The gladiatorial grudge match between the ruling and opposition parties was postponed yesterday as the Legislative Yuan delayed a vote on a proposal for a recall of the president and vice president. If this represents a lack of opposition zeal in pursuing what is a frivolous and vindictive measure, it is good news. If, however, it just marks a respite before attacking with renewed energy, there is still much to fear. In the next few days, both sides may go all out to win votes and even more fierce street confrontations could take place, intensifying the polarization of society. Or communication and negotiation could be speeded up, facilitating some sort of reconciliation.
The idea of a recall motion has escalated from a legislative issue into street protests. The office of Legislative Yuan Speaker Wang Jin-pyng
Both DPP Chairman Frank Hsieh
The secretaries-general of the three opposition parties held a joint meeting yesterday for the first time, in which they swore to act in the interest of the people of Taiwan. The parties would be wise to take note of the mood of the people. Although most people oppose the discontinuation of the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant, more than half of them also oppose the current move to recall the president. Chen Shui-bian's (陳水扁) administration has certainly made mistakes, but so far its errors do not warrant a recall.
Without the justification of popular support, recalling a president who has been in office less than six months for failing to get his government on track and for dissatisfaction over his handling of administrative policy seems unreasonable. In addition, between the proposal of recall and a popular vote on the issue, our society will undergo half a year of chaos. The enormous social costs are not a price that Taiwan's fragile economy can afford.
The New Wave Faction
The question is how will the opposition and ruling party find a way out of their current standoff? Since Chen lacks an impartial stance on the nuclear plant controversy, we suggest that former president Lee Teng-hui (
A high-school student surnamed Yang (楊) gained admissions to several prestigious medical schools recently. However, when Yang shared his “learning portfolio” on social media, he was caught exaggerating and even falsifying content, and his admissions were revoked. Now he has to take the “advanced subjects test” scheduled for next month. With his outstanding performance in the general scholastic ability test (GSAT), Yang successfully gained admissions to five prestigious medical schools. However, his university dreams have now been frustrated by the “flaws” in his learning portfolio. This is a wake-up call not only for students, but also teachers. Yang did make a big
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) concludes his fourth visit to China since leaving office, Taiwan finds itself once again trapped in a familiar cycle of political theater. The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has criticized Ma’s participation in the Straits Forum as “dancing with Beijing,” while the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) defends it as an act of constitutional diplomacy. Both sides miss a crucial point: The real question is not whether Ma’s visit helps or hurts Taiwan — it is why Taiwan lacks a sophisticated, multi-track approach to one of the most complex geopolitical relationships in the world. The disagreement reduces Taiwan’s
Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) is visiting China, where he is addressed in a few ways, but never as a former president. On Sunday, he attended the Straits Forum in Xiamen, not as a former president of Taiwan, but as a former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairman. There, he met with Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference Chairman Wang Huning (王滬寧). Presumably, Wang at least would have been aware that Ma had once been president, and yet he did not mention that fact, referring to him only as “Mr Ma Ying-jeou.” Perhaps the apparent oversight was not intended to convey a lack of
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) last week announced that the KMT was launching “Operation Patriot” in response to an unprecedented massive campaign to recall 31 KMT legislators. However, his action has also raised questions and doubts: Are these so-called “patriots” pledging allegiance to the country or to the party? While all KMT-proposed campaigns to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers have failed, and a growing number of local KMT chapter personnel have been indicted for allegedly forging petition signatures, media reports said that at least 26 recall motions against KMT legislators have passed the second signature threshold