Michael J Fonte wrote an eloquent piece on the shifting position of the US Department of Defense (DOD) in defending Taiwan as a matter of American national interest (Dec. 26, page 8). The DOD has under US law, however, obligations to Taiwan that are far more legally binding than civilian policymakers at the US State Department have ever conceded. Mr. Fonte regrettably overlooks this most important military mandate, hence his article's exclusion of the foremost policy position of the TRA, which is made at Section 2 (c), and reads: "Nothing contained in this Act shall contravene the interest of the United States in human rights, especially with respect to the human rights of all the approximately 18 million inhabitants of Taiwan. The preservation and enhancement of the human rights of all the people on Taiwan are hereby reaffirmed as objectives of the United States."
This military mandate has been insidiously buried within American military laws and regulations, and it is not surprising that the Clinton administration of draft-dodging intellectuals would ever stop to think that the TRA's policy mandates for the elaboration of the American national interest are legal issues of a specific military nature. This clause in the TRA, defining the national interest of America, must be construed as giving the highest consideration to the protection of human rights in Taiwan. Otherwise, the powers that be risk violating their oaths of office. When conflicting State Department definitions of national security like the "one China" policy are wrongfully advanced by government officials, their compromising behavior is a contravention of the TRA.
The new policy shift of the DOD is a most welcome and insightful development. Unfortunately, civilian lawyers and pundits are still missing what is clearly the highest military priority under the laws pertaining to Taiwan. It is to be hoped that the incoming civilian policy makers of the Bush administration will publicly acknowledge the extent of the legal obligations due to Taiwan before they unambiguously imperil their more personal policy preferences for China. Please don't forget, the preservation and enhancement of human rights on Taiwan are obligations of the US under US law.
Jeff Geer
Henderson, NV, USA
Taiwan faces complex challenges like other Asia-Pacific nations, including demographic decline, income inequality and climate change. In fact, its challenges might be even more pressing. The nation struggles with rising income inequality, declining birthrates and soaring housing costs while simultaneously navigating intensifying global competition among major powers. To remain competitive in the global talent market, Taiwan has been working to create a more welcoming environment and legal framework for foreign professionals. One of the most significant steps in this direction was the enactment of the Act for the Recruitment and Employment of Foreign Professionals (外國專業人才延攬及僱用法) in 2018. Subsequent amendments in
After nine days of holidays for the Lunar New Year, government agencies and companies are to reopen for operations today, including the Legislative Yuan. Many civic groups are expected to submit their recall petitions this week, aimed at removing many Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers from their seats. Since December last year, the KMT and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) passed three controversial bills to paralyze the Constitutional Court, alter budgetary allocations and make recalling elected officials more difficult by raising the threshold. The amendments aroused public concern and discontent, sparking calls to recall KMT legislators. After KMT and TPP legislators again
US President Donald Trump on Saturday signed orders to impose tariffs on Canada, Mexico and China effective from today. Trump decided to slap 25 percent tariffs on goods from Mexico and Canada as well as 10 percent on those coming from China, but would only impose a 10 percent tariff on Canadian energy products, including oil and electricity. Canada and Mexico on Sunday quickly responded with retaliatory tariffs against the US, while countermeasures from China are expected soon. Nevertheless, Trump announced yesterday to delay tariffs on Mexico and Canada for a month and said he would hold further talks with
Taiwan’s undersea cables connecting it to the world were allegedly severed several times by a Chinese ship registered under a flag of convenience. As the vessel sailed, it used several different automatic identification systems (AIS) to create fake routes. That type of “shadow fleet” and “gray zone” tactics could create a security crisis in Taiwan and warrants response measures. The concept of a shadow fleet originates from the research of Elisabeth Braw, senior fellow at the Washington-based Atlantic Council. The phenomenon was initiated by authoritarian countries such as Iran, North Korea and Russia, which have been hit by international economic