Before talks with US officials recently, Chinese Vice Premier Qian Qichen (
When Taiwan abolished the Temporary Provisions Effective During the Period of Communist Rebellion (動員戡亂時期臨時條款), the government declared that it would not initiate a war against China. In contrast, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has repeatedly made military threats against Taiwan, saying such things as "there will inevitably be a war [in the Taiwan Strait] within five years," "it's either unification or war" and "smash and rebuild Taiwan."(
China and Taiwan are only one Taiwan Strait apart, while the US is much further away. Beijing therefore poses a greater threat to Taiwan than to the US. Although the US is a superpower, People's Liberation Army Deputy Chief of Staff Xiong Guangkai (熊光楷), actually threatened to launch nuclear missiles at Los Angeles a few years ago. The threat irritated the Americans. Qian's recent remarks about a preemptive strike against Taiwan simply reveal the CCP's true colors once again.
Beijing's nervous reaction and repeated denials and explanations following the US media's publication of Qian's words tell us that Beijing knows only to pick on the weak.
In view of the uproar over Qian's alleged remarks, the Chinese government immediately denied the allegation through "an authoritative figure close to Qian" the very next day, indicating the PRC leadership's concerns about incurring the wrath of the Bush administration and jeopardizing Beijing's plan to forge an alliance with the US. The "authoritative figure" clearly said that "even if the US approves the sales of four advanced AEGIS-equipped destroyers to Taiwan, Beijing will not invade Taiwan."
Meanwhile, upon inquiries about Qian's previous remarks and after Qian's talks with US Secretary of State Colin Powell, China's Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokeswoman, Zhang Qiyue (章啟月), explained that Qian had simply said that if the US government decided to sell the warships to Taiwan, the decision would be harmful to peace in the Taiwan Strait. Plus, although Qian repeatedly referred to the "August 17" communique (八一七公報) -- signed by former US president Ronald Reagan in 1982 -- Zhang particularly avoided mentioning the communique's restrictions on US arms sales to Taiwan.
As the PRC government appears to be trying its best to avoid using words and phrases such as "weapons" and "military force," is it trying to play the role of pacifist? Subsequently, Qian himself told CNN, upon being questioned about the possibility of a preemptive strike against Taiwan, that, "It really depends," showing that he has not yet given up his idea.
Qian is famous for his tough stances on foreign affairs and Taiwan policy. When accompanying Chinese President Jiang Zemin (江澤民) during visits to the US in the past, Qian has gone as far as repeatedly "correcting" Jiang's flattering remarks about the US. Facing changes in the US administration and the US' China and Taiwan policies, Qian is trying to bully Bush in the manner in which he used to bully Clinton. Qian's superiors seem a lot more practical than him, and to have a much better understanding of how to deal with the US government.
Paul Lin is a political commentator on Hong Kong affairs currently living in the US.
Translated by Eddy Chang
From the Iran war and nuclear weapons to tariffs and artificial intelligence, the agenda for this week’s Beijing summit between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) is packed. Xi would almost certainly bring up Taiwan, if only to demonstrate his inflexibility on the matter. However, no one needs to meet with Xi face-to-face to understand his stance. A visit to the National Museum of China in Beijing — in particular, the “Road to Rejuvenation” exhibition, which chronicles the rise and rule of the Chinese Communist Party — might be even more revealing. Xi took the members
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) on Friday used their legislative majority to push their version of a special defense budget bill to fund the purchase of US military equipment, with the combined spending capped at NT$780 billion (US$24.78 billion). The bill, which fell short of the Executive Yuan’s NT$1.25 trillion request, was passed by a 59-0 margin with 48 abstentions in the 113-seat legislature. KMT Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文), who reportedly met with TPP Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) for a private meeting before holding a joint post-vote news conference, was said to have mobilized her
The inter-Korean relationship, long defined by national division, offers the clearest mirror within East Asia for cross-strait relations. Yet even there, reunification language is breaking down. The South Korean government disclosed on Wednesday last week that North Korea’s constitutional revision in March had deleted references to reunification and added a territorial clause defining its border with South Korea. South Korea is also seriously debating whether national reunification with North Korea is still necessary. On April 27, South Korean President Lee Jae-myung marked the eighth anniversary of the Panmunjom Declaration, the 2018 inter-Korean agreement in which the two Koreas pledged to
I wrote this before US President Donald Trump embarked on his uneventful state visit to China on Thursday. So, I shall confine my observations to the joint US-Philippine military exercise of April 20 through May 8, known collectively as “Balikatan 2026.” This year’s Balikatan was notable for its “firsts.” First, it was conducted primarily with Taiwan in mind, not the Philippines or even the South China Sea. It also showed that in the Pacific, America’s alliance network is still robust. Allies are enthusiastic about America’s renewed leadership in the region. Nine decades ago, in 1936, America had neither military strength
RSS