The next legislative and local government head elections are still eight months away, but each political party has started its nomination process. Although the People First Party and the New Party do not have their nomination plans ready yet, both the DPP and the KMT are using party primaries in their nomination systems. The DPP faces severe disputes over its primaries amid rumors of candidates' vote-buying. The KMT is busy negotiating with its candidates, due to the tense competition among them for the primaries.
Ever since the DPP passed its internal regulations for nomination of candidates for public offices (公職候選人提名辦法) in 1989, it has basically followed the principle of negotiation before primaries. Thus, the party's branch offices first try to come up with nominees in accordance with the principle of local autonomy. A local primary is held only when agreement cannot be reached.
The regulations have been modified 11 times since 1989 -- before almost every major election -- in order to adjust the party's primary system. In the past 12 years the DPP has repeatedly modified its primary system -- from one under which candidates were directly decided by party members, representatives, cadres, open primaries for all eligible voters or opinion polls -- in order to end manipulation by party factions, reduce the negative influence of so-called "nominal" party members (人頭黨員) or "pocket" party members (口袋黨員) and stop rampant vote-buying.
Judging from this year's primaries, however, the system has failed to stop corruption in the primaries and the vote-buying practices are worsening -- despite the fact that the proportion of party members' votes required for nomination has been lowered to 30 percent while the proportion of opinion polls has been raised to 70 percent.
The biggest problem in this year's primaries may lie in the design in which both the nominees for "legislators at large"
When facing the poor primaries, besides hoping that the DPP will aggressively attack vote-buying practices, some also suggest that opinion polls be added to the selection of legislator-at- large and overseas legislator nominees. Some even suggest amendments to the Public Officials Elections and Recall Law
Under Taiwan's unique election system and culture, although holding a primary is considered a democratic way for a party to decide its nominees, the design has its congenital defects. In fact, not too many Western political parties hold party primaries, not to mention the unique Taiwan twist of deciding nominees by opinion poll results. Apart from the Taiwanese people's blind faith in opinion polls, this situation also reflects the predicament facing parties under a poor election culture. The question is, can the difficulties really be solved by over-emphasizing the importance of opinion polls? A deeper concern is than if opinion polls continue to play a key role, forging a more responsible and more mature system of party politics in Taiwan will remain remote.
In fact, what needs to be changed most is perhaps Taiwan's current legislative election system of "multi-member district, single vote"
In a word, if Taiwan's legislative election system remains the same, parties' efforts to establish a fair primary system will be, as an Chinese old saying goes, "sorting out silk threads improperly only to tangle them further"
Wang Yeh-lih is chairman of the Department of Political Science at Tunghai University.
Translated by Eddy Chang
The recent passing of Taiwanese actress Barbie Hsu (徐熙媛), known to many as “Big S,” due to influenza-induced pneumonia at just 48 years old is a devastating reminder that the flu is not just a seasonal nuisance — it is a serious and potentially fatal illness. Hsu, a beloved actress and cultural icon who shaped the memories of many growing up in Taiwan, should not have died from a preventable disease. Yet her death is part of a larger trend that Taiwan has ignored for too long — our collective underestimation of the flu and our low uptake of the
For Taipei, last year was a particularly dangerous period, with China stepping up coercive pressures on Taiwan amid signs of US President Joe Biden’s cognitive decline, which eventually led his Democratic Party to force him to abandon his re-election campaign. The political drift in the US bred uncertainty in Taiwan and elsewhere in the Indo-Pacific region about American strategic commitment and resolve. With America deeply involved in the wars in Ukraine and the Middle East, the last thing Washington wanted was a Taiwan Strait contingency, which is why Biden invested in personal diplomacy with China’s dictator Xi Jinping (習近平). The return of
The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) has long been a cornerstone of US foreign policy, advancing not only humanitarian aid but also the US’ strategic interests worldwide. The abrupt dismantling of USAID under US President Donald Trump ‘s administration represents a profound miscalculation with dire consequences for global influence, particularly in the Indo-Pacific. By withdrawing USAID’s presence, Washington is creating a vacuum that China is eager to fill, a shift that will directly weaken Taiwan’s international position while emboldening Beijing’s efforts to isolate Taipei. USAID has been a crucial player in countering China’s global expansion, particularly in regions where
Actress Barbie Hsu (徐熙媛), known affectionately as “Big S,” recently passed away from pneumonia caused by the flu. The Mandarin word for the flu — which translates to “epidemic cold” in English — is misleading. Although the flu tends to spread rapidly and shares similar symptoms with the common cold, its name easily leads people to underestimate its dangers and delay seeking medical treatment. The flu is an acute viral respiratory illness, and there are vaccines to prevent its spread and strengthen immunity. This being the case, the Mandarin word for “influenza” used in Taiwan should be renamed from the misleading