Former Control Yuan president Chen Li-an's (
Chen spoke out his concern over the fate of the country and strongly expressed his expectations of a "no-Lee era" after the March 18 presidential election. Chen called on the public to recognize the core problem: It is Lien who is running for the presidency. However, Chen seems to overlook the essence of the problem -- if Lien is a kite that flies to the edge of the clouds, then it will be Lee who flies him to those heights.
Chen said Lee, who has a strong sense of mission, will hold on to his ideas to the last minute. What he has said, as a matter of fact, is compatible with common understanding in Taiwan society. As far as we can see, Lee is saying goodbye to his presidency, not to his power or influence. Although he is nearly 80 years of age, Lee is still healthy and sharp enough to live another decade or two. He wants to be an "elder" instructing government authorities.
Regarding cross-strait relations, Lee has insisted that the "special state-to-state relationship is the bottom line and declined to give up the "no haste, be patient" policy that runs counter to the Lien-Siew ticket's platforms.
Let's recall how Lee -- who has a strong will and has no intention of living as a "retiree" after a new president is elected -- chose his successor.
If he realizes that "every generation has its talents" and is willing to leave political life behind him, why did he choose Lien against public opinion?
Lien was selected due to his contentment with his lot, his respect for the pecking order and his honesty. Isn't Lee's way of handing over power actually a way to save a place for himself?
The Mainland Affairs Council recently made two declarations. The first is mild; the second is tough.
Premier Vincent Siew (
Power can be both visible and invisible. Lee will still be in control of the government's policies, unless he is kicked out. I assume, however, that Lien does not have the capability or guts to kick Lee out.
Chen's remarks have given Chen Shui-bian (
Indeed, some people around Lien cannot wait to see Lee step down from the political stage, which makes Lee even more vigilant. Whether that will affect his support for Lien is worth our attention.
But it is certain that the so-called "post-Lee Teng-hui era" will definitely not be "an era without Lee."
If the KMT wins the election, unless Lien undergoes an unexpected sea change, cross-strait policies will not be presided over by Lien alone.
Even if Lee's party and Lien's government do not rule the country together, Lien's government will seek harmony with the party through "negotiations."
If Chen wins the election, the KMT, which is not good at self-criticism, will not force Lee, the party chairman, to resign.
If Soong is elected, he and his followers will take over the KMT headquarters.
Chen Ro-jinn is a freelance writer.
Speaking at the Copenhagen Democracy Summit on May 13, former president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) said that democracies must remain united and that “Taiwan’s security is essential to regional stability and to defending democratic values amid mounting authoritarianism.” Earlier that day, Tsai had met with a group of Danish parliamentarians led by Danish Parliament Speaker Pia Kjaersgaard, who has visited Taiwan many times, most recently in November last year, when she met with President William Lai (賴清德) at the Presidential Office. Kjaersgaard had told Lai: “I can assure you that ... you can count on us. You can count on our support
Denmark has consistently defended Greenland in light of US President Donald Trump’s interests and has provided unwavering support to Ukraine during its war with Russia. Denmark can be proud of its clear support for peoples’ democratic right to determine their own future. However, this democratic ideal completely falls apart when it comes to Taiwan — and it raises important questions about Denmark’s commitment to supporting democracies. Taiwan lives under daily military threats from China, which seeks to take over Taiwan, by force if necessary — an annexation that only a very small minority in Taiwan supports. Denmark has given China a
Many local news media over the past week have reported on Internet personality Holger Chen’s (陳之漢) first visit to China between Tuesday last week and yesterday, as remarks he made during a live stream have sparked wide discussions and strong criticism across the Taiwan Strait. Chen, better known as Kuan Chang (館長), is a former gang member turned fitness celebrity and businessman. He is known for his live streams, which are full of foul-mouthed and hypermasculine commentary. He had previously spoken out against the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and criticized Taiwanese who “enjoy the freedom in Taiwan, but want China’s money”
Last month, two major diplomatic events unfolded in Southeast Asia that suggested subtle shifts in the region’s strategic landscape. The 46th ASEAN Summit and the inaugural ASEAN-Gulf-Cooperation Council (GCC)-China Trilateral Summit in Kuala Lumpur coincided with French President Emmanuel Macron’s high-profile visits to Vietnam, Indonesia and Singapore. Together, they highlighted ASEAN’s maturing global posture, deepening regional integration and China’s intensifying efforts to recalibrate its economic diplomacy amid uncertainties posed by the US. The ASEAN summit took place amid rising protectionist policies from the US, notably sweeping tariffs on goods from Cambodia, Laos and Vietnam, with duties as high as 49 percent.