The Nuclear Energy Commit-tee is considering relaxing the ban on development in areas surrounding nuclear plants, as it drafts the Nuclear Reactor Facility Control Act (
However, the focus should not be on whether the new law would bring prosperity to areas near the plants, for that would require more than simply lifting controls on land usage. The focus should be on whether the government has a policy ready to deal with the possible chain reaction that might follow enactment of the bill. If this is not done, this supposedly beneficial policy will become the root of many future evils.
As the potential hazards associated with nuclear plants are low-probability but high-impact risks, it is quite difficult to asses the actual level of danger. The ban on the development of nearby land is aimed at environmental disaster management and regulation of environmentally sensitive areas to prevent the potentially catastrophic effects of a nuclear disaster.
As the risk of a nuclear accident has not altered, why should we relax land useage regulations? Certain restrictions and conditions on development and the help of appropriate supporting measures are required. Otherwise, we would be leaving endless troubles for future generations and governments.
First, the Nuclear Energy Committee or some other organization, such as Taipower, should complete a comprehensive environmental risk evaluation based on the potential danger posed by nuclear plants. The results of the evaluation should be made public and residents from neighboring areas should be brought into discussions regarding the risks.
Residents should understand the risk of cancer and birth defects caused by living near a nuclear plant and also the risk of a nuclear explosion. Otherwise, a sudden relaxation of regulations may lead to conflict, protests and perhaps even public hygiene and other problems that the Nuclear Energy Committee would be much happier to avoid.
As for the prevention and management of the potential hazards, we need to establish a policy to spread the risks between local residents, the government and nuclear plant operators. The policy should at least include the establishment of an insurance system for environmental and nuclear hazards, as well as compensation and disaster-relief measures. Otherwise, the lifting of the ban may not only become a burden, it would be incompatible with the principles of efficiency and fairness.
Other important support measures include the establishment of an emergency disaster-relief system and a nuclear-disaster-prevention system, the improvement of the public health system, education on nuclear energy and the establishment of a government disaster-prevention system. If these systems are not adequately provided for, relaxing land use regulations would disregard the safety of the surrounding residents and expose them to heightened risk. This is truly irresponsible.
Using land surrounding nuclear plants also requires the establishment of an environmental risk management network. From the evaluation of environmental risk to the reduction of risk, from communicating the potential risks to the people to the establishment of social-relief and disaster-prevention systems, we need to have a comprehensive management policy.
Otherwise, the environmental conflict and social problems taking place after the relaxation of controls would further complicate and worsen the problems surrounding nuclear plants.
Hung Hung-chih is an associate professor of land administration at National Taipei University.
For Taipei, last year was a particularly dangerous period, with China stepping up coercive pressures on Taiwan amid signs of US President Joe Biden’s cognitive decline, which eventually led his Democratic Party to force him to abandon his re-election campaign. The political drift in the US bred uncertainty in Taiwan and elsewhere in the Indo-Pacific region about American strategic commitment and resolve. With America deeply involved in the wars in Ukraine and the Middle East, the last thing Washington wanted was a Taiwan Strait contingency, which is why Biden invested in personal diplomacy with China’s dictator Xi Jinping (習近平). The return of
The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) has long been a cornerstone of US foreign policy, advancing not only humanitarian aid but also the US’ strategic interests worldwide. The abrupt dismantling of USAID under US President Donald Trump ‘s administration represents a profound miscalculation with dire consequences for global influence, particularly in the Indo-Pacific. By withdrawing USAID’s presence, Washington is creating a vacuum that China is eager to fill, a shift that will directly weaken Taiwan’s international position while emboldening Beijing’s efforts to isolate Taipei. USAID has been a crucial player in countering China’s global expansion, particularly in regions where
Looking at the state of China’s economy this year, many experts have said that weak domestic demand and insufficient internal consumption might be its Achilles’ heel, with the latter being related to culture and demographics. Since Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) took office in 2013, he has been combating extravagance and corruption as well as rectifying a bad atmosphere. China expert Stephen Roach said the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) regulatory crackdown has been targeting Chinese tycoons, such as Alibaba Group Holding Ltd founder Jack Ma (馬雲), and opposing what the CCP defines as “excessively extravagant lifestyles,” such as playing too
With the manipulations of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), it is no surprise that this year’s budget plan would make government operations difficult. The KMT and the TPP passing malicious legislation in the past year has caused public ire to accumulate, with the pressure about to erupt like a volcano. Civic groups have successively backed recall petition drives and public consensus has reached a fever-pitch, with no let up during the long Lunar New Year holiday. The ire has even breached the mindsets of former staunch KMT and TPP supporters. Most Taiwanese have vowed to use