President-elect Bush has now completed his Cabinet selections. The new ensemble is clearly one of the strongest and most experienced in recent memory. He has publicly acknowledged that it includes strong personalities who doubtless will differ with each other on specific issues. \nBush has also said he is ready to make the decisions should there be Cabinet disagreements. Clearly he is not going to begin his presidency on the defensive because of the close and contentious results of the election. He has started out somewhat like Ronald Reagan, who would determine the direction he wanted to go, and delegate the details to his Cabinet. We will see much more of this Cabinet than we did of the Clinton one. \nThis style will likely continue on to the next step -- selecting the deputy secretaries. The theory is that deputies manage the bureaucracy under them while the secretary steers broad policy and represents his department with the president and with the public. With this Cabinet, however, most will have a strong say in this deputy selection process and will choose the person most likely to be compatible with what he or she wants a deputy to do. On that basis, the media already has begun speculating who these might be. Of particular interest to the US-Taiwan relationship are the deputies for national security positions, the deputy secretaries of State and Defense, the ambassador to the UN, and the director of the CIA. \nColin Powell, with his background, will have strong ideas on how he wants to organize the top layer of the State Department and a strong say in who occupies senior positions. Powell has already mentioned the need to tighten management there. Someone near the top with know-how in the culture of diplomacy might be needed, but there has been a suggestion that there be two deputies at State, one for management and another for diplomacy. \nDonald Rumsfeld has already been a Secretary of Defense, and he has continued involvement in national security affairs on many committees established by Congress to study specific issues. Recently this has included both missile defense and satellite warfare. He will know what he wants to do, and what he wants a deputy to do, and he'll get his way. \nThe US ambassador to the UN is a high-profile position that the new president could elevate, or not, to Cabinet level depending, at least initially, on Powell's views. During the Cold War, the UN existed in a world of its own, but with the changes that have come about since then, including the many peacekeeping responsibilities, considerable substantive importance is attached to this prominent position. \nThe director of the Central Intelligence Agency, who heads not only the CIA, but the entire government intelligence community, does not have policy responsibilities, nor is he usually of Cabinet rank. This depends on the president, however. Reagan, for instance, elevated Bill Casey to Cabinet level with considerable influence on policy. \nThough this is based entirely on media speculation, the four names most often mentioned as candidates to fill these four positions are Rich Armitage, Paul Wolfowitz, John Bolton, and Mike Armacost. That is a list with which Taiwan could be quite comfortable, whatever assignment they receive. \nRich Armitage's background is well known. He has continued to maintain contact with his many friends in Taiwan, not only through his consulting firm, but on a personal basis as well. He was an advisor to Bush during the primaries and through the campaign. \nThe strong language Bush has used to describe his policy toward Asia [especially considering Japan as the US' top partner in Asia, and on defending Taiwan], is the work of Armitage. He was one of the signatories of a high-profile letter to Clinton in 1999, supporting the US commitment to defend Taiwan. His close friendship with Powell, his background in Vietnam, his experience as assistant secretary in the Department of Defense, and his continuing work on numerous panels and committees making recommendations on national-security issues, ensure he will be a player in the new Administration. \nPaul Wolfowitz, former undersecretary for policy at the Department of Defense, assistant secretary of State, and ambassador to Indonesia, is an academic and highly regarded policy expert. He was behind former Secretary of State George Schultz's attitude toward China, that China is an important but vastly overrated power. He too was a signatory of the 1999 memo supporting a clear commitment to the defense of Taiwan, and also has been an advisor to Bush on national security policy since he began running in the primaries. He is currently the head of the School of Advanced International Studies at Johns Hopkins University. He seems assured to have an influential position in the Bush government. \nJohn Bolton, executive vice president of the American Enterprise Institute think tank, is a former assistant attorney general, and later assistant secretary for international organizations in the State Department. He has testified before Congress in support of Taiwan's membership in international organizations, a cause in support of which he has had several articles published. His stalwart help to Bush in the Florida debacle, and his broad experience in both law and international affairs, also make him a likely candidate for an influential position in the Bush government. \nMike Armacost, now the head of the Brookings Institute, has welcomed scholarly exchanges with Taiwan in that capacity. He has been a special advisor to the US ambassador to Japan, a deputy assistant secretary in both State and Defense, and the undersecretary of state for political affairs during the Reagan administration. \nFor the media, pursuing leads on possible appointees will get increasingly difficult. Not only are the numbers of assistant secretaries, and for many departments even deputy assistant secretaries, much greater, but the number of people involved in making each decision increases. \nThough there is a tradition that a new president is given the benefit of the doubt on his initial appointments, interest groups are not a part of that tradition. Already some are preparing to pressure Senate members to vote against the attorney-general-designate, but most observers believe he will be confirmed. \nThe designated Cabinet members and deputy secretaries generally are quickly scheduled for hearings. While there will be many partisan battles on both issues and ideology, national security concerns with a new government taking power make Congress reluctant to leave these positions open. Candidates such as the four mentioned above, however, are a good sign for the US-Taiwan relationship. \nNat Bellocchi is the former chairman of the American Institute in Taiwan and is now a special adviser to the Liberty Times Group. This article represents his personal views.
With its passing of Hong Kong’s new National Security Law, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) continues to tighten its noose on Hong Kong. Gone is the broken 1997 promise that Hong Kong would have free, democratic elections by 2017. Gone also is any semblance that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) plays the long game. All the CCP had to do was hold the fort until 2047, when the “one country, two systems” framework would end and Hong Kong would rejoin the “motherland.” It would be a “demonstration-free” event. Instead, with the seemingly benevolent velvet glove off, the CCP has revealed its true iron
US President Donald Trump on Thursday issued executive orders barring Americans from conducting business with WeChat owner Tencent Holdings and ByteDance, the Beijing-based owner of popular video-sharing app TikTok. The orders are to take effect 45 days after they were signed, which is Sept. 20. The orders accuse WeChat of helping the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) review and remove content that it considers to be politically sensitive, and of using fabricated news to benefit itself. The White House has accused TikTok of collecting users’ information, location data and browsing histories, which could be used by the Chinese government, and pose
Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) at a ceremony on July 30 officially commissioned China’s BeiDou-3 satellite navigation system. The constellation of satellites, which is now fully operational, was completed six months ahead of schedule. Its deployment means that the People’s Republic of China (PRC) is now in possession of an autonomous, global satellite navigation system to rival the US’ GPS, Russia’s Glonass and the EU’s Galileo. Although Chinese officials have repeatedly sought to reassure the world that BeiDou-3 is primarily a civilian and commercial platform, US and European military experts beg to differ. Teresa Hitchens, a senior research associate at the University of
Taiwan’s rampant thesis and dissertation plagiarism has reduced the value of degrees, bringing the academic system’s public credibility to the brink of collapse. Data published on Retraction Watch — a blog that reports on retractions of scientific papers — showed that 73 papers written by Taiwanese researchers were retracted from international journals between 2012 and 2016 due to fake peer reviews, the second-highest in the world behind China. Based on the size of the academic population, Taiwan was the highest in the world, making it academically a pirate nation. Academic fraud in Taiwan can be divided into several types: the listing of coauthors;