After the release of China's white paper threatening Taiwan, Beijing's foreign ministry spokesperson Zhu Bangzao
Actually China is the one making excuses. The development of TMD will balance power in the region, which will only foster peace and security of the region.
The US' choice of words -- "rogue state" -- has made China look bad. Since everyone has been speculating about whether the US will include Taiwan in the TMD, obviously China is one of the "rogue states" referred to by the US. However, since the US did not explicitly state that China was a "rogue state," why is Beijing stamping her feet so hard over the TMD? By doing so, China has essentially publicly stated that "I am the rogue state."
Of course, China never would have agreed to the US' inclusion of Taiwan in the TMD under any circumstances, so it had to come up with such a convoluted story. In any event, China is indeed a "rogue state" in the eyes of the rest of the world. Only a rogue would release such a white paper.
China obviously intended to use the white paper to meddle in Taiwan's presidential election -- to coerce the candidates and voters to confine Taiwan's China policy within the framework set up by Beijing.
On the one hand, China talks about unification and on the other, she demands Taiwan acknowledge that it is a province under Chinese rule, totally disregarding the reality that China and Taiwan are under separate rule.
China is pressuring Taiwan because it considers itself a superpower, especially in terms population and territory. In terms of military and economic influence, it enjoys the upper hand as well. China continues to flex these muscles in a bid to drive Taiwan to the negotiating table. China exploits the US' greatest vulnerability -- the fear of war casualties -- by issuing nuclear threats against the US in an attempt to force Washington to relinquish its responsibility toward Taiwan. President Bill Clinton, by being such a pushover, has only made China more bossy than ever. Walking all over the weak is a sure sign of a rogue.
What took China by surprise, however, was that, despite Clinton's attempt to persuade the Congress to grant a permanent normal trade relationship status to China, the White House, the Congress and the Department of State reacted strongly to the white paper. Clinton even said that the US continues to reject the use of force to resolve of the Taiwan issue, and that the problems between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait must be peacefully resolved with the consent of the Taiwan people.
Public opinion in the US uniformly condemned China. Of course, the lawmakers and public sharply criticized the failure of the Clinton administration's China policy.
After her threats failed to work, China showed its timid side, a side reserved only for those more powerful than itself. On the surface, China has continued to criticize the US, but it has begun to look for a way out of the frying pan. A spokesperson for the Chinese embassy in the US immediately explained that the white paper was not an ultimatum, despite its explicit statement that if Taiwan indefinitely refuses negotiations for unification, China will use force.
A column in a Hong Kong paper which usually parrots Chinese government's views also tried to get Beijing out of a sticky situation. According to the column, China made the threat because the two sides will waste resources and manpower with their continuing military build up if unification is put off any longer.
This line of reasoning runs counter to normal logic. As long as China denounces the use of force, the two sides' military escalation will cease. China will surely resort to all her tricks to get her hands on Taiwan.
The people of Taiwan must stand together to reject China's insults and publicize Taiwan's democratic experience within China. Only an end to the one-party totalitarianism in China will secure Taiwan's safety and democracy.
The international community should also take lessons from the past. Pacifism toward militarism leads to endless troubles. Today, the international community must once again defend democratic Taiwan.
Paul Lin is a commentator on Hong Kong issues who currently resides in New York.
With escalating US-China competition and mutual distrust, the trend of supply chain “friend shoring” in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic and the fragmentation of the world into rival geopolitical blocs, many analysts and policymakers worry the world is retreating into a new cold war — a world of trade bifurcation, protectionism and deglobalization. The world is in a new cold war, said Robin Niblett, former director of the London-based think tank Chatham House. Niblett said he sees the US and China slowly reaching a modus vivendi, but it might take time. The two great powers appear to be “reversing carefully
As China steps up a campaign to diplomatically isolate and squeeze Taiwan, it has become more imperative than ever that Taipei play a greater role internationally with the support of the democratic world. To help safeguard its autonomous status, Taiwan needs to go beyond bolstering its defenses with weapons like anti-ship and anti-aircraft missiles. With the help of its international backers, it must also expand its diplomatic footprint globally. But are Taiwan’s foreign friends willing to translate their rhetoric into action by helping Taipei carve out more international space for itself? Beating back China’s effort to turn Taiwan into an international pariah
Typhoon Krathon made landfall in southwestern Taiwan last week, bringing strong winds, heavy rain and flooding, cutting power to more than 170,000 homes and water supply to more than 400,000 homes, and leading to more than 600 injuries and four deaths. Due to the typhoon, schools and offices across the nation were ordered to close for two to four days, stirring up familiar controversies over whether local governments’ decisions to call typhoon days were appropriate. The typhoon’s center made landfall in Kaohsiung’s Siaogang District (小港) at noon on Thursday, but it weakened into a tropical depression early on Friday, and its structure
Since the end of the Cold War, the US-China espionage battle has arguably become the largest on Earth. Spying on China is vital for the US, as China’s growing military and technological capabilities pose direct challenges to its interests, especially in defending Taiwan and maintaining security in the Indo-Pacific. Intelligence gathering helps the US counter Chinese aggression, stay ahead of threats and safeguard not only its own security, but also the stability of global trade routes. Unchecked Chinese expansion could destabilize the region and have far-reaching global consequences. In recent years, spying on China has become increasingly difficult for the US
RSS