The implementation of the "small three links" (
However, will this in fact happen? The economic and crime issues aside, let us approach the issue solely from the standpoint of military strategy. If the small three links do not come with adequate and comprehensive supplemental measures to ensure strategic security for our country, the day that the small three links begin may also be the beginning of a crisis in the Kinmen region.
From the standpoint of air defense, after the direct aviation links begin, the off-shore islands will be left with a dangerously short warning period for attacks. It will become very difficult to prevent infiltration and surprise attacks. We have seen many prior international incidents in which military operations were carried through under the disguise of civil aviation. Two examples being the "Uganda Operation" and the tragedy of flight KE-007. It is impossible to know whether incidents such as these will occur in Taiwan after the small three links go into effect.
From the standpoint of naval defense, after direct sea links begin, if PRC boats legally enter Taiwan waters without close supervision, they will become immediate security threats to the off-shore islands because Taiwan authorities will be unable to distinguish them from local vessels. From the standpoint of ground defense, China may rely on disguises to conceal its military infiltration and surprise attacks, preventing Kinmen from engaging in independent defense and offensives.
After the small three links begin, the strategic value of the distant islands of Kinmen will decrease. Plus, once Kinmen's military and strategic value to Taiwan is reduced, the issue of whether the number of the troops stationed there should be adjusted will be raised. The troops may even be withdrawn altogether as a result of pressure by pro-unification lawmakers.
Once Kinmen loses its ability to act as a front-line of defense, the invisible middle line between Kinmen and Matsu will be challenged. With the two sides of the Taiwan Strait only a hundred or so nautical miles away, not only will enemy planes be able to reach Taiwan in a very short period of time, but PRC fighter jets may launch surprise attacks against Taiwan under cover and by trailing commercial airplanes.
The prospects do not look promising considering the PRC authorities continue to give Taiwan the cold shoulder. In addition, China has not decreased or eased its military threats in response to the goodwill shown by Taiwan in the launching of the small three links. We do not see any possible way the PRC will declare a willingness to refrain from use of force against Taiwan.
However, it is quite possible that China will gradually infiltrate and engulf Kinmen and Matsu and destroy their ability to strategically serve as buffers for Taiwan and Penghu. This may open the way for the People's Liberation Army to take over Kinmen and Matsu by a Trojan Horse tactic. From the standpoints of both military strategy and crime control, I cannot help but feel concerned about the risk of opening our door to China.
Chai Trong is a DPP lawmaker.
In a stark reminder of China’s persistent territorial overreach, Pema Wangjom Thongdok, a woman from Arunachal Pradesh holding an Indian passport, was detained for 18 hours at Shanghai Pudong Airport on Nov. 24 last year. Chinese immigration officials allegedly informed her that her passport was “invalid” because she was “Chinese,” refusing to recognize her Indian citizenship and claiming Arunachal Pradesh as part of South Tibet. Officials had insisted that Thongdok, an Indian-origin UK resident traveling for a conference, was not Indian despite her valid documents. India lodged a strong diplomatic protest, summoning the Chinese charge d’affaires in Delhi and demanding
Immediately after the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) “Justice Mission” exercise at the end of last year, a question was posed to Indian Ministry of External Affairs spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal regarding recent developments involving the exercises around Taiwan, and how he viewed their impact on regional peace and stability. His answer was somewhat perplexing to me as a curious student of Taiwanese affairs. “India closely follows developments across the Indo-Pacific region,” he said, adding: “We have an abiding interest in peace and stability in the region, in view of our significant trade, economic, people-to-people, and maritime interests. We urge all concerned
In the past 72 hours, US Senators Roger Wicker, Dan Sullivan and Ruben Gallego took to social media to publicly rebuke the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) over the defense budget. I understand that Taiwan’s head is on the chopping block, and the urgency of its security situation cannot be overstated. However, the comments from Wicker, Sullivan and Gallego suggest they have fallen victim to a sophisticated disinformation campaign orchestrated by an administration in Taipei that treats national security as a partisan weapon. The narrative fed to our allies claims the opposition is slashing the defense budget to kowtow to the Chinese
In a Taipei Times editorial published almost three years ago (“Macron goes off-piste,” April 13, 2023, page 8), French President Emmanuel Macron was criticized for comments he made immediately after meeting Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing. Macron had spoken of the need for his country to find a path on Chinese foreign policy no longer aligned with that of the US, saying that continuing to follow the US agenda would sacrifice the EU’s strategic autonomy. At the time, Macron was criticized for gifting Xi a PR coup, and the editorial said that he had been “persuaded to run
RSS