US President Bill Clinton arrived for a three-day visit to Vietnam late Thursday night. His trip is full of profound symbolic significance. He is the first sitting US president to visit Vietnam since the Vietnam War. Clinton's personal anti-war record further enhances the significance of his visit. The trip is also bringing much in the way of substantive economic benefits for both sides, as shown by a US$500 million agreement between Vietnam's state-run airline and Boeing Corp -- the biggest transaction of 10 set to be signed by US companies during the trip. Trade relations between the two countries are obviously heading for significant changes, creating more employment opportunities for both sides.
On April 30, 1975, North Vietnam captured Saigon, ending the so-called "American War" and completing the unification of South and North Vietnam. A 20-year-long (1975 to 1994) US economic embargo ensued, leading to the political and economic isolation of Vietnam, an outpouring of refugees, and difficulties in post-war reconstruction.
Clinton's presidency has overseen major shifts in US-Vietnamese relations. First, the economic embargo was lifted on Feb. 2, 1994 and then formal diplomatic relations were established on July 11, 1995. On July 13 of this year, the two sides signed a bilateral economic trade agreement, normalizing their economic relationship. A property dispute between the two has been resolved by the establishment of offices in other's country. The only issues left are the remains of prisoners of war and US soldiers missing in action, as well the cleaning-up of landmines.
Vietnam's continued skepticism toward the US, however, has much to do with the way it has been treated in the post-war era. From Jimmy Carter to Ronald Reagan to the George Bush administration, Washington continued to view Vietnam with a cold war mentality, seeing it solely as a satellite of the Soviet Union. Therefore, the US continued to isolate Vietnam economically and diplomatically. In addition, some veteran organizations and former South Vietnam officials and officers living in the US continued to live in the past, unable to acknowledge that reform and liberalization have changed Vietnam.
Although Vietnam continues to be a one-party totalitarian country and a rather closed society, it is much more politically stable in comparison with Indonesia and the Philippines. While Vietnam's average annual income per capita of US$350 lags behind most other developing countries, at least the living standard in the cities has largely improved due to economic liberalization.
Even more importantly, 60 percent of Vietnam's 79 million people belong to the post-war generation. They feel no antagonism toward the US. The biggest obstacles toward normalization of relations are political and cultural differences. Even hardliners believe that while the lessons of the war should never be forgotten, it does no good to touch upon old injuries now. They want stability, prosperity and international recognition as well.
To the Vietnamese government, Clinton's visit symbolizes Washington's acceptance of the country's unification and independence, as well as recognition of Vietnam's international status. It is the end-point to decades of anti-colonial struggle.
To Clinton, the trip may be the last diplomatic hurrah of his presidency. In view of the possible resentment by conservatives and Vietnam veterans, he is unable to apologize for the death of millions of Vietnamese during the war, but he can at least acknowledge the suffering of the Vietnamese. That should be sufficient to close the chapter on the war.
The US' participation in the war prevented the spread of communism to other Southeast Asian countries. Now it is time for other Asian countries to help Vietnam back onto its feet.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Former minister of culture Lung Ying-tai (龍應台) has long wielded influence through the power of words. Her articles once served as a moral compass for a society in transition. However, as her April 1 guest article in the New York Times, “The Clock Is Ticking for Taiwan,” makes all too clear, even celebrated prose can mislead when romanticism clouds political judgement. Lung crafts a narrative that is less an analysis of Taiwan’s geopolitical reality than an exercise in wistful nostalgia. As political scientists and international relations academics, we believe it is crucial to correct the misconceptions embedded in her article,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which