of an indifference about what further harm the officer might inflict on others.
It remains unclear whether the teen had, as alleged by the policeman, solicited another man over the phone. Even if she did, though, that was no excuse for his actions. The cop said he decided not to take the girl in, because she did not want her parents and school to find out. What makes this policeman think that he has the power to decide such a thing?
Unfortunately, the policeman may have only been doing what his comrades continue to do -- act as prosecutor and judge themselves. Wasn't it only recently that two Taipei policemen tried to settle matters privately with a TV producer who had assaulted them while they were on duty?
It shouldn't matter that the policemen was off-duty when the assault occurred. It shouldn't matter that the teen accepted the "punishment" without resisting. It shouldn't matter that the officer reached a private settlement with the girl and her family.
There is no way the Taipei police can escape responsibility. That the officer thought he could get away with it, that the girl was both intimidated by and accepting of such abuse, speaks volumes about the need to clean up the force. Such an overhaul, however, should not be restricted to Taipei. Just because we might not have heard of such incidents from other cities, towns, or counties doesn't mean that it can't happen.
The police have been branded with a scarlet letter of their own -- "A" for abuser. It is up to the National Police Administration and society at large to ensure that such abuse of power ends.
As the war in Burma stretches into its 76th year, China continues to play both sides. Beijing backs the junta, which seized power in the 2021 coup, while also funding some of the resistance groups fighting the regime. Some suggest that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) is hedging his bets, positioning China to side with the victors regardless of the outcome. However, a more accurate explanation is that China is acting pragmatically to safeguard its investments and ensure the steady flow of natural resources and energy for its economy. China’s primary interest is stability and supporting the junta initially seemed like the best
The US election result will significantly impact its foreign policy with global implications. As tensions escalate in the Taiwan Strait and conflicts elsewhere draw attention away from the western Pacific, Taiwan was closely monitoring the election, as many believe that whoever won would confront an increasingly assertive China, especially with speculation over a potential escalation in or around 2027. A second Donald Trump presidency naturally raises questions concerning the future of US policy toward China and Taiwan, with Trump displaying mixed signals as to his position on the cross-strait conflict. US foreign policy would also depend on Trump’s Cabinet and
Numerous expert analyses characterize today’s US presidential election as a risk for Taiwan, given that the two major candidates, US Vice President Kamala Harris and former US president Donald Trump, are perceived to possess divergent foreign policy perspectives. If Harris is elected, many presume that the US would maintain its existing relationship with Taiwan, as established through the American Institute in Taiwan, and would continue to sell Taiwan weapons and equipment to help it defend itself against China. Under the administration of US President Joe Biden, whose political views Harris shares, the US on Oct. 25 authorized arms transfers to Taiwan, another
Navy Commander Admiral Tang Hua (唐華) said in an interview with The Economist that the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) has been implementing an “anaconda strategy” to subdue Taiwan since President William Lai (賴清德) assumed office. The Chinese military is “slowly, but surely” increasing its presence around Taiwan proper, it quoted Tang as saying. “They are ready to blockade Taiwan at any time they want,” he said. “They give you extreme pressure, pressure, pressure. They’re trying to exhaust you.” Beijing’s goal is to “force Taiwan to make mistakes,” Tang said, adding that they could be “excuses” for a blockade. The interview reminds me