Brilliantly said! ("Taiwan in quagmire," Dec. 30, 2000) On the other hand, what about proposing constructive directions to follow? The legacy of the KMT has been a huge cancer that infects all levels of society. Taiwan is not exactly an unselfish society. "Face" is far more important than actual accomplishment. When in doubt, the people run to America rather than stand and fight for Taiwanese ideals. Are there any Taiwanese ideals?
Sadly, it is apparent that Chen lacks leadership abilities. He is better at opposing rather than creating a sense of direction for the country. His speeches are (sadly) uninspired, even boring, to listen to. He doesn't get it. Vice President Lu cannot seem to get over her past anger and create hope. She only knows how to lash out.
The KMT just wants its power and money back. Of course, a real leader may emerge from all of this. Who knows? Chen could have won the day had he only declared independence from China, instead of acting like a provincial magistrate in China's huge bureaucracy. Chen really blew it! Very sad. Very sad.
Taiwan needs a leader who can get the will of the people behind him or her. Chen has no clue how to do this and even seems unwilling to try. He just gives speeches.
Robin Rose
Taipei
Politics obstructing progress
Being a faithful reader of your newspaper, I have been struck by the pessimism that has permeated Taiwan during the past two months.
Any objective observer from Europe or the US will tell you that Taiwan has a lot going for it, and that the Taiwanese people can be proud of themselves. But some elements in Taiwan's politics that were defeated in last March's elections are doing everything in their power to obstruct any progress being made during a DPP administration. This is self-defeating, as they will find out in the next legislative elections.
There is also a pervasive tendency in the news media and among opposition politicians to play up the "crisis" and the "quagmire." Without a doubt, if enough people keep talking like this, they will talk themselves into a crisis. I would hope that -- on the contrary -- there are still people in Taiwan who are confident that after our long road to democracy we are now ready to join the international community as a full and equal member.
Mei-chin Chen
Editor, Taiwan Communique
Washington DC
The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) has long been a cornerstone of US foreign policy, advancing not only humanitarian aid but also the US’ strategic interests worldwide. The abrupt dismantling of USAID under US President Donald Trump ‘s administration represents a profound miscalculation with dire consequences for global influence, particularly in the Indo-Pacific. By withdrawing USAID’s presence, Washington is creating a vacuum that China is eager to fill, a shift that will directly weaken Taiwan’s international position while emboldening Beijing’s efforts to isolate Taipei. USAID has been a crucial player in countering China’s global expansion, particularly in regions where
US President Donald Trump has gotten off to a head-spinning start in his foreign policy. He has pressured Denmark to cede Greenland to the United States, threatened to take over the Panama Canal, urged Canada to become the 51st US state, unilaterally renamed the Gulf of Mexico to “the Gulf of America” and announced plans for the United States to annex and administer Gaza. He has imposed and then suspended 25 percent tariffs on Canada and Mexico for their roles in the flow of fentanyl into the United States, while at the same time increasing tariffs on China by 10
With the manipulations of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), it is no surprise that this year’s budget plan would make government operations difficult. The KMT and the TPP passing malicious legislation in the past year has caused public ire to accumulate, with the pressure about to erupt like a volcano. Civic groups have successively backed recall petition drives and public consensus has reached a fever-pitch, with no let up during the long Lunar New Year holiday. The ire has even breached the mindsets of former staunch KMT and TPP supporters. Most Taiwanese have vowed to use
Despite the steady modernization of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA), the international community is skeptical of its warfare capabilities. Late last month, US think tank RAND Corp published two reports revealing the PLA’s two greatest hurdles: personnel challenges and structural difficulties. The first RAND report, by Jennie W. Wenger, titled Factors Shaping the Future of China’s Military, analyzes the PLA’s obstacles with recruitment, stating that China has long been committed to attracting young talent from top universities to augment the PLA’s modernization needs. However, the plan has two major constraints: demographic changes and the adaptability of the PLA’s military culture.