Tax authorities in Taiwan are considering increases in taxes to offset over NT$10 billion in revenue losses arising from increased income tax deductions. According to an announcement by the Ministry of Finance (MOF), plans are afoot to raise taxes on foreign companies with business interests in Taiwan.
Under the new package, taxes on revenue earned by foreign companies would increase from 15 percent to 25 percent. Taxes on revenue earned for providing technical assistance to local firms would incur a levy of 6.25 percent rising from 3.75 percent, an increase of over 60 percent. New levies would also be placed on income from patent rights and royalties granted to foreign companies by their Taiwanese licensees while branchless foreign banks will lose a tax exemption on interest earned from loans extended to local firms.
Of course these actions come with a cost. First, it will make it more expensive for Taiwan firms to secure foreign loans, and it could retard improvements in manufacturing technology by slowing the importation or licensing of foreign high-tech products. Unfortunately, raising taxes might be the worst possible solution for restoring balance to the public treasury.
The singapore model
Look at Singapore, arguably the country least affected by the Asian financial crisis. It continues to look for ways to reduce the overall tax burden. In keeping with plans for greater liberalization of its financial markets, a concession on tax earned from bond trading will be extended to income derived from interest-rate and currency swaps. There will also be an expansion of exemption from withholding tax on income earned by non-residents from financial market transactions. It has also announced a cut in corporate taxes by half a percentage point even though it ended a temporary rebate on company and personal income taxes.
Consider the political costs and economic consequences of increasing the overall tax burden. It is no secret that the previous government wasted resources and misdirected public funds due to corruption and cronyism. Taking and squandering more of the hard-earned income of Taiwan's citizens would violate the mandate granted at the last election.
In the case of Japan, the imposition of a consumption tax is widely viewed as the final straw that brought on the current recession by reinforcing negative forces in its economy. And in the US, an economic slowdown brought about by higher levies cost George Bush his re-election bid when he broke his famous "no new taxes" pledge. Yet there are many better ways to reduce public-sector budget deficits that could provide larger amounts of funds more quickly or reduce outflows.
On the one hand, improving collection procedures to reduce leakages due to tax evasion can generate additional funds. On the other hand, increasing efficiency and reducing mismanagement of state companies could lighten the burden on the state treasury. A concerted effort to halt unnecessary expenditures on government schemes would be highly beneficial.
Privatizing state-owned assets would generate ready access to substantial funds. Besides an immediate injection of funds from sales, conversion to private enterprises will create new taxpayers and remove a drain on government financial resources.
Another improvement would arise from increasing user fees and prices paid to state enterprises. Note that such steps can actually decrease the overall tax burden since reductions in public subsidies would bring down the amount of tax revenues required for government operations.
An outmoded mindset
All such benefits would be net gains arising from increased efficiency that would lessen the burden on the environment because of more prudent use of natural and human resources. This is because higher prices for previously subsidized goods or services would encourage households and businesses to choose more economically. When governments fix artificially low prices, distortions are shifted to other sectors of the economy. Removal of subsidies on electricity or gasoline will benefit the environment by inducing conservation. Consumers will choose more sensible usage given their budgetary constraints.
The decision to rely upon higher taxes for deficit reduction indicates an outmoded mindset. Perhaps things might be different if political choices were made solely on the basis of equity and fairness or service to the community.
A superior approach to reducing public sector deficits is to rely upon restoring economic growth that will bring about revenue increases without imposing new taxes or increasing rates on existing levies. Globalization reveals that high economic growth is a matter of choice for policy makers.
Selecting a path of high growth requires that governments take the initiative to implement policies and support institutional arrangements that provide incentives for private entrepreneurs to undertake risks. In the end, only private sector actions can provide a sustainable source of job opportunities and additional wealth for a community. It is time to unleash more of these forces and allow greater scope for market transactions. In so doing, entrepreneurs can better discover what their fellow citizens want most on the basis of the prices they will be willing to pay.
In too many instances, raising taxes will place more money into a political culture tainted by mismanagement and corruption or a situation that might benefit more from less governmental presence in the economy. The choice of which path will bring better results should be clear.
Christopher Lingle is Global Strategist for eConoLytics.com and author of The Rise and Decline of the Asian Century. His E-mail address is: CLINGLE@eConoLytics.com.
After nine days of holidays for the Lunar New Year, government agencies and companies are to reopen for operations today, including the Legislative Yuan. Many civic groups are expected to submit their recall petitions this week, aimed at removing many Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers from their seats. Since December last year, the KMT and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) passed three controversial bills to paralyze the Constitutional Court, alter budgetary allocations and make recalling elected officials more difficult by raising the threshold. The amendments aroused public concern and discontent, sparking calls to recall KMT legislators. After KMT and TPP legislators again
Taiwan faces complex challenges like other Asia-Pacific nations, including demographic decline, income inequality and climate change. In fact, its challenges might be even more pressing. The nation struggles with rising income inequality, declining birthrates and soaring housing costs while simultaneously navigating intensifying global competition among major powers. To remain competitive in the global talent market, Taiwan has been working to create a more welcoming environment and legal framework for foreign professionals. One of the most significant steps in this direction was the enactment of the Act for the Recruitment and Employment of Foreign Professionals (外國專業人才延攬及僱用法) in 2018. Subsequent amendments in
US President Donald Trump on Saturday signed orders to impose tariffs on Canada, Mexico and China effective from today. Trump decided to slap 25 percent tariffs on goods from Mexico and Canada as well as 10 percent on those coming from China, but would only impose a 10 percent tariff on Canadian energy products, including oil and electricity. Canada and Mexico on Sunday quickly responded with retaliatory tariffs against the US, while countermeasures from China are expected soon. Nevertheless, Trump announced yesterday to delay tariffs on Mexico and Canada for a month and said he would hold further talks with
Taiwan’s undersea cables connecting it to the world were allegedly severed several times by a Chinese ship registered under a flag of convenience. As the vessel sailed, it used several different automatic identification systems (AIS) to create fake routes. That type of “shadow fleet” and “gray zone” tactics could create a security crisis in Taiwan and warrants response measures. The concept of a shadow fleet originates from the research of Elisabeth Braw, senior fellow at the Washington-based Atlantic Council. The phenomenon was initiated by authoritarian countries such as Iran, North Korea and Russia, which have been hit by international economic