Less than a week after the new Cabinet was formed, a high-profile economic forum between Cabinet officials and business leaders was convened to help deal with the nose-diving stock market. Five guarantees and six beneficial economic policy measures were announced, but the following day the stock market failed to show clear signs of improvement due to rumors of military threats from China.
The rumors about such military threats were nothing more than the release of a national defense white paper and routine training exercises. Neither the content of the white paper nor the exercise itself was anything new, yet they managed to thoroughly subvert the policies of the economic forum.
The brittleness of Taiwanese investors' confidence can't help but make one feel surprised. However, rather than accusing Beijing of harboring ill intentions, the new government would be better off reflecting on its own policy shortcomings.
Among the most concrete policies, first consider the elimination of the business tax for financial institutions, six-month extensions for traditional industries on repayment of loan principle and backing loans to medium and small enterprises provided by a credit guarantee fund.
The problem is that the relative weight of the financial industry and traditional industries on the stock market is at present less than 30 percent. Even if it is possible to deliver an injection to stimulate these industries, the effect on the overall stock market will be rather limited.
Clearly, a still more central issue is how to deal with the emergence of a bubble economy and relocation of industry overseas, thereby speeding up the transformation of Taiwan's economy. There are two key points.
First, ensuring a stable investment environment and second, stimulating the rapid rise of new mainstream industries. The government has so far failed to provide any guarantees to reassure people on these two key points.
The stability of the investment environment requires that the government eliminate confusing policy statements and take a clear stand on important issues. But the new government is hesitant and vague to this day about whether or not construction will continue on the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant
Regarding the deadlock between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait, the new government is stuck in the mud over whether or not there was a consensus in 1992 between Taiwan and China. Even if there are plans for the "small three links" with China
The new government has treated the problem of the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant as a simple energy issue. However, the sudden halting of plant construction and subsequent descent into indecisive political squabbling has already caused the quality of the government's policymaking to come under deep suspicion. Former premier Tang Fei's
As for the deadlock across the Taiwan Strait, the government's miring itself in the mud has also caused us to have no basis upon which to map out an economic development strategy. China's economy has become the center of attention, following the US approving PNTR status for China and with both Taiwan and China on the verge of entering the WTO. In contrast to the sudden fall in most of the world's stock markets, the Shanghai bourse has gone against the trend and risen. In contrast to the dismal forecast for most of the world's economies next year, the Chinese economy has excellent prospects. Naturally Taiwanese businessmen, who enjoy a favorable position, won't shut themselves out of the highly regarded Chinese market. A new wave of enthusiasm for doing business in China is on the rise, challenging the restraining "no haste, be patient"
Still more serious is that this new wave of enthusiasm for China comes just as Taiwan's electronics industry is in the midst of a large-scale movement overseas. However, what course Taiwan's new mainstream industries will follow is not as obvious as it was in the 1980's. In the face of another wave of industries moving abroad, the government still has no comprehensive plan for the transformation of the economy.
Endless debate that doesn't result in any decisions being made is the real source of trouble in the stock market. When faced with serious illness, the new government can't just provide relief for the symptoms. The heart of the problem must be treated before people can be won over.
Julian Kuo is an associate professor of political science at Soochow University. translated by Ethan Harkness
The Chinese government on March 29 sent shock waves through the Tibetan Buddhist community by announcing the untimely death of one of its most revered spiritual figures, Hungkar Dorje Rinpoche. His sudden passing in Vietnam raised widespread suspicion and concern among his followers, who demanded an investigation. International human rights organization Human Rights Watch joined their call and urged a thorough investigation into his death, highlighting the potential involvement of the Chinese government. At just 56 years old, Rinpoche was influential not only as a spiritual leader, but also for his steadfast efforts to preserve and promote Tibetan identity and cultural
Former minister of culture Lung Ying-tai (龍應台) has long wielded influence through the power of words. Her articles once served as a moral compass for a society in transition. However, as her April 1 guest article in the New York Times, “The Clock Is Ticking for Taiwan,” makes all too clear, even celebrated prose can mislead when romanticism clouds political judgement. Lung crafts a narrative that is less an analysis of Taiwan’s geopolitical reality than an exercise in wistful nostalgia. As political scientists and international relations academics, we believe it is crucial to correct the misconceptions embedded in her article,
Strategic thinker Carl von Clausewitz has said that “war is politics by other means,” while investment guru Warren Buffett has said that “tariffs are an act of war.” Both aphorisms apply to China, which has long been engaged in a multifront political, economic and informational war against the US and the rest of the West. Kinetically also, China has launched the early stages of actual global conflict with its threats and aggressive moves against Taiwan, the Philippines and Japan, and its support for North Korea’s reckless actions against South Korea that could reignite the Korean War. Former US presidents Barack Obama
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
RSS