The debate over the safety of nuclear energy seems endless. Now everyone can certainly see the potency of nuclear energy. Although the chance of a nuclear meltdown is only one in a million, the political thermonuclear bomb which has exploded over the issue of nuclear energy by Taiwan proves the danger of such an energy source.
Both the timing and manner of the Chen Shui-bian
The announcement facilitated a "nuclear integration" among the KMT, PFP, and the New Party, setting in motion a confrontation leading to a "nuclear division."
The petition for a presidential recall launched by the KMT legislators has been endorsed by more than 140 signatories so far, approaching the 147 required for a recall proposal to pass.
The controversy over the plant may be resolved within the legal framework by a legal amendment to our nuclear energy policy. As the ruling party is, of course, a minority in the Legislative Yuan, however, it is unwilling to accept this approach. Even if the legislature goes ahead with a legal amendment, the Presidential Office and the Executive Yuan will be sure to oppose the legislation, dragging the controversy out until next year's legislative election.
Our Constitution provides other options for dealing with such a controversy, including a vote of no confidence, a presidential recall and/or an interpretation of the Constitution by the Grand Council of Justices.
The first two options will escalate the political chaos -- further weakening the already shaky economic and social conditions. Can Taiwan afford the social cost of six months to a year of political unrest? Even if it can, how far behind will it place Taiwan in cross-strait affairs and international competition thereafter?
Assuming that the Council of Grand Justices makes a ruling interpreting the legal force of the plant's approved budget, either side could easily flip a coin and decide to continue the warfare. The problem would remain.
As the president is deeply involved in the controversy, he lacks impartiality. He is therefore incapable of mediating an inter-branch dispute in accordance with Article 44 of the Constitution. A meeting between the heads of the four government branches has proven futile.
The announcement of the halt of the plant's construction immediately after a meeting between Chen and Lien Chan
The last hope for a political resolution is former president Lee Teng-hui
If Lee, as a former president, were willing to step in and mediate the controversy so that the political parties may find a way out of the current standoff, this would certainly illustrate his magnanimity. Were he to do so, the political storm would soon die out and our society would be able to avoid the devastation caused by chain reactions to the nuclear controversy.
Vincent Lin is the deputy editor in chief of the Taipei Times.
A foreign colleague of mine asked me recently, “What is a safe distance from potential People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Rocket Force’s (PLARF) Taiwan targets?” This article will answer this question and help people living in Taiwan have a deeper understanding of the threat. Why is it important to understand PLA/PLARF targeting strategy? According to RAND analysis, the PLA’s “systems destruction warfare” focuses on crippling an adversary’s operational system by targeting its networks, especially leadership, command and control (C2) nodes, sensors, and information hubs. Admiral Samuel Paparo, commander of US Indo-Pacific Command, noted in his 15 May 2025 Sedona Forum keynote speech that, as
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) concludes his fourth visit to China since leaving office, Taiwan finds itself once again trapped in a familiar cycle of political theater. The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has criticized Ma’s participation in the Straits Forum as “dancing with Beijing,” while the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) defends it as an act of constitutional diplomacy. Both sides miss a crucial point: The real question is not whether Ma’s visit helps or hurts Taiwan — it is why Taiwan lacks a sophisticated, multi-track approach to one of the most complex geopolitical relationships in the world. The disagreement reduces Taiwan’s
Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) is visiting China, where he is addressed in a few ways, but never as a former president. On Sunday, he attended the Straits Forum in Xiamen, not as a former president of Taiwan, but as a former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairman. There, he met with Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference Chairman Wang Huning (王滬寧). Presumably, Wang at least would have been aware that Ma had once been president, and yet he did not mention that fact, referring to him only as “Mr Ma Ying-jeou.” Perhaps the apparent oversight was not intended to convey a lack of
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) last week announced that the KMT was launching “Operation Patriot” in response to an unprecedented massive campaign to recall 31 KMT legislators. However, his action has also raised questions and doubts: Are these so-called “patriots” pledging allegiance to the country or to the party? While all KMT-proposed campaigns to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers have failed, and a growing number of local KMT chapter personnel have been indicted for allegedly forging petition signatures, media reports said that at least 26 recall motions against KMT legislators have passed the second signature threshold
RSS