It sometimes takes a lot of faith to believe it, but most of Africa is going slowly in the right direction. Once again the pessimists have been confounded. The run up to last weekend's parliamentary election in Zimbabwe seemed to be African despotism at its worst with President Robert Mugabe blatantly calling on his supporters to "axe" opposition activists. But the heroism of the opposition leader, Morgan Tsvangirai, and his supporters paid off. Although they did not win, they secured a handsome vote that gives them a great deal of leverage in the new parliament to argue not just for political reform but for economic change, too. Tsvangirai is now well placed to topple Mugabe in the presidential election in two years.
There may not be the political "renaissance" that presidents Bill Clinton and Thabo Mbeki once spoke of. There are too many wars tearing up large swathes of the continent for that but there is a definite sense of forward momentum both on the economic and the political level.
The International Monetary Fund now expects an average growth rate in Africa of over 4 percent this year. Economic activity is rebounding in three of the largest economies, Nigeria, South Africa and Algeria. A slew of smaller countries are all expected to turn in strong performances, just as they have in recent years: Ghana, Tanzania, Tunisia, Senegal, Malawi, Botswana, Mauritania, Mauritius, Sudan, Benin, Cote D'Ivoire and Uganda. The biggest pacesetter of them all, Mozambique, which had regular annual growth rates of 10 percent or over is still recovering from last year's terrible floods, but it is already showing signs of renewed growth. Call them the African lions!
Africa is being helped along by the fair wind blowing from Europe, the major market for African countries. The general drift of the world toward increasing prosperity is also helping lift the African economies as the prices of many, but by no means all, commodities begin to rise and export opportunities open up. Oil-producing states such as Algeria and Nigeria have benefited from unusually high oil prices.
bearing fruit
Years of macroeconomic stabilization, structural adjustment and political reforms are bearing fruit. Inflation is expected to be around 6 percent or less in many countries. In South Africa the deficit has declined rapidly and interest rates have fallen.
The political map is better too than the war headlines suggest. Eight countries in Africa meet Freedom House's rigorous criteria for being totally "free" and another 24 are "partly free." But 21 remain closed dictatorships.
Nevertheless, Africa's underlying deep-rooted poverty and misery will not begin to disappear until these trends are more firmly and widely established. In Africa generally, the level of real per capita incomes is lower than it was 30 years ago. Although economists now accept there is no single formula for kick-starting growth, it is both common sense and the common consensus of economic research to conclude that there will be no progress as long as there is poor education and poor health, ineffective governance, weak rule of law and war. One should also add, that as long as the albatross of debt incurred under previous years of maladministration and short-sighted lending hangs around Africa's neck, it will sap the economic incentive to reform and grow. Progress will also not come about until the AIDS pandemic is brought under control. The one redeeming feature of the poverty statistics used to be that even in countries where income was not rising health levels and longevity were, thanks to vaccinations, improvements in water supply and hygiene. But the toll from AIDS is upsetting these gains in a number of African countries, an historical reversal no one foresaw.
repeating mistakes
This is why, belatedly -- it should have happened 20 years ago -- poverty reduction is now placed at the center of the International Monetary Fund's facility for concessional lending. Yet, foreign aid to countries with bad policies is money down a rat hole. Despite 30 years of investigation, debate and conclusion the same old mistakes are still being made. Aid to recipients who are not capable of making the investment produce a return, donor countries that favor projects that benefit their own exporters of goods and services more than the needs of the recipients and still too much spending on prestigious "white elephant" projects and military purchases.
Moreover, there is the real question: What is the point of giving aid when the industrialized countries still block the channels of trading opportunity? Agricultural subsidies to farmers in industrialized countries amount to US$360 billion a year, equal to Africa's entire national income. Europe in particular needs to reform its trade policies in areas that discriminate against Africa. There are still serious import restrictions on things that Africa could do cheaper: agricultural produce and textiles.
Moreover, these subsidies add to the downward pressure on world food prices, eroding the competitiveness of many farmers in Africa. It should not be beyond the wit of the EU to introduce new ways of supporting poorer farmers at home without exacting a cost in the global fight against poverty.
The prize-winning Nigerian novelist Ben Okri describes Africa's condition with the sharpest of words: "Everywhere there was the crudity of wounds, the stark huts, the rusted zinc abodes, the rubbish in the streets, children in rags, the little girls naked on the sand playing with crushed tin cans, the little boys jumping about uncircumcised, making machine-gun noises. The air vibrating with poisonous heat and evaporating water from filthy gutters. The sun barred the reality of our lives and everything was so harsh it was a mystery that we could understand and care for one another or anything at all."
But it doesn't have to be. Africa can progress out of its poverty. There is a way forward and, given a quarter of a chance, African men and women will fight for it, as the voters of Zimbabwe have bravely shown.
The first Donald Trump term was a boon for Taiwan. The administration regularized the arms sales process and enhanced bilateral ties. Taipei will not be so fortunate the second time around. Given recent events, Taiwan must proceed with the assumption that it cannot count on the United States to defend it — diplomatically or militarily — during the next four years. Early indications suggested otherwise. The nomination of Marco Rubio as US Secretary of State and the appointment of Mike Waltz as the national security advisor, both of whom have expressed full-throated support for Taiwan in the past, raised hopes that
There is nothing the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) could do to stop the tsunami-like mass recall campaign. KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) reportedly said the party does not exclude the option of conditionally proposing a no-confidence vote against the premier, which the party later denied. Did an “actuary” like Chu finally come around to thinking it should get tough with the ruling party? The KMT says the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is leading a minority government with only a 40 percent share of the vote. It has said that the DPP is out of touch with the electorate, has proposed a bloated
Authorities last week revoked the residency permit of a Chinese social media influencer surnamed Liu (劉), better known by her online channel name Yaya in Taiwan (亞亞在台灣), who has more than 440,000 followers online and is living in Taiwan with a marriage-based residency permit, for her “reunification by force” comments. She was asked to leave the country in 10 days. The National Immigration Agency (NIA) on Tuesday last week announced the decision, citing the influencer’s several controversial public comments, including saying that “China does not need any other reason to reunify Taiwan with force” and “why is it [China] hesitant
A media report has suggested that Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) was considering initiating a vote of no confidence in Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) in a bid to “bring down the Cabinet.” The KMT has denied that this topic was ever discussed. Why might such a move have even be considered? It would have been absurd if it had seen the light of day — potentially leading to a mass loss of legislative seats for the KMT even without the recall petitions already under way. Today the second phase of the recall movement is to begin — which has