"Let us resolve to be masters, not the victims, of our history, controlling our own destiny without giving way to blind suspicions and emotions."
That line from American President John F. Kennedy seems very apt when considering what New Year's Resolutions Taiwan ought to make in the criminal justice and human rights arena. To achieve true change in the legal system, to place human rights and civil liberties on a firm foundation, our nation will have to be, as JFK said, masters of its own history without giving way to blind suspicions or emotions. That is a tall order for Taiwan.
I would hope that over the next year our nation could carry through a set of resolutions that will mean something for human rights and civil liberties on our island. The first New Year's resolution I would hope for is an end to the death penalty. The death penalty is a medieval barbaric practice that serves no legitimate or rational end. It routinely sends both the guilty and the innocent to their deaths. It is time to end it.
The second New Year's resolution I would hope for is that the National Human Rights Commission gets the right people on its Board. By right people I mean tough, aggressive, informed advocates for human rights with the experience and the guts to do the job. I do not mean retired scholars, apologists or people whose only qualification is that the Legislative Yuan happens to owe them a favor. More than anything else, the board members of the National Human Rights Commission will make or break it.
The third New Year's resolution I would hope for is a set of constitutional amendments acting as a true bill of rights for Taiwan. This set of constitutional amendments could take as their model the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. I do not advocate simply passing a set of statutes, which is what is being envisioned.
The fourth New Year's resolution I would hope for is an aggressive but fair approach to ridding this island of black gold politics and corruption. What this involves is tough prosecution and tough sentencing within the bounds of the law, without sacrificing civil liberties. Human rights and civil liberties are not some kind of ransom that a nation must pay in order to rid itself of corruption. You don't trade one for the other. Corruption can and should be fought while giving full support to civil liberties.
The fifth New Year's resolution I would hope for is for the legal community, including the Ministry of Justice, the Judicial Yuan and the Bar Associations to make a fundamental decision regarding what form of trial structure Taiwan is going to have. There was much talk several years ago regarding legal reform and modernization. As is the norm here, the talk went basically nowhere.
The direction that Taiwan's "reform" is headed now is toward unworkable hybrid created by a lack of direction and competing political interests. If we elect to keep the German system we currently have then we ought to modernize it and bring it in line with the current German system.
If we intend to adopt an Anglo-American type system then there needs to be clear agreement on that and a definite, practical plan towards that end. Two metaphors come to mind when considering the current state of legal reform in Taiwan: "dead in the water" and "lost in the woods." Both are accurate.
The ultimate resolution that I would hope for is that those people, parties and agencies in a position to make changes resolve to be long on action and short on rhetoric.
Brian Kennedy is an attorney who writes and teaches on criminal justice and human rights issues.
Taiwan faces complex challenges like other Asia-Pacific nations, including demographic decline, income inequality and climate change. In fact, its challenges might be even more pressing. The nation struggles with rising income inequality, declining birthrates and soaring housing costs while simultaneously navigating intensifying global competition among major powers. To remain competitive in the global talent market, Taiwan has been working to create a more welcoming environment and legal framework for foreign professionals. One of the most significant steps in this direction was the enactment of the Act for the Recruitment and Employment of Foreign Professionals (外國專業人才延攬及僱用法) in 2018. Subsequent amendments in
After nine days of holidays for the Lunar New Year, government agencies and companies are to reopen for operations today, including the Legislative Yuan. Many civic groups are expected to submit their recall petitions this week, aimed at removing many Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers from their seats. Since December last year, the KMT and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) passed three controversial bills to paralyze the Constitutional Court, alter budgetary allocations and make recalling elected officials more difficult by raising the threshold. The amendments aroused public concern and discontent, sparking calls to recall KMT legislators. After KMT and TPP legislators again
US President Donald Trump on Saturday signed orders to impose tariffs on Canada, Mexico and China effective from today. Trump decided to slap 25 percent tariffs on goods from Mexico and Canada as well as 10 percent on those coming from China, but would only impose a 10 percent tariff on Canadian energy products, including oil and electricity. Canada and Mexico on Sunday quickly responded with retaliatory tariffs against the US, while countermeasures from China are expected soon. Nevertheless, Trump announced yesterday to delay tariffs on Mexico and Canada for a month and said he would hold further talks with
Taiwan’s undersea cables connecting it to the world were allegedly severed several times by a Chinese ship registered under a flag of convenience. As the vessel sailed, it used several different automatic identification systems (AIS) to create fake routes. That type of “shadow fleet” and “gray zone” tactics could create a security crisis in Taiwan and warrants response measures. The concept of a shadow fleet originates from the research of Elisabeth Braw, senior fellow at the Washington-based Atlantic Council. The phenomenon was initiated by authoritarian countries such as Iran, North Korea and Russia, which have been hit by international economic