Former Singaporean Prime minister Lee Kuan Yew's (
Lee's visit symbolizes a showdown between two sets of values in Asia. Lee represents traditional elite authoritarianism -- along with its fear of the people and distrust of democracy. What he calls "Asian values" is echoed by other authoritarian regimes such as China, Malaysia and Myanmar, which use it as a cover for their violation of the universal values of human rights. In contrast, Taiwan has just come through a peaceful transition of political power, which marks the successful establishment of democracy in this country.
One question for the ruling and opposition parties is what stance should they take toward Lee? Should they dance along to his song of elite authoritarian politics? Or should they use the opportunity to tell Lee, in no unclear terms, not to stand on the wrong side of history?
Taiwan's message should not be merely about unification and independence, or about war and peace across the Taiwan Strait. Rather, it is about the progress of democracy in Asia, including China and Singapore. Democracy is a key to Asia's sustainable development and lasting peace. It is also a pivotal factor in post-Cold War regional order in Asia.
Taiwan's political parties need to listen for the expectations of anti-democratic forces on the issue of Taiwan. But they should also send out a message to Lee that Taiwan fully supports democracy in Asia. They should lead him out of his palace politics dark room, baptize him in democracy, and put him into a dialogue with Taiwan's pro-democracy forces. This is what Taiwan can do for human rights and democracy in Asia.
Taiwan has the responsibility to help promote democracy in Asia. Getting Lee to understand the value of democracy is perhaps the best contribution it can make to Asia.
Lai Yi-chung works for the DPP's representative office in the US.
Translated by Francis Huang
On Sunday, 13 new urgent care centers (UCC) officially began operations across the six special municipalities. The purpose of the centers — which are open from 8am to midnight on Sundays and national holidays — is to reduce congestion in hospital emergency rooms, especially during the nine-day Lunar New Year holiday next year. It remains to be seen how effective these centers would be. For one, it is difficult for people to judge for themselves whether their condition warrants visiting a major hospital or a UCC — long-term public education and health promotions are necessary. Second, many emergency departments acknowledge
US President Donald Trump’s seemingly throwaway “Taiwan is Taiwan” statement has been appearing in headlines all over the media. Although it appears to have been made in passing, the comment nevertheless reveals something about Trump’s views and his understanding of Taiwan’s situation. In line with the Taiwan Relations Act, the US and Taiwan enjoy unofficial, but close economic, cultural and national defense ties. They lack official diplomatic relations, but maintain a partnership based on shared democratic values and strategic alignment. Excluding China, Taiwan maintains a level of diplomatic relations, official or otherwise, with many nations worldwide. It can be said that
Victory in conflict requires mastery of two “balances”: First, the balance of power, and second, the balance of error, or making sure that you do not make the most mistakes, thus helping your enemy’s victory. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has made a decisive and potentially fatal error by making an enemy of the Jewish Nation, centered today in the State of Israel but historically one of the great civilizations extending back at least 3,000 years. Mind you, no Israeli leader has ever publicly declared that “China is our enemy,” but on October 28, 2025, self-described Chinese People’s Armed Police (PAP) propaganda
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) made the astonishing assertion during an interview with Germany’s Deutsche Welle, published on Friday last week, that Russian President Vladimir Putin is not a dictator. She also essentially absolved Putin of blame for initiating the war in Ukraine. Commentators have since listed the reasons that Cheng’s assertion was not only absurd, but bordered on dangerous. Her claim is certainly absurd to the extent that there is no need to discuss the substance of it: It would be far more useful to assess what drove her to make the point and stick so