When Shou Chi-yang (施啟揚) was president of the Judicial Yuan, he used to complain that the media was filing too many negative reports about the judicial system which was doing harm to his colleagues. Every time Shou took a taxi to work, he would tell the driver to take him to the nearby Presidential Office or to Taipei First Girls' High School, not daring to ask to be driven to the Judicial Yuan.
Even though the media and judicial system both play the role of truth-seeker, are both symbols of democratization, and have a history of shared suffering under martial law. Because of significant differences in their organizational systems and professional scope, a kind of tension has always existed between them. Shou's complaint is indeed a fact.
In terms of organization, the judicial system has always been a closed institution, interacting as little as possible with the media. No matter how momentous the ruling, if journalists don't actively follow it up, justices won't stick out their necks to inform the public about their decisions. The judiciary's consistent reluctance to expose individual cases or individuals in press announcements also makes it difficult for society to know what kinds of "landmark" rulings have taken place in the judicial arena, and which justices or prosecutors are particularly deserving of kudos.
Throughout US judicial history, however, landmark verdicts have been widely reported in the media.
The US Supreme Court's "Sullivan" verdict in the 60's, and a decision concerning Vietnam War documents in the 70's, were both "landmark" rulings that exemplify the relationship between judicial decisions and press freedom. The names of the judges who decided the rulings also went down in the annals of history.
Before Sullivan, speech that did injury to another's reputation received no Constitutional protection under the First Amendment. With the Sullivan ruling, however, courts at every level had a new precedent upon which to base rulings.
In Taiwan, seldom has there been any rulings that indicated signifigant progress in the area of speech and press freedom. Last year, however, the history of the past half-century was changed. The "509 Interpretation" (509
Still, there was probably some luck involved in the not-guilty verdict received by Yazhou Zhoukan. At the local level, the first trial was presided over by Lee Hsiung-hsin (李維心), while the appeal in the high court was heard by Lee Shih-kueh (李世貴). The Judicial Reform Foundation gave the two judges a rating of 80, and 70-80 respectively -- good assessments from the legal profession. Had other judges handled the cases instead, it's impossible to say if the rulings would have been so "lucky."
Taiwan is a society that lacks landmarks and precedents. Still, in the short span of a year, several rulings have come out of the judicial system that have effectively rewritten history. Making progress towards adopting a standard for press freedom similar to that enjoyed by Western democratic countries has been a "Great Leap Forward" for Taiwan. It is also been a triple-jump for press freedom. The names of those grand justices and judges will one day be inscribed on a "landmark -- history won't forget them.
Wang Chien-chuang is President of The Journalist magazine.
Translated by Scudder Smith
The recent passing of Taiwanese actress Barbie Hsu (徐熙媛), known to many as “Big S,” due to influenza-induced pneumonia at just 48 years old is a devastating reminder that the flu is not just a seasonal nuisance — it is a serious and potentially fatal illness. Hsu, a beloved actress and cultural icon who shaped the memories of many growing up in Taiwan, should not have died from a preventable disease. Yet her death is part of a larger trend that Taiwan has ignored for too long — our collective underestimation of the flu and our low uptake of the
For Taipei, last year was a particularly dangerous period, with China stepping up coercive pressures on Taiwan amid signs of US President Joe Biden’s cognitive decline, which eventually led his Democratic Party to force him to abandon his re-election campaign. The political drift in the US bred uncertainty in Taiwan and elsewhere in the Indo-Pacific region about American strategic commitment and resolve. With America deeply involved in the wars in Ukraine and the Middle East, the last thing Washington wanted was a Taiwan Strait contingency, which is why Biden invested in personal diplomacy with China’s dictator Xi Jinping (習近平). The return of
The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) has long been a cornerstone of US foreign policy, advancing not only humanitarian aid but also the US’ strategic interests worldwide. The abrupt dismantling of USAID under US President Donald Trump ‘s administration represents a profound miscalculation with dire consequences for global influence, particularly in the Indo-Pacific. By withdrawing USAID’s presence, Washington is creating a vacuum that China is eager to fill, a shift that will directly weaken Taiwan’s international position while emboldening Beijing’s efforts to isolate Taipei. USAID has been a crucial player in countering China’s global expansion, particularly in regions where
Actress Barbie Hsu (徐熙媛), known affectionately as “Big S,” recently passed away from pneumonia caused by the flu. The Mandarin word for the flu — which translates to “epidemic cold” in English — is misleading. Although the flu tends to spread rapidly and shares similar symptoms with the common cold, its name easily leads people to underestimate its dangers and delay seeking medical treatment. The flu is an acute viral respiratory illness, and there are vaccines to prevent its spread and strengthen immunity. This being the case, the Mandarin word for “influenza” used in Taiwan should be renamed from the misleading