Taiwan's future leader is going to face several unfinished reform missions: promoting democracy, carrying out public policies, establishing an environment to implement social justice and creating a stable peaceful relationship between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait in order to seek a respectable place for Taiwan.
This is exactly why all the presidential candidates need to declare their China policies now. People are looking forward to examining the various policies during the campaign.
Over the last few years people in Taiwan have reached a consensus to give top priority to the country's dignity. No one dare propose a policy that would sell out the country. Nor do many intend to be China's subjects. However, I am afraid that not many really intend to refuse to deal with China or to opt for a war at any price.
Based on these ideas, the China policies proposed by the candidates should not be very different. Since there is basically not much difference in the words, we should make our decision based on which candidate we believe will fulfill his promises.
The election may offer the people of Taiwan an opportunity to solidify a consensus on cross-strait relations.
If we then hold the same stance, how can we make the other side of the strait completely understand us? And through what kind of interaction can our stance actually be implemented?
Since this is a problem concerning the two sides of the Taiwan Strait, it will not be resolved by an one-sided domestic consensus. We should make it a cross-strait consensus. Of course, Taiwan itself needs to advance from a consensus of thought to a consensus of action.
If our thinking is far from that of the other side of the Strait, we need to make a stronger effort to shorten the distance and to have the wisdom to make a clear judgement.
Besides the campaign war of words, how will these candidates fulfill their promises? Can they really make it? In the end, the differing campaign platforms and theories proposed by the candidates don't matter much.
Chou Tien-jui is the chairman of the directors of the board at the Power News (勁報).
After nine days of holidays for the Lunar New Year, government agencies and companies are to reopen for operations today, including the Legislative Yuan. Many civic groups are expected to submit their recall petitions this week, aimed at removing many Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers from their seats. Since December last year, the KMT and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) passed three controversial bills to paralyze the Constitutional Court, alter budgetary allocations and make recalling elected officials more difficult by raising the threshold. The amendments aroused public concern and discontent, sparking calls to recall KMT legislators. After KMT and TPP legislators again
Taiwan faces complex challenges like other Asia-Pacific nations, including demographic decline, income inequality and climate change. In fact, its challenges might be even more pressing. The nation struggles with rising income inequality, declining birthrates and soaring housing costs while simultaneously navigating intensifying global competition among major powers. To remain competitive in the global talent market, Taiwan has been working to create a more welcoming environment and legal framework for foreign professionals. One of the most significant steps in this direction was the enactment of the Act for the Recruitment and Employment of Foreign Professionals (外國專業人才延攬及僱用法) in 2018. Subsequent amendments in
US President Donald Trump on Saturday signed orders to impose tariffs on Canada, Mexico and China effective from today. Trump decided to slap 25 percent tariffs on goods from Mexico and Canada as well as 10 percent on those coming from China, but would only impose a 10 percent tariff on Canadian energy products, including oil and electricity. Canada and Mexico on Sunday quickly responded with retaliatory tariffs against the US, while countermeasures from China are expected soon. Nevertheless, Trump announced yesterday to delay tariffs on Mexico and Canada for a month and said he would hold further talks with
Taiwan’s undersea cables connecting it to the world were allegedly severed several times by a Chinese ship registered under a flag of convenience. As the vessel sailed, it used several different automatic identification systems (AIS) to create fake routes. That type of “shadow fleet” and “gray zone” tactics could create a security crisis in Taiwan and warrants response measures. The concept of a shadow fleet originates from the research of Elisabeth Braw, senior fellow at the Washington-based Atlantic Council. The phenomenon was initiated by authoritarian countries such as Iran, North Korea and Russia, which have been hit by international economic