In front of the eyes of their families and television audiences nationwide, four workers holding onto each other for dear life vanished in the quickly rising torrent of the Pachang Creek
The planning and implementation of Taiwan's disaster prevention and relief system did not have a legal basis until recently. After Typhoon Herb left its trail of destruction, the Executive Yuan finally sent the Disaster Prevention and Relief Bill to the Legislative Yuan. However, neither the ruling party nor the opposition parties at the time paid much attention to the bill. As a result, the government's disaster-relief, damage-reduction and reconstruction efforts were still rather chaotic after the devastating 921 earthquake.
It was no great surprise that the KMT lost votes in mid-Taiwan in the March election, as this reflected the dissatisfaction of the people in that region. Despite the mayhem caused by the 921 quake, it still took about 10 months before the Disaster Prevention and Relief Law was enacted.
The new administration's attitude has been one reason for the delay. First, the Executive Yuan refused to establish a special government entity in charge of disaster prevention and relief. Instead, it planned to assign part-time personnel, temporarily. How can you expect any success in disaster prevention and relief works -- which requires the professionalism of well-disciplined personnel -- when the central government refuses to either provide or fund the manpower? Even though a special agency was eventually established, the Executive Yuan was willing to assign just 29 staff members to handle all disasters nationwide.
Second, the Executive Yuan has retained a rather conservative view about the status of the special agency. It planned to have the National Fire Administration, an agency of the Ministry of Interior, be in charge of disaster prevention and relief work. It should go without saying that the head of a mere agency under the interior ministry would have a hard time giving orders to high-ranking officials in the Ministry of National Defense and National Police Administration.
Third, despite proposals to put a bureau in charge of disaster prevention and relief work, the Executive Yuan decided to establish a committee instead. The performance of this special agency has been less than ideal as a result.
Fourth, nuclear, biological and viral disasters were excluded from the scope of coverage by the new law. According to the Executive Yuan, the prevention and relief of these disasters requires too much professional knowledge. However, such disasters may cause greater fatalities and financial losses than other man-made or natural disasters.
But if such a disaster happens, is the government going to stand idly by? Isn't the point of enacting a new law precisely to prevent disasters from happening by reinforcing training and instruction, and gradually improving the professionalism of personnel?
The enactment of the Disaster Prevention and Relief Law did bring some hope to the people of Taiwan, despite the delays and problems. The Pachang Creek tragedy came just one month after the enactment of the law. We hope the government will deal with this tragedy sincerely and do its best to prevent more tragedies. Otherwise, people could express their dissatisfaction with their votes.
Liu Shih-wei is a researcher at the Graduate Institute of Building and Planning, National Taiwan University.
Speaking at the Copenhagen Democracy Summit on May 13, former president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) said that democracies must remain united and that “Taiwan’s security is essential to regional stability and to defending democratic values amid mounting authoritarianism.” Earlier that day, Tsai had met with a group of Danish parliamentarians led by Danish Parliament Speaker Pia Kjaersgaard, who has visited Taiwan many times, most recently in November last year, when she met with President William Lai (賴清德) at the Presidential Office. Kjaersgaard had told Lai: “I can assure you that ... you can count on us. You can count on our support
Denmark has consistently defended Greenland in light of US President Donald Trump’s interests and has provided unwavering support to Ukraine during its war with Russia. Denmark can be proud of its clear support for peoples’ democratic right to determine their own future. However, this democratic ideal completely falls apart when it comes to Taiwan — and it raises important questions about Denmark’s commitment to supporting democracies. Taiwan lives under daily military threats from China, which seeks to take over Taiwan, by force if necessary — an annexation that only a very small minority in Taiwan supports. Denmark has given China a
Many local news media over the past week have reported on Internet personality Holger Chen’s (陳之漢) first visit to China between Tuesday last week and yesterday, as remarks he made during a live stream have sparked wide discussions and strong criticism across the Taiwan Strait. Chen, better known as Kuan Chang (館長), is a former gang member turned fitness celebrity and businessman. He is known for his live streams, which are full of foul-mouthed and hypermasculine commentary. He had previously spoken out against the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and criticized Taiwanese who “enjoy the freedom in Taiwan, but want China’s money”
Last month, two major diplomatic events unfolded in Southeast Asia that suggested subtle shifts in the region’s strategic landscape. The 46th ASEAN Summit and the inaugural ASEAN-Gulf-Cooperation Council (GCC)-China Trilateral Summit in Kuala Lumpur coincided with French President Emmanuel Macron’s high-profile visits to Vietnam, Indonesia and Singapore. Together, they highlighted ASEAN’s maturing global posture, deepening regional integration and China’s intensifying efforts to recalibrate its economic diplomacy amid uncertainties posed by the US. The ASEAN summit took place amid rising protectionist policies from the US, notably sweeping tariffs on goods from Cambodia, Laos and Vietnam, with duties as high as 49 percent.
RSS