During his recent visit to Taipei, US Congressman Matt Salmon urged President Lee Teng-hui (
Salmon is a man of principle and straightforward. He loves Taiwan and supports Taiwan in resisting China's pressure; he is a friend of Taiwan. Of course, as a US Congressman, he has to keep in mind the interests of the US, and we appreciate that.
However, I have to respectfully disagree with his com-ments, which seem aimed at trying to silence Taiwan on a matter of national survival. As matter of principle, Taiwan should not be silenced. On this issue, Salmon's position does not square with the fundamental values of demo-cracy. It is also unfair to the people of Taiwan.
As Lee and other ROC government officials have repeatedly explained, the Republic of China has been and continues to be a sovereign state. This is a matter of historical and legal fact.
The US government withdrew its diplomatic recognition of the ROC and refuses to consider it a sovereign country in the name of it "one China" policy. But the ROC protested and considers the action of the US as null and void. In a historical and legal sense, the ROC is a democratic sovereign state.
It is up to the US and the international community to decide if they have the courage to ignore PRC's outrageous position and recognize ROC as a sovereign nation. But it is absurd to ask Taiwan to deny itself as a sovereign state.
As a member of the House International Relations Committee, Salmon should know that if Taiwan were silent on the issue of sovereignty, it would be interpreted as acquiescence to being part of PRC in the long run. It may be annoying to some, but it is critical for Taiwan to restate its sovereignty from time to time.
Since Taiwan has consistently affirmed its status as a sovereign state, the relations between ROC and the PRC should be state to state, unless the PRC declines to be considered as a sovereign state. Undoubtedly Beijing doesn't like Taiwan's position. But it is up to them to decide whether to accept Taiwan's position, just as it is up to Taiwan to decide whether to accept the PRC's "one country, two systems" policy
As far as Taiwan is concerned, "one country, two systems" is offensive, provocative and unacceptable. But I have never heard Salmon or any US politician asking Beijing to be cautious and use restraint.
It is beyond logic to consider a statement of fact as provocative and dangerous as threat to use force to resolve differences between two sides. How can one argue that advocating peaceful co-existence and waiting to resolve differences democratically is more provocative than insisting on imposing one's rule by any means, including the use of force?
Taiwan has no reason to provoke China but has every reason to look for peaceful co-existence with Beijing. Taiwan has been restrained and cautious in trying to avoid new tensions with China. But that cannot be done and should not be done at the expense of sovereignty. On the matter of national survival, Taiwan should not be muzzled.
J.C. Sym is a Taiwanese journalist based in the US.
A return to power for former US president Donald Trump would pose grave risks to Taiwan’s security, autonomy and the broader stability of the Indo-Pacific region. The stakes have never been higher as China aggressively escalates its pressure on Taiwan, deploying economic, military and psychological tactics aimed at subjugating the nation under Beijing’s control. The US has long acted as Taiwan’s foremost security partner, a bulwark against Chinese expansionism in the region. However, a second Trump presidency could upend decades of US commitments, introducing unpredictability that could embolden Beijing and severely compromise Taiwan’s position. While president, Trump’s foreign policy reflected a transactional
There appears to be a growing view among leaders and leading thinkers in Taiwan that their words and actions have no influence over how China approaches cross-Strait relations. According to this logic, China’s actions toward Taiwan are guided by China’s unwavering ambition to assert control over Taiwan. Many also believe Beijing’s approach is influenced by China’s domestic politics. As the thinking goes, former President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) made a good faith effort to demonstrate her moderation on cross-Strait issues throughout her tenure. During her 2016 inaugural address, Tsai sent several constructive signals, including by acknowledging the historical fact of interactions and
Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) has prioritized modernizing the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to rival the US military, with many experts believing he would not act on Taiwan until the PLA is fully prepared to confront US forces. At the Chinese Communist Party’s 20th Party Congress in 2022, Xi emphasized accelerating this modernization, setting 2027 — the PLA’s centennial — as the new target, replacing the previous 2035 goal. US intelligence agencies said that Xi has directed the PLA to be ready for a potential invasion of Taiwan by 2027, although no decision on launching an attack had been made. Whether
Taiwanese men doing their alternative military service within Taipei’s and Taichung’s Department of Compulsory Military Service independently reported outlandish incidents of brainwashing. Below is a story related to propagandizing as it manifests overseas. One of my Chinese friends and a group of Taiwanese friends set off together from Sydney, Australia, in a tour group to northern Europe. The travel agency arranged for a Chinese tour guide to lead the group. The guide would start off on a propaganda blitz every afternoon at a set time, singing the praises of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). The Taiwanese members of the tour seemed