On Oct. 24, the Control Yuan impeached three former high-ranking navy officers over irregularities in the purchase of French Lafayette-class frigates. According to the Control Yuan, the standard procedures for military purchases must be followed and no matter how well-intended the motivation; any irregularity which violates these procedures is wrong.
But this lesson doesn't appear to have hit home with the Executive Yuan, for it seems inevitable that Premier Chang Chun-hsiung
The Executive Yuan listed three major considerations in its decision to stop construction of the plant: One, nuclear safety and nuclear waste processing; two, the feasibility of alternative plans; three, the legal issues involving a halt of the construction.
The first and the second considerations involve political and professional judgements of a public policy on which a consensus has proved difficult to reach since people have differing views. The third consideration, however, is clearly a yes-no issue which the government cannot avoid.
As a consequence, the government will face compensation proceedings and impeachment by the Control Yuan.
Not that the threat of impeachment seems to worry Executive Yuan officials. Toeing the party political line is their only serious concern. The consequence, however, of not implementing the Legislative Yuan's decision is very serious. It is a major slap in the face to the Legislative Yuan, which is currently reviewing the Executive Yuan's proposal for next year's national budget. Legislators may now legitimately ask why they should bother to review the budget at all, if the Executive Yuan sees no reason to abide by measures passed?
The Executive Yuan has listed 22 examples of legislative budget decisions that were not implemented in the past without the government facing censure either from the legislature or the Control Yuan. But the situation in this case is totally different. In the examples cited by the Executive Yuan, implementation was halted because various difficulties had made the policies impossible to be carried out. Lack of implementation was because of force majeure. The Fourth Nuclear Power Plant budget certainly can be implemented. It is stopped only by executive fiat.
The political repercussions of the Executive Yuan's decision will be serious. First, it sets a bad example through flouting the law. Second, the decision will not halt the dispute over the plant, only send it into temporary hibernation. If the DPP fails to win a legislative majority in next year's election, or if the people of Taiwan choose to "rotate" political parties in the next presidential election in three year's time, the nuclear plant issue could return with a vengeance. The government, by its irresponsible attitude toward this issue, has turned the cancellation of the project into a never-ending controversy.
If the government insists on cancelling the plant, the Executive Yuan must use legal means to achieve it if it wishes to solve the problem once and for all. A referendum would provide the government with the perfect means to resolve its difficulties in one fell swoop, also being the surest way to elicit the public consensus that KMT Chairman Lien Chan (連戰) asked President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) to seek yesterday.
The government rejected sound advice form Lien by announcing its decision immediately after yesterday's meeting. The swift decision has also seriously damaged the efforts to build trust between political parties and dramatically increased political uncertainties.
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
Every analyst watching Iran’s succession crisis is asking who would replace supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Yet, the real question is whether China has learned enough from the Persian Gulf to survive a war over Taiwan. Beijing purchases roughly 90 percent of Iran’s exported crude — some 1.61 million barrels per day last year — and holds a US$400 billion, 25-year cooperation agreement binding it to Tehran’s stability. However, this is not simply the story of a patron protecting an investment. China has spent years engineering a sanctions-evasion architecture that was never really about Iran — it was about Taiwan. The
For Taiwan, the ongoing US and Israeli strikes on Iranian targets are a warning signal: When a major power stretches the boundaries of self-defense, smaller states feel the tremors first. Taiwan’s security rests on two pillars: US deterrence and the credibility of international law. The first deters coercion from China. The second legitimizes Taiwan’s place in the international community. One is material. The other is moral. Both are indispensable. Under the UN Charter, force is lawful only in response to an armed attack or with UN Security Council authorization. Even pre-emptive self-defense — long debated — requires a demonstrably imminent
Since being re-elected, US President Donald Trump has consistently taken concrete action to counter China and to safeguard the interests of the US and other democratic nations. The attacks on Iran, the earlier capture of deposed of Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro and efforts to remove Chinese influence from the Panama Canal all demonstrate that, as tensions with Beijing intensify, Washington has adopted a hardline stance aimed at weakening its power. Iran and Venezuela are important allies and major oil suppliers of China, and the US has effectively decapitated both. The US has continuously strengthened its military presence in the Philippines. Japanese Prime