According to Vice President Lien Chan (
First off, the fact that Lien has chosen to attack the DPP's Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), whom he calls an adventurist who will openly seek to declare independence, and James Soong (宋楚瑜), whom he terms a "capitulationist" contemplating surrender to China, is a sign not of Lien's pursuit of a middle way between the two but rather of his desperation. It is, after all, easy to attack Chen and Soong's China policies because we know what they are. Although we were promised a policy paper from Lien's camp around Chinese New Year, we are still awaiting its appearance.
His problem is obvious. Chen and Soong have already, between them, staked out most of the conciliatory positions on cross-strait relations. Both want to get closer to China; it is simply a question of what they are prepared to sacrifice to get there. Reading between the lines of Soong's position, he seems to believe that a negotiated unification along some kind of federal model is the only option for Taiwan, and for its people to expect otherwise is unrealistic -- a sentiment widely shared by think tanks and the current administration in Washington. Chen, on the other hand, after having eschewed Taiwan independence as a formal goal, appears to be following the policy of the Mainland Affairs Council, only rather more imaginatively. That is, of seeking contact with China, and establishing enough trust at a low level to get practical matters of bilateral concern attended to without actually giving anything away on sovereignty. And both Chen and Soong have said that they would welcome talks on anything, even political matters.
Amid all this sweet reasonableness it is hard for Lien to come up with an impactful policy. Chen is now far more conciliatory than President Lee Teng-hui (
To this newspaper, however, the fact that all three candidates are fighting for the mantle of "the man who can get on best with China" is distressing. There is huge international pressure on Taiwan to talk with China, which Lee has always successfully resisted, and for which he has been called stubborn, shortsighted and a "troublemaker." But Lee understands one thing that has so far eluded the presidential candidates: however desirable the idea of lessening cross-strait tensions through talks might sound, talks are, in fact, dangerous because they eventually have to lead somewhere. And given the options that are currently open to China, limited as they are by the kind of government and political system it has and the vision of its leaders, there is almost certainly nowhere such talks could lead that Taiwan would want to go. If Lien wants a sensible cross-strait policy, therefore, he can do no better than adopt Lee's, lock stock and barrel. It is about time that somebody exposed this idea of "reducing tensions by deepening contacts" for the dangerous fallacy that it is.
From the Iran war and nuclear weapons to tariffs and artificial intelligence, the agenda for this week’s Beijing summit between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) is packed. Xi would almost certainly bring up Taiwan, if only to demonstrate his inflexibility on the matter. However, no one needs to meet with Xi face-to-face to understand his stance. A visit to the National Museum of China in Beijing — in particular, the “Road to Rejuvenation” exhibition, which chronicles the rise and rule of the Chinese Communist Party — might be even more revealing. Xi took the members
A Pale View of Hills, a movie released last year, follows the story of a Japanese woman from Nagasaki who moved to Britain in the 1950s with her British husband and daughter from a previous marriage. The daughter was born at a time when memories of the US atomic bombing of Nagasaki during World War II and anxiety over the effects of nuclear radiation still haunted the community. It is a reflection on the legacy of the local and national trauma of the bombing that ended the period of Japanese militarism. A central theme of the movie is the need, at
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) on Friday used their legislative majority to push their version of a special defense budget bill to fund the purchase of US military equipment, with the combined spending capped at NT$780 billion (US$24.78 billion). The bill, which fell short of the Executive Yuan’s NT$1.25 trillion request, was passed by a 59-0 margin with 48 abstentions in the 113-seat legislature. KMT Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文), who reportedly met with TPP Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) for a private meeting before holding a joint post-vote news conference, was said to have mobilized her
Before the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA) can blockade, invade, and destroy the democracy on Taiwan, the CCP seeks to make the world an accomplice to Taiwan’s subjugation by harassing any government that confers any degree of marginal recognition, or defies the CCP’s “One China Principle” diktat that there is no free nation of Taiwan. For United States President Donald Trump’s upcoming May 14, 2026 visit to China, the CCP’s top wish has nothing to do with Trump’s ongoing dismantling of the CCP’s Axis of Evil. The CCP’s first demand is for Trump to cease US