Although he has been in the White House for only three months or so, US President George W. Bush has already suffered many domestic and external setbacks. In addition to Congress' criticisms of his tax plan and the public's doubts about his decision to launch an air strike against Iraq, the Bush administration's Asia policy has also invited serious debate, especially when it comes to relations with China.
Although he has been able to recruit some veteran Asia specialists to his administration, Bush currently faces growing pressures from home after his initial encounters with Chinese leaders. The recent mid-air collision over the South China Sea between a US surveillance plane carrying 24 crew members and a Chinese fighter jet on an intercept mission constitutes the greatest crisis so far for Bush, who used to be considered a rookie in major league politics.
While both Washington and Beijing point fingers at each other for causing the crash, the timing of the accident has in fact introduced a wild card into the sensitive triangular relationship between Washington, Beijing and Taipei. On the one hand, the incident threatens to damage China-US relations at a delicate time when Bush is weighing his strategy toward China and facing a crucial decision on whether to sell advanced weapons systems to Taiwan. Some argue that the longer the deadlock continues, the worse it will be for relations between China and the US. In that case, they argue, Taiwan will become the sole beneficiary of the Sino-US confrontation, as, in the face of China's reckless move toward military provocation, Washington may provide Taiwan with advanced weapons such as AEGIS-equipped destroyers and anti-submarine systems.
The above theory, however, overlooks the potential danger attending a deteriorating Sino-US relationship. Beijing's continuing deployment of missiles along its southeast coast and increases in its military budget have caused regional as well as international concern. As the annual US-Taiwan arms sales talks approach, the pro-Taiwan camp is increasing the pressure on Bush to sell more advanced weapons to Taipei. This collision incident will no doubt place further pressure on the Bush administration.
Whether or not Taiwan can benefit from a deterioration in Beijing-Washington relations remains uncertain. It is definitely not in Taiwan's interest, however, to see any standoff, or even military confrontation, between the US and China. Taiwan should carefully monitor the follow-up to the event and call for a peaceful resolution of the incident.
Even before the collision, Chinese officials were already highly sensitive to what they believed was a tougher US posture toward China -- one that viewed China as a military competitor first and a trade partner second. The first interactions between the new Bush administration and Chinese leaders have been difficult, marked by the recent defection to the US of a high-level Chinese army colonel, Xu Junping (徐俊平), and China's detention of visiting US-based Chinese academics.
Bush is facing a new diplomatic crisis before he has had a chance to meet his Chinese counterpart, President Jiang Zemin (江澤民), whom he is scheduled to meet in September. Bush has demanded a swift and safe return of the US surveillance plane. He had no choice but to take a cautious approach in tackling the crisis, although he was troubled by the lack of an immediate response from the Chinese government.
In this regard, Taipei should reiterate its position on US arms sales to Taiwan. That is, according to the Taiwan Relations Act and the Six Assurances, Washington must provide Taiwan with the weapons it needs to defend itself. Taiwan should not become a bargaining chip in a diplomatic wrangle.
During his meeting with Chinese Vice Premier Qian Qichen(
Nevertheless, the latest episode reveals several problems faced by the Bush administration. First and foremost is that a full team of Asia policymakers is not yet in place. Many personnel in the National Security Council, Department of Defense and State Department who will handle much of the nitty gritty work have not been appointed yet. The lack of integrated policy coordination poses an inherent danger to the administration. Since Bush pledged during the election campaign to engineer a new approach to China, it makes sense for the new administration to re-examine the current policy toward Taipei and Beijing. But before the Bush administration articulates a coherent Asia policy some time from now, it is imperative for the US to take an incremental approach to safeguard Taiwan's security, while at the same time maintaining a balance of power in the Asia-Pacific region.
Liu Kuan-teh is a Taipei-based political commentator.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Former minister of culture Lung Ying-tai (龍應台) has long wielded influence through the power of words. Her articles once served as a moral compass for a society in transition. However, as her April 1 guest article in the New York Times, “The Clock Is Ticking for Taiwan,” makes all too clear, even celebrated prose can mislead when romanticism clouds political judgement. Lung crafts a narrative that is less an analysis of Taiwan’s geopolitical reality than an exercise in wistful nostalgia. As political scientists and international relations academics, we believe it is crucial to correct the misconceptions embedded in her article,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which