The two Koreas yesterday announced a plan to hold a summit in Pyongyang in June. This is the greatest breakthrough in relations between North and South Korea since the end of the Korean War in 1953. It may have a significant impact on the security and the easing of tensions in Northeast Asia.
The two sides began peace talks as early as 1972 under the name of "Red Cross" talks -- about 20 years earlier than talks between China and Taiwan, which did not come sit down at the same table until 1993.
However, talks between the two Koreas came to a halt after one year. They were resumed in the mid-1980s, under the Red Cross, parliamentary and sports banners. The prime ministers from the two sides met for the first time in 1990. But progress was halted by other unexpected incidents.
A complete lack of mutual trust and sincerity has been the biggest reason why the two Koreas have so far failed in their peace talks despite their early start. What's worse, the two sides both tried to use the talks as a propaganda tool to strengthen their grip on power. South Koreans often ridicule the government's Ministry of Unification (equivalent to Taiwan's Mainland Affairs Council) as specialists in the study of "how not to unify."
Apart from political misuse, another key factor was that private-sector exchanges were not allowed to complement official contact. South Korean business tycoon Chung Ju Yung has visited the North over the past few years with official approval from the South Korean authorities, but the visits have had little impact.
The failure of almost 30 years of Korean peace talks is largely because the two sides have been less pragmatic than the Chinese across the Taiwan Strait. Even though there has been no "official contact" or "political negotiations" across the Strait, private-sector exchanges have moved forward from family reunions to the economic sphere. The first semi-official "Koo-Wang talks" began after more than six years of private-sector contact -- to resolve problems in handling these exchanges.
That the two Koreas entered into political negotiations without a solid foundation of non-official exchanges was of little help in resolving "practical" issues. Instead, the ulterior motives harbored by both sides turned the talks into mere formalities. If the two Koreas are determined to resolve their problems at their summit this time, they should learn from their past talks and developments in the Taiwan Strait and initiate private-sector exchanges.
With 13 years of experience in handling non-official exchanges across the Strait, Taiwan can provide some assistance in the Korean peace talks -- perhaps even in a mediator's role. When it comes to what can be done and what should be left alone in bilateral relations, there is much that Taiwan, China and the two Koreas can learn from each other.
Interestingly, despite its isolation from the rest of the world, North Korea has been one of the Asian countries least hostile toward Taiwan. It very much needs the "Taiwan experience" and wants to learn from Taiwan, whether in economic or political development. There is a significant role for Taiwan to play, if only China and South Korea would realize it.
Seoul and Beijing need to understand that an unstable North Korea is a major potential threat to them as well as the rest of Asia. It is the responsibility of all countries in the region to help Pyongyang out of the isolation and economic mess it is in. If Taiwan has the ability to assist Pyongyang, Seoul and Beijing should abstain from standing in the way.
US President Donald Trump last week told reporters that he had signed about 12 letters to US trading partners, which were set to be sent out yesterday, levying unilateral tariff rates of up to 70 percent from Aug. 1. However, Trump did not say which countries the letters would be sent to, nor did he discuss the specific tariff rates, reports said. The news of the tariff letters came as Washington and Hanoi reached a trade deal earlier last week to cut tariffs on Vietnamese exports to the US to 20 percent from 46 percent, making it the first Asian country
On Monday, Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) delivered a welcome speech at the ILA-ASIL Asia-Pacific Research Forum, addressing more than 50 international law experts from more than 20 countries. With an aim to refute the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) claim to be the successor to the 1945 Chinese government and its assertion that China acquired sovereignty over Taiwan, Lin articulated three key legal positions in his speech: First, the Cairo Declaration and Potsdam Declaration were not legally binding instruments and thus had no legal effect for territorial disposition. All determinations must be based on the San Francisco Peace
As things heated up in the Middle East in early June, some in the Pentagon resisted American involvement in the Israel-Iran war because it would divert American attention and resources from the real challenge: China. This was exactly wrong. Rather, bombing Iran was the best thing that could have happened for America’s Asia policy. When it came to dealing with the Iranian nuclear program, “all options are on the table” had become an American mantra over the past two decades. But the more often US administration officials insisted that military force was in the cards, the less anyone believed it. After
During an impromptu Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) rally on Tuesday last week to protest what the party called the unfairness of the judicial system, a young TPP supporter said that if Taiwan goes to war, he would “surrender to the [Chinese] People’s Liberation Army [PLA] with unyielding determination.” The rally was held after former Taipei deputy mayor Pong Cheng-sheng’s (彭振聲) wife took her life prior to Pong’s appearance in court to testify in the Core Pacific corruption case involving former Taipei mayor and TPP chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲). The TPP supporter said President William Lai (賴清德) was leading them to die on