According to Vice President Lien Chan (
First off, the fact that Lien has chosen to attack the DPP's Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), whom he calls an adventurist who will openly seek to declare independence, and James Soong (宋楚瑜), whom he terms a "capitulationist" contemplating surrender to China, is a sign not of Lien's pursuit of a middle way between the two but rather of his desperation. It is, after all, easy to attack Chen and Soong's China policies because we know what they are. Although we were promised a policy paper from Lien's camp around Chinese New Year, we are still awaiting its appearance.
His problem is obvious. Chen and Soong have already, between them, staked out most of the conciliatory positions on cross-strait relations. Both want to get closer to China; it is simply a question of what they are prepared to sacrifice to get there. Reading between the lines of Soong's position, he seems to believe that a negotiated unification along some kind of federal model is the only option for Taiwan, and for its people to expect otherwise is unrealistic -- a sentiment widely shared by think tanks and the current administration in Washington. Chen, on the other hand, after having eschewed Taiwan independence as a formal goal, appears to be following the policy of the Mainland Affairs Council, only rather more imaginatively. That is, of seeking contact with China, and establishing enough trust at a low level to get practical matters of bilateral concern attended to without actually giving anything away on sovereignty. And both Chen and Soong have said that they would welcome talks on anything, even political matters.
Amid all this sweet reasonableness it is hard for Lien to come up with an impactful policy. Chen is now far more conciliatory than President Lee Teng-hui (
To this newspaper, however, the fact that all three candidates are fighting for the mantle of "the man who can get on best with China" is distressing. There is huge international pressure on Taiwan to talk with China, which Lee has always successfully resisted, and for which he has been called stubborn, shortsighted and a "troublemaker." But Lee understands one thing that has so far eluded the presidential candidates: however desirable the idea of lessening cross-strait tensions through talks might sound, talks are, in fact, dangerous because they eventually have to lead somewhere. And given the options that are currently open to China, limited as they are by the kind of government and political system it has and the vision of its leaders, there is almost certainly nowhere such talks could lead that Taiwan would want to go. If Lien wants a sensible cross-strait policy, therefore, he can do no better than adopt Lee's, lock stock and barrel. It is about time that somebody exposed this idea of "reducing tensions by deepening contacts" for the dangerous fallacy that it is.
For Taipei, last year was a particularly dangerous period, with China stepping up coercive pressures on Taiwan amid signs of US President Joe Biden’s cognitive decline, which eventually led his Democratic Party to force him to abandon his re-election campaign. The political drift in the US bred uncertainty in Taiwan and elsewhere in the Indo-Pacific region about American strategic commitment and resolve. With America deeply involved in the wars in Ukraine and the Middle East, the last thing Washington wanted was a Taiwan Strait contingency, which is why Biden invested in personal diplomacy with China’s dictator Xi Jinping (習近平). The return of
The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) has long been a cornerstone of US foreign policy, advancing not only humanitarian aid but also the US’ strategic interests worldwide. The abrupt dismantling of USAID under US President Donald Trump ‘s administration represents a profound miscalculation with dire consequences for global influence, particularly in the Indo-Pacific. By withdrawing USAID’s presence, Washington is creating a vacuum that China is eager to fill, a shift that will directly weaken Taiwan’s international position while emboldening Beijing’s efforts to isolate Taipei. USAID has been a crucial player in countering China’s global expansion, particularly in regions where
Looking at the state of China’s economy this year, many experts have said that weak domestic demand and insufficient internal consumption might be its Achilles’ heel, with the latter being related to culture and demographics. Since Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) took office in 2013, he has been combating extravagance and corruption as well as rectifying a bad atmosphere. China expert Stephen Roach said the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) regulatory crackdown has been targeting Chinese tycoons, such as Alibaba Group Holding Ltd founder Jack Ma (馬雲), and opposing what the CCP defines as “excessively extravagant lifestyles,” such as playing too
With the manipulations of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), it is no surprise that this year’s budget plan would make government operations difficult. The KMT and the TPP passing malicious legislation in the past year has caused public ire to accumulate, with the pressure about to erupt like a volcano. Civic groups have successively backed recall petition drives and public consensus has reached a fever-pitch, with no let up during the long Lunar New Year holiday. The ire has even breached the mindsets of former staunch KMT and TPP supporters. Most Taiwanese have vowed to use