The mercury has been falling in Taipei since the Lunar New Year, making everybody feel cold. Physically, we shiver and feel the chill from the low temperatures outside. Deep inside, we are feeling the cold too, as Taiwan's financial industry and the stock market continue to send out nerve-wracking news, affecting this month's presidential election.
The Central Bank of China
As for the stock market, the police recently began a surprise crack down on unlisted businesses, which halted underground transactions and prevented many investors from being able to "cash out" in time.
Some theories say a crackdown on illegal stock transactions should not have a negative impact on the stock market but should stimulate it. However, as the news of crackdown spread, the market slumped.
There is something speculative and fragile about the local stock market that was clearly evident in this incident.
An unhealthy stock market and a financial market full of landmines such as overdue loans keeps Taiwan's economy susceptible to any little disturbance. Such disturbances can bring down the stock market and cause the landmines to explode one by one, upsetting the banks.
This kind of chain reaction forces investors to try to prop up the market.
Projecting these concerns onto the March presidential election, investors want security and stability first and then the slowing down of reform. This kind of structure has been established by the ruling party over a long period of time and the market is now depending on the ruling party to bolster it.
This kind of social background is not beneficial to the reform-minded Chen Shui-bian
The main beneficiary from such an economic-political structure is Lien Chan
However, we should not exclude the possibility of James Soong
It is still hard to predict who will benefit the most from such concerns, but we can be sure that this kind of morbid structure is going to affect the election,whether or not it is reasonable or fair.
Lai Hsiang-wai is a doctoral student at the department of politics at National Chengchi University.
As China steps up a campaign to diplomatically isolate and squeeze Taiwan, it has become more imperative than ever that Taipei play a greater role internationally with the support of the democratic world. To help safeguard its autonomous status, Taiwan needs to go beyond bolstering its defenses with weapons like anti-ship and anti-aircraft missiles. With the help of its international backers, it must also expand its diplomatic footprint globally. But are Taiwan’s foreign friends willing to translate their rhetoric into action by helping Taipei carve out more international space for itself? Beating back China’s effort to turn Taiwan into an international pariah
Typhoon Krathon made landfall in southwestern Taiwan last week, bringing strong winds, heavy rain and flooding, cutting power to more than 170,000 homes and water supply to more than 400,000 homes, and leading to more than 600 injuries and four deaths. Due to the typhoon, schools and offices across the nation were ordered to close for two to four days, stirring up familiar controversies over whether local governments’ decisions to call typhoon days were appropriate. The typhoon’s center made landfall in Kaohsiung’s Siaogang District (小港) at noon on Thursday, but it weakened into a tropical depression early on Friday, and its structure
Since the end of the Cold War, the US-China espionage battle has arguably become the largest on Earth. Spying on China is vital for the US, as China’s growing military and technological capabilities pose direct challenges to its interests, especially in defending Taiwan and maintaining security in the Indo-Pacific. Intelligence gathering helps the US counter Chinese aggression, stay ahead of threats and safeguard not only its own security, but also the stability of global trade routes. Unchecked Chinese expansion could destabilize the region and have far-reaching global consequences. In recent years, spying on China has become increasingly difficult for the US
Lately, China has been inviting Taiwanese influencers to travel to China’s Xinjiang region to make films, weaving a “beautiful Xinjiang” narrative as an antidote to the international community’s criticisms by creating a Potemkin village where nothing is awry. Such manipulations appear harmless — even compelling enough for people to go there — but peeling back the shiny veneer reveals something more insidious, something that is hard to ignore. These films are not only meant to promote tourism, but also harbor a deeper level of political intentions. Xinjiang — a region of China continuously listed in global human rights reports —