The leaders of the three-party opposition alliance proposed during their recent meeting that constitutional amendments should first "change the current presidential election system to an absolute majority system," and "resort to an election system that integrates political parties with mainstream popular opinion."
For the time being, let's set aside the question of whether Taiwan's future constitutional system should develop along the lines of the US presidential system or more clearly toward a semi-presidential system.
In the current political situation, many people are in favor of using a two-round, absolute majority voting system to elect the president in order to strengthen the president's popular mandate and to serve as a mechanism for concentrating public opinion.
But, in discussions of constitutional amendments, similar importance should also be attached to reforming the election system for the legislature, which acts as a check on executive authority. Otherwise, even if we elect a president that has a solid mandate, we could be destined to move toward a system of either strongman politics or political stalemate, given the present environment in the legislature. Thus, while discussing reforms to the system for electing the president, it is necessary that "complementary" reforms to the system for electing legislatures should also be considered. Otherwise, breaking free from the blind worship of executive power will be difficult.
A key part of the French Fifth Republic's 1958 constitutional reforms involved changing from a proportional representation system, used during legislative elections in the Fourth Republic, to a single-member district, two-round voting system. This was done in an effort to improve the growing problem in the Fourth Republic of presented by the existence of too many political parties. As far as presidential elections are concerned, a two-round absolute majority electoral system was eventually passed by public referendum in 1962.
In Taiwan, if the political parties agree to adopt a two-round, absolute majority system for only the presidential election and yet -- due to the consideration of vested interests -- maintain the current multi-member district and single non-transferrable vote system for legislative elections, then the chaos in the legislature is likely to persist, as is "black gold" politics. Party discipline will remain ineffective. With such a legislature, the operation of the Constitution will still deteriorate even if we have a president with a strong mandate.
More often than not, the choice of system has a major impact on the operation of the Constitution. Think about it. If we had adopted a US-style electoral college system during the second stage of our constitutional amendments, then what would have resulted from a situation like today's US presidential election, whereby one candidate -- despite having won more popular votes -- is defeated because he gets fewer National Assembly votes under a multi-member district system?
Similarly, if in future constitutional amendments we adopt an "integrative" two-round, absolute majority system for the presidential election on the one hand, and yet on the other hand adopt a "divisive" multi-member district, single non-transferrable vote system for legislative elections, what kind of party politics will emerge from the joint operation of these two electoral systems that are based on very different logic?
I hope that the politicians and political parties that control decision-making on Taiwan's constitutional reforms will think in terms of the big picture. Haven't we had enough bitter fruit from the past six rounds of constitutional amendments?
Wang Ye-lih is a professor in the politics department at Tunghai University.
On Monday, the day before Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) departed on her visit to China, the party released a promotional video titled “Only with peace can we ‘lie flat’” to highlight its desire to have peace across the Taiwan Strait. However, its use of the expression “lie flat” (tang ping, 躺平) drew sarcastic comments, with critics saying it sounded as if the party was “bowing down” to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Amid the controversy over the opposition parties blocking proposed defense budgets, Cheng departed for China after receiving an invitation from the CCP, with a meeting with
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) is leading a delegation to China through Sunday. She is expected to meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing tomorrow. That date coincides with the anniversary of the signing of the Taiwan Relations Act (TRA), which marked a cornerstone of Taiwan-US relations. Staging their meeting on this date makes it clear that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) intends to challenge the US and demonstrate its “authority” over Taiwan. Since the US severed official diplomatic relations with Taiwan in 1979, it has relied on the TRA as a legal basis for all
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
Taiwan ranks second globally in terms of share of population with a higher-education degree, with about 60 percent of Taiwanese holding a post-secondary or graduate degree, a survey by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development showed. The findings are consistent with Ministry of the Interior data, which showed that as of the end of last year, 10.602 million Taiwanese had completed post-secondary education or higher. Among them, the number of women with graduate degrees was 786,000, an increase of 48.1 percent over the past decade and a faster rate of growth than among men. A highly educated population brings clear advantages.