The uncertain outcome of the US presidential election has Americans demanding that a result be announced as quickly as possible. Demonstrators pose for the international cameras carrying signs saying: "America held hostage -- day 4."
Comedians joke that when they are asked who is the leader of the country, they just shrug. Much of the country seems to be engrossed in the process as the media spoon-feeds them breaking news sound-bites. People, we are told, do not want a rush to judgment, but at the same time they want an immediate resolution of the race so they can know who won.
Of course everyone wants to know who the next president of the US will be, but it is unfortunate to see that the public has lost its ability to be patient. Bush supporters say that no hand counts should take place, even though this redress is lawful in the state of Florida. The Bush camp says that leaving the country in suspense is not in the national interest.
How?
Would people really rather take the time to get it right, or should Americans ignore the rights of any party to use whatever legal means are available to challenge the validity of the initial count?
Florida law calls for a recount if the difference between candidates is less than half of one percent. Florida law also states that ballots must contain the names of the candidates on the left of the area where the voter's preference is to be marked. In Palm Beach County this was not done. Whether or not the use of so-called "butterfly ballots" is confusing is immaterial. What is important is the fact that Florida law states that butterfly ballots are not valid. There should be no debate on this issue. However, since another aspect of the US legal system is the right of appeal, this avenue could also be taken.
People inside and outside the US are saying that this process of recounting, hand counting and legal challenges is proving that the US system is somehow not working; that this unusual situation has shown that there is too much legal regulation and too much room to maneuver in and around an issue that should be cut and dried -- who won?
Unfortunately, much of the modern world has been lulled into a 500 TV-channel lethargy with an attention span no greater than that of an infant. People do not seem to want to spend the time to debate the issue or even gather the facts surrounding the matter to give it the kind of consideration it deserves. It's really quite bizarre when you think about it. The US citizenry demands to know who is the next president right now because the presidency is such an important position, yet, for the very same reason, people are not willing to go slowly and let the issue work its way through the system to a fair and logical conclusion. The office of the president of the US is a very important job. Doesn't it make sense to allow enough time to understand clearly what is the exact nature of the situation in Florida, or for that matter, any other state that comes under scrutiny?
Instead of questioning the legitimacy of the right to make legal challenges as some in the US and elsewhere are doing, these people should think about the mechanism that is now at work. There is nothing broken about the US system; the events subsequent to the presidential election are proof that there is a well-tuned mechanism in place. Yes, the process takes time, but that is a consequence of providing each and every player in the drama with a fair chance to be heard.
It is now clear that the "final" vote count in Florida made immediately after the polls closed was inaccurate. By using the checks and balances of the US legal system, ultimately a true count of the vote will be made public, and no one will be able to say that there is any question about who won or who lost.
Mark Wolfe is a journalist based in Taipei.
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), joined by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), held a protest on Saturday on Ketagalan Boulevard in Taipei. They were essentially standing for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which is anxious about the mass recall campaign against KMT legislators. President William Lai (賴清德) said that if the opposition parties truly wanted to fight dictatorship, they should do so in Tiananmen Square — and at the very least, refrain from groveling to Chinese officials during their visits to China, alluding to meetings between KMT members and Chinese authorities. Now that China has been defined as a foreign hostile force,
RSS