Today President Chen Shui-bian (
Basking in the glory of being the first popularly-elected president, Lee visited Southeast Asia, South Africa, Cornell University and South America. Backed by Taiwan's economic and democratic accomplishments, Lee actively explored the diplomatic frontier and business investment opportunities. Although, in hindsight, these endeavors had very little to do with the fate of Taiwanese investments overseas, they boosted the moral of the people of Taiwan, while raising Taiwan's international visibility.
In the light of criticism about the timing and necessity of Chen's visit, Chen has explained that the the trip is to reciprocate the courtesy of foreign governments in sending delegations to his inauguration, as well as securing diplomatic ties. Actually, from the unstable nature of Taiwan's diplomatic ties with Panama to China's invitation to eight African countries maintaining diplomatic ties with Taiwan to join a cooperative forum, all the indications point to a major shake up in Taiwan's foreign relations.
If we do not counterattack, a domino effect will surely follow and Taiwan will lose all its foreign allies. Chen can hardly sit idly by and watch such a diplomatic crisis takes place. Therefore, he has to play his ace card to stabilize the situation. This is what makes the trip a "Herculean journey," the tough task of salvaging Taiwan's foreign ties.
Before Chen's visit, the foreign minister of Nicaragua reminded Taiwan to carry out its pledge to give US$100 million in aid, triggering heated reaction in Taiwan over "money diplomacy." The event has made Chen's difficult task all the more tricky. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs repeatedly clarified that the president's trip does not involve any plans to give new foreign aid, easing resentment about the foreign aid budget at a time when the domestic budget is tight.
Nevertheless, advanced countries see the donation of economic or humanitarian aid toward undeveloped countries as an international obligation. The US$200 million in foreign aid Taiwan contributes is about 0.07 percent of its GNP, way below the 0.24 percent that is the OECD average. Given its economic prowess, Taiwan really hasn't done as much as it should.
Also, of course, China is relentlessly squeezing Taiwan's room for diplomatic maneuver. The tactic deployed by China is what may be called "big-spender diplomacy (凱子外交)." Ambassador-at-large Loh I-cheng (陸以正) revealed that in 1965 China spent US$500 million to build a railroad for Tanzania. After its completion, very few people use this railroad which depends almost entirely on several hundred Chinese technicians for its maintenance. Now the railroad is on the verge of collapse. This is a classical example of "money diplomacy" under which aid is extended for the sake of it without any regard for reality. Given such spendthrift diplomatic competition from China, Taiwan's foreign aid pails in comparison.
Under escalating threats from China, Chen's trip is actually a response to a provocation of war. In the diplomatic tug-of-war across the Taiwan Strait, many valuable resources have been wasted. A number of countries have also exploited cross-strait competition, inviting bids from both sides and treating the two sides as "big spenders." This buying of diplomatic ties and the auctioning that has now become a feature are simply foolish. If only the two sides could agree to a cease-fire, and apply these resources to domestic development, just imagine the kind of benefits their people would enjoy.
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
They did it again. For the whole world to see: an image of a Taiwan flag crushed by an industrial press, and the horrifying warning that “it’s closer than you think.” All with the seal of authenticity that only a reputable international media outlet can give. The Economist turned what looks like a pastiche of a poster for a grim horror movie into a truth everyone can digest, accept, and use to support exactly the opinion China wants you to have: It is over and done, Taiwan is doomed. Four years after inaccurately naming Taiwan the most dangerous place on
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
RSS