Amid all the talk of a "green terror" it is wise to remember one thing: the Investigators Reform Association, which wants to get the Ministry of Justice Investigation Bureau (MJIB) out of the business of spying on political parties is not a bunch of committed liberal reformers. Most MJIB members support James Soong (
The investigators' protests have been echoed as Soong's People First Party and the KMT's Ma Ying-jeou (
One basic principle in a democracy is that people in power should not use government intelligence units to suppress domestic dissent.
Taiwan's intelligence units, which include the National Security Bureau (NSB), the MJIB, the Coast Guard Administration, the Military Police Command, the National Police Administration, and the military intelligence unit under the Ministry of National Defense, suffer from two defects. First, their missions are confused with those of law enforcement officials. Second, they are not politically neutral. Among these numerous and complex institutions, the NSB is the lead coordinator and supervisor of intelligence work. The MJIB is only an executor of NSB missions. As a criminal investigation unit, the MJIB has the power to monitor, detain and arrest people. But it also works as a political surveillance unit, collecting intelligence on domestic political issues. This confusion of law-enforcement and intelligence missions results in a situation where intelligence-gathering can easily become criminal investigation. This makes the MJIB a possible instrument of oppression to be feared.
We have seen many a struggle between justice ministers and NSB director-generals to wrest control of the MJIB. Usually, the NSB came out the winner because of its close relations with the president.
The current justice minister, Chen Ding-nan (
Taiwan's bitter post-war history contains numerous examples of the government using intelligence agencies to suppress opposition movements. Infiltration, illegal phone tapping and other similar activities have turned Taiwan's intelligence agencies into a bunch of dirty-job specialists. Part of the erstwhile ruling class, both the KMT and the PFP are well aware of the power of these agencies. Which is of course why they are so worried about it.
While the motivations behind the recent "green terror" row may not be what they seem, reforming the intelligence agencies is an important priority for the government. First of all, the MJIB's role should be clearly defined; its criminal investigation and intelligence-gathering missions should be separated. The MJIB's duties should also be clearly differentiated from those of the Criminal Investigation Bureau.
The fact that the president has direct control over intelligence units -- without any checks and balances from other organs of state -- is incompatible with democratic principles. There should be a committee in the legislature to oversee their policies and budgets. A mechanism should also be set up to allow systematic declassification of intelligence documents, so that the work of intelligence agents can be brought to light over time. Multi-faceted supervision is the only way to prevent past abuses recurring.
Apart from the first arms sales approval for Taiwan since US President Donald Trump took office, last month also witnessed another milestone for Taiwan-US relations. Trump signed the Taiwan Assurance Implementation Act into law on Tuesday. Its passing without objection in the US Senate underscores how bipartisan US support for Taiwan has evolved. The new law would further help normalize exchanges between Taiwanese and US government officials. We have already seen a flurry of visits to Washington earlier this summer, not only with Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍), but also delegations led by National Security Council Secretary-General Joseph Wu
When the towers of Wang Fuk Court turned into a seven-building inferno on Wednesday last week, killing 128 people, including a firefighter, Hong Kong officials promised investigations, pledged to review regulations and within hours issued a plan to replace bamboo scaffolding with steel. It sounded decisive. It was not. The gestures are about political optics, not accountability. The tragedy was not caused by bamboo or by outdated laws. Flame-retardant netting is already required. Under Hong Kong’s Mandatory Building Inspection Scheme — which requires buildings more than 30 years old to undergo inspection every decade and compulsory repairs — the framework for
Ho Ying-lu (何鷹鷺), a Chinese spouse who was a member of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) Central Standing Committee, on Wednesday last week resigned from the KMT, accusing the party of failing to clarify its “one China” policy. In a video released in October, Ho, wearing a T-shirt featuring a portrait of Mao Zedong (毛澤東), said she hoped that Taiwan would “soon return to the embrace of the motherland” and “quickly unify — that is my purpose and my responsibility.” The KMT’s Disciplinary Committee on Nov. 19 announced that Ho had been suspended from her position on the committee, although she was
Two mayors have invited Japanese pop icon Ayumi Hamasaki to perform in their cities after her Shanghai concert was abruptly canceled on Saturday last week, a decision widely interpreted as fallout from the latest political spat between Japan and China. Organizers in Shanghai pulled Hamasaki’s show at the last minute, citing force majeure, a justification that convinced few. The cancelation came shortly after Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi remarked that a Chinese attack on Taiwan could prompt a military response from Tokyo — comments that angered Beijing and triggered a series of retaliatory moves. Hamasaki received an immediate show of support from