Bravo to Brian Kennedy ("Taiwan's bed is of its own making," Feb. 1, Page 8). How many times does one need to be struck on the head before rising up to self-defense? The problem is that the Taiwanese identity is muddled in a quagmire of intentional ambiguity.
Let's be blunt. Taiwan is an independent country with its own political, economic and social system. By all definitions, it is a nation, with a vibrant economic system and a stable population with its own distinct cultural and linguistic identity.
This simple fact is not recognized by the international community. Yet, who is to blame?
Some may blame the 50 years of KMT "Free China" propaganda; others say China doesn't want its "lost brethren" in Taiwan to be independent. In fact, propaganda is partly to blame, but so is the absence of objection to it. The Taiwanese need to take a much more active role and stand up for their identity.
First they need to affirm it to themselves and feel comfortable with it, without prefixes or suffixes -- not "new-Taiwanese," not "Chinese on Taiwan," nor "Taiwanese-Chinese." They are Taiwanese. Period. No explanation, no shame and no apologies. You gain respect from others only if you respect yourself.
Second, they need to realize that China or the US cannot determine the future of Taiwan, but only the people on Taiwan.
I believe that the Taiwanese want their own country, free of external influences from China. Simply put, they want independence. Yet this reality has been manipulated by all sides -- "No, Taiwan really isn't independent but it is a sovereign state so that we don't need to declare independence" or "Taiwan is not a country but it is a separate political entity" or the "the people want the status quo" (ie, a country independent of China).
Why are people so afraid of speaking the truth? There is fear of retaliation by China, but how much more political hardship could there be, with only a handful of countries recognizing the Republic of China on Taiwan and no UN membership? It is far far better to have only one country recognize the Republic of Taiwan, than it is for twenty nine countries to recognize the Republic of China on Taiwan under false pretense.
As long as the KMT government or its successors continue to pretend that Taiwan is a part of China or the "other China," Taiwan will never be considered separate, nor its people considered a distinct nationality. The "Taiwan issue" will always be viewed by the international community as an "internal affair" of China. This is self destruction.
It is humiliating to see Taiwan labeled in the international arena as either "Chinese Taipei" of "Taipei, China." People in Taiwan need to forge ahead and declare in unambiguous terms that Taiwan is not China and the Taiwanese are not Chinese.
Taiwanese hold the seeds in their pockets. It is up to them to sow their own seeds and reap the harvest. The future is now.
Gene Deune (
Baltimore, MD, USA
Taking responsibility
The credibility of all the presidential candidates has come under tough public scrutiny. James Soong (
The troubling issue surrounding the funding of his son's land deals is the possible linkage of the KMT money he mishandled when Soong deposited it in his son's name in the first place. The subsequent transfer of the tens of millions of NT dollars from Taiwan to his son's account in the US over the past years makes these land deals a legitimate concern.
Although I feel sorry for Soong's son, the public deserves clarification because it is the father who made the son's life miserable.
Please don't brush it off or sidetrack the issue, James Soong -- I believe the voters would demand the same from other presidential candidates if their credibility also came into question
James Chou
Vancouver, BC, Canada
A return to power for former US president Donald Trump would pose grave risks to Taiwan’s security, autonomy and the broader stability of the Indo-Pacific region. The stakes have never been higher as China aggressively escalates its pressure on Taiwan, deploying economic, military and psychological tactics aimed at subjugating the nation under Beijing’s control. The US has long acted as Taiwan’s foremost security partner, a bulwark against Chinese expansionism in the region. However, a second Trump presidency could upend decades of US commitments, introducing unpredictability that could embolden Beijing and severely compromise Taiwan’s position. While president, Trump’s foreign policy reflected a transactional
There appears to be a growing view among leaders and leading thinkers in Taiwan that their words and actions have no influence over how China approaches cross-Strait relations. According to this logic, China’s actions toward Taiwan are guided by China’s unwavering ambition to assert control over Taiwan. Many also believe Beijing’s approach is influenced by China’s domestic politics. As the thinking goes, former President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) made a good faith effort to demonstrate her moderation on cross-Strait issues throughout her tenure. During her 2016 inaugural address, Tsai sent several constructive signals, including by acknowledging the historical fact of interactions and
Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) has prioritized modernizing the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to rival the US military, with many experts believing he would not act on Taiwan until the PLA is fully prepared to confront US forces. At the Chinese Communist Party’s 20th Party Congress in 2022, Xi emphasized accelerating this modernization, setting 2027 — the PLA’s centennial — as the new target, replacing the previous 2035 goal. US intelligence agencies said that Xi has directed the PLA to be ready for a potential invasion of Taiwan by 2027, although no decision on launching an attack had been made. Whether
HSBC Holdings successfully fought off a breakup campaign by disgruntled Asian investors in recent years. Now, it has announced a restructuring along almost the same east-west lines. The obvious question is why? It says it is designed to create a simpler, more efficient and dynamic company. However, it looks a lot like the bank is also facing up to the political reality of the growing schism between the US and China. A new structure would not dissolve HSBC’s geopolitical challenges, but it could give the bank better options to respond quickly if things worsen. HSBC spent 2022 battling to convince shareholders of