It was not long ago that Taiwan emerged from the political battle which raged for more than three months over the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant
The unprecedented "Category 3A" accident that occurred at the Third Nuclear Power Plant (核三) in Pingtung on Sunday morning -- Taiwan's worst nuclear plant accident -- finally sounded the alarms that three tumultuous months of political wrangling failed to do. When environmental groups reiterated their doubts about the safety of nuclear power during the uproar over the fourth plant, Taipower officials, with straight faces, guaranteed that the odds of a nuclear accident were almost nil, citing the multi-layer safety designs of the plants. Sunday's accident occurred when Taipower's assurances were still echoing in our ears -- an indication that safety designs do not necessarily translate into safe operations.
The accident has been attributed to salty deposits on electric transmission lines that caused two generators to shut down. Two diesel-powered generators that were supposed to power the reactors' cooling systems during emergencies also failed to function. The temperature in the reactors began to rise, melting some steel plates. Fortunately, a third diesel-powered generator was hauled and hooked-up, just in time to prevent a nuclear disaster.
Investigators have yet to file a report on the accident, but the information available at this point indicates serious negligence on the part of Taipower and plant staff. First of all, salty deposits have always been a problem in coastal areas. Short circuits caused by such deposits are not rare occurrences. In fact, Taipower had discovered the problem on Saturday and planned a clean-up the next day. The accident came just before the clean-up was to start. Obviously, the shutdown could have been avoided if Taipower had done a solid job of regular maintenance or kept a more vigilant eye on the equipment.
The fact that Taipower workers failed to connect the two diesel-powered generators into the reactors' cooling systems -- and even started a fire in the process -- is totally unforgivable. All nuclear power plants have layers and layers of safety equipment. Whenever a shutdown occurs, the diesel-powered generators should be able to start running immediately. The fact that a reactor shutdown developed into a "Category 3A" accident is a clear indication of Taipower's laxity, negligence and, dare we say it, incompetence.
Taipower has been able to evade external supervision because of its special monopoly status. As a result, it relies solely on internal controls. Disaster can result when those controls fail to function. This is the main reason why environmental groups and academia cannot bring themselves to trust Taipower, and why the people of Taiwan should now loudly demand a major overhaul in the way the nuclear plants are run and administered.
The company should learn quickly from Saturday's lesson and change its corporate culture. It should allow an academic organization to supervise and evaluate its operations, to ensure that it will have a multi-layer safety operations system just as its reactors do. Even though the fourth plant will have a far better safety system than the third one, the Atomic Energy Council still needs to impose very strict standards on Taipower. Meanwhile, it should also consider decommissioning the three other plants ahead of schedule. Taiwan cannot afford to take any chances when it comes to nuclear safety. There is no room for error.
Taiwan faces complex challenges like other Asia-Pacific nations, including demographic decline, income inequality and climate change. In fact, its challenges might be even more pressing. The nation struggles with rising income inequality, declining birthrates and soaring housing costs while simultaneously navigating intensifying global competition among major powers. To remain competitive in the global talent market, Taiwan has been working to create a more welcoming environment and legal framework for foreign professionals. One of the most significant steps in this direction was the enactment of the Act for the Recruitment and Employment of Foreign Professionals (外國專業人才延攬及僱用法) in 2018. Subsequent amendments in
The recent passing of Taiwanese actress Barbie Hsu (徐熙媛), known to many as “Big S,” due to influenza-induced pneumonia at just 48 years old is a devastating reminder that the flu is not just a seasonal nuisance — it is a serious and potentially fatal illness. Hsu, a beloved actress and cultural icon who shaped the memories of many growing up in Taiwan, should not have died from a preventable disease. Yet her death is part of a larger trend that Taiwan has ignored for too long — our collective underestimation of the flu and our low uptake of the
US President Donald Trump on Saturday signed orders to impose tariffs on Canada, Mexico and China effective from today. Trump decided to slap 25 percent tariffs on goods from Mexico and Canada as well as 10 percent on those coming from China, but would only impose a 10 percent tariff on Canadian energy products, including oil and electricity. Canada and Mexico on Sunday quickly responded with retaliatory tariffs against the US, while countermeasures from China are expected soon. Nevertheless, Trump announced yesterday to delay tariffs on Mexico and Canada for a month and said he would hold further talks with
Taiwan’s undersea cables connecting it to the world were allegedly severed several times by a Chinese ship registered under a flag of convenience. As the vessel sailed, it used several different automatic identification systems (AIS) to create fake routes. That type of “shadow fleet” and “gray zone” tactics could create a security crisis in Taiwan and warrants response measures. The concept of a shadow fleet originates from the research of Elisabeth Braw, senior fellow at the Washington-based Atlantic Council. The phenomenon was initiated by authoritarian countries such as Iran, North Korea and Russia, which have been hit by international economic