While closely following the questioning of Premier Tang Fei (
The March election was a milestone in Taiwan's history, one that should have provided a turning point in the way that Taiwan is viewed abroad. It was a positive signal that the transition to democracy is complete. Yet Taiwan continues to allow itself to be represented by negative stereotypes that cast long shadows over its accomplishments.
Before Taiwan became democratized, an authoritarian government contradicted the image of "Free China." Democracy, however, has unleashed an approach to negative election campaigning that makes even the most hardened observer blush with embarrassment.
Now, as the world is watching to see how Taiwan copes with the first peaceful transition of government in Chinese history, the opposition parties in the Legislative Yuan choose to trivialize its proceedings and forgo the chance to show the international community that Taiwan knows how to manage an effective, responsible and policy-driven democracy.
The Telegraph and Argus is an evening newspaper produced six days a week in my hometown of Bradford, England. Being a local newspaper, its coverage of international news is confined to a couple of small paragraphs buried deep within its pages. Yet at regular intervals during the past decade the T&A, as it is affectionately known, has printed photographs of members of the Legislative Yuan physically attacking each other. This provides a source of amusement for readers.
I shamefully concede that the majority of my fellow Britons know only a handful of facts about Taiwan. First, it is somewhere near China. Second, that it was the main source of cheap plastic imports that flooded into the UK in the 1970s and early 1980s. Third, it is regularly subjected to threats of missile attack and invasion by Beijing; and fourth, its politicians hit each other.
The majority of the people at my hometown know nothing about the political miracle here, about the peaceful transition of government, about the vibrant democracy and dynamic economy being created. The 2000 election was headline news in the UK for one day only before the media lost interest and moved on to its next story. Coverage in 1996 was more intense, but only because the Chinese missile "tests" and the US response overshadowed the election.
How can Taiwan overcome the negative stereotypes that blight its international image? My research has focused on the work of Taiwan's representative offices throughout the world and has suggested several conclusions.
First, members of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Government Information Office stationed overseas must work much harder to engage in public relations abroad, with the emphasis on public, rather than political relations.
Second, it is imperative that they receive training in how to use and work with the media. That they do not do so already was the most surprising discovery of my research. Third, they need to avoid holding Taiwan's position within the international system responsible for all the problems they encounter and their limited successes.
Accepting the need to engage in propaganda, a neutral activity that should be devoid of moral judgement (since it is the intention of the propaganda that it important), would unleash the creativity that modern public relations and diplomacy require.
Finally, Taiwan's electorate needs to seize the initiative and demonstrate to the world community that it is capable of regulating the behavior of its elected representatives.
Take comfort from the fact that they will have to account for their actions at the next legislative election. That is democracy, and that is why it is critical for the electorate to have full access to the proceedings of the Legislature via television. Scrutiny of government actions and open accountability are the cornerstone of democracy.
Let the politicians who would make a mockery of the political process and reinforce the negative images of Taiwan know that you are watching them and judging their behavior. How much longer will you let Taiwan be a source of amusement for the international community?
Gary Rawnsley, a lecturer in politics at the University of Nottingham, UK, is a visiting scholar at the Graduate Institute of Political Science, National Sun Yat-sen University.
Having returned to the UK late last year and with a Taiwanese spouse remaining in Taiwan, I have been afforded the chance to compare and contrast the UK and Taiwanese governments’ responses to the COVID-19 crisis. My early conclusions are that Taiwan benefits from a rational, competent government, which quickly recognizes, adapts to and confronts large-scale disasters. It is led by a government that does more than just talk of respecting democracy and human rights, one that is scrutinized and responds to criticism, one that is concerned about public opinion, and one that is used to dealing with emergencies on
The “Wuhan pneumonia” outbreak has become a pandemic, but many countries have yet to come to grips with the worsening severity of this medical crisis. Historian Robert Peckham has studied how the ecology of deadly diseases has changed from the late 19th century until today and, in his 2016 book titled Epidemics in Modern Asia highlights the intrinsic link between global connectivity and emerging infections. The frequency of outbreaks — from SARS in 2003 to swine flu in 2009 and today’s COVID-19 — and their rapid rate of transmission owe much to globalization. Better and cheaper transportation and communications technology have empowered
Early last month, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Johnny Chiang (江啟臣) was elected party chairman, winning with a seven-to-three majority over pro-Beijing former Taipei mayor Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌), a two-time KMT vice chairman. Chiang’s victory has been interpreted as a generational change and the beginning of major party reform. In his inauguration speech on March 9, Chiang did not mention the so-called “1992 consensus.” Analysts believe that his most urgent task is to attract more young people to the party and win voter trust, and that he does not care about Beijing’s reaction. After joining the party chairmanship by-election, Chiang made his