Spring is drawing near. Yet James Soong's
Soon after revelations from an independent legislator that Soong's son owns five houses in the US, the Bank of Taiwan was found to have issued massive sums in traveller's checks to Soong's secretary in late 1998. As the findings involve possible violation of the Money Laundering Control Law, Soong's case is no longer a KMT family issue.
The recent discoveries of houses and a vast amount of US dollars in traveller's checks in the names of relations and friends of Soong means not only that Soong's financial affairs are a mess, but that his political credibility is shattered. What are we to make of Taiwan's political environment when a man who might be indicted at any time on charges of possible breach of trust, tax evasion and money laundering is still leading in the opinion polls? In most developed democracies being caught lying is political death: witness the fate of Gary Hart in the US. But Soong is almost as popular as ever.
This almost certainly has something to do with his camps stonewalling on giving us the truth while pleading persecution -- what Soong calls his "one-man fight against the establishment." Soong has played around with Control Yuan members, while his camp lashed out at the "corrupt government machine misusing its power under the control of the ruling party."
Since the scandal broke on Dec. 9, Soong has come up with so many different explanations that we have lost count and many people have just switched off, being unwilling to follow the twists of the plot -- which is, of course, what Soong wants. What many people simply do not see is the way Soong has been deliberately obstructionist while pledging absolute honesty. Soong "declined" a summons from the Control Yuan on Jan. 20 and Jan. 24 to appear there to explain his affairs. Then he accused the Control Yuan of being unjust to him by planning to announce the results of its investigations without talking to him first.
After declining two requests to appear before the Control Yuan, the Soong camp used a person named Yu Shanching
For many years, the Control Yuan has been seen as an institution that "only swats flies and does not fight tigers." But accusing the Control Yuan of framing people is something rare. In this regard, Soong's counterattack requires special attention.
Soong and his family may now be indicted on a number of charges. If Soong believes the Control Yuan has been "hurried, ruthless, and incomprehensible," then he should make his move now and give the truthful public explanation of his finances that he promised in early December, but never, of course, delivered. Soong's argument seems to be that he has been framed. Ten years after martial law was lifted, in the current media environment, it is not as easy to frame people as it was when Soong himself used such techniques against others during the White Terror. Soong's persecution mania would be a joke were it now so successful a ploy. But all this could be dis-pelled if only Soong would be honest about his finances. But that, of course, is the one thing he can't be.
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
To counter the CCP’s escalating threats, Taiwan must build a national consensus and demonstrate the capability and the will to fight. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) often leans on a seductive mantra to soften its threats, such as “Chinese do not kill Chinese.” The slogan is designed to frame territorial conquest (annexation) as a domestic family matter. A look at the historical ledger reveals a different truth. For the CCP, being labeled “family” has never been a guarantee of safety; it has been the primary prerequisite for state-sanctioned slaughter. From the forced starvation of 150,000 civilians at the Siege of Changchun
The two major opposition parties, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), jointly announced on Tuesday last week that former TPP lawmaker Chang Chi-kai (張啟楷) would be their joint candidate for Chiayi mayor, following polling conducted earlier this month. It is the first case of blue-white (KMT-TPP) cooperation in selecting a joint candidate under an agreement signed by their chairpersons last month. KMT and TPP supporters have blamed their 2024 presidential election loss on failing to decide on a joint candidate, which ended in a dramatic breakdown with participants pointing fingers, calling polls unfair, sobbing and walking
In the opening remarks of her meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in the Great Hall of the People in Beijing on Friday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) framed her visit as a historic occasion. In his own remarks, Xi had also emphasized the history of the relationship between the KMT and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Where they differed was that Cheng’s account, while flawed by its omissions, at least partially corresponded to reality. The meeting was certainly historic, albeit not in the way that Cheng and Xi were signaling, and not from the perspective