Instead of clarifying the doubts and questions that surround his campaign, James Soong has chosen to delegate New Party lawmaker Hsieh Chi-ta to do the job on his behalf. Such a move augurs ill for the integrity he is supposed to show as a presidential candidate.
Notwithstanding her status as a former judge, Hsieh is now openly interfering in the affairs of financial institutions. If Taiwan society condones such an act, it will be a serious trampling of the rule of law.
Apart from herself, few other people believe Hsieh can be a fair third party. At the Legislative Yuan she cracked the whip on finance minister Paul Chiu for failing to maintain ?dministrative neutrality?over the Soong scandal.
Now, Hsieh herself is openly using her position as a politician to meddle in the affair.
Leading a large flock of journalists, she turned the heat on the finance ministry and the banks. It looked like she was seeking the truth about the Soong scandal, but in fact she was acting like a judge questioning a criminal ?while her every move was being broadcast live on TV.
She was in fact setting a vicious example for political interference in judicial affairs.
The Legislative Yuan's finance committee contains a good number of questionable politicians, who often try to pressure financial institutions on the sly and squeeze them for benefits. Hsieh's act yesterday was a huge encouragement to those kinds of lawmakers.
Pressuring a minister over an individual case is clearly an act designed to help Soong. It is an example of using the law as a political smoke screen. Yet Hsieh called it a crusade for justice.
The finance minister may not have done a perfect job in maintaining administrative neutrality in the Soong scandal.
However, he could not really have done much better, given the enormous political pressure placed upon him. It may not be fair to accuse him of deliberately helping the KMT obtain information that may be damaging to Soong.
In fact, the responsibility lies with the bank officials who released the information and the legislator who acquired it.
The obligation to privacy at financial institutions is indeed an important factor in the future development of the financial industry. However, there are always exceptions to this rule: the foreign banks which provided the Philippine government with information on the overseas assets of former president Ferdinand Marcos may have breached the trust of their clients. However, not providing the information may have amounted to abetting corruption.
Facing doubts and questions from all directions, Soong has misled the public with all manner of evasions and deceptions. Now, he seems to have lost the courage to face questioning eyes, as he tries to use legislators as a shield.
However, trying to divert attention and buy time will not make the questions disappear. On the contrary, such acts will only generate new problems and cost him whatever public trust he still has.
Richard Nixon left us a good lesson on the perils of dishonesty. He was not the one who directly ordered the Watergate bugging, but his long string of lies eventually cost him his integrity and the US presidency.
To solve his problems, Soong will eventually have to rely on himself. Hsieh may be able to bring him a nice Christmas gift, but not much more.
When Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) sits down with US President Donald Trump in Beijing on Thursday next week, Xi is unlikely to demand a dramatic public betrayal of Taiwan. He does not need to. Beijing’s preferred victory is smaller, quieter and in some ways far more dangerous: a subtle shift in American wording that appears technical, but carries major strategic meaning. The ask is simple: replace the longstanding US formulation that Washington “does not support Taiwan independence” with a harder one — that Washington “opposes” Taiwan independence. One word changes; a deterrence structure built over decades begins to shift.
Recently, Taipei’s streets have been plagued by the bizarre sight of rats running rampant and the city government’s countermeasures have devolved into an anti-intellectual farce. The Taipei Parks and Street Lights Office has attempted to eradicate rats by filling their burrows with polyurethane foam, seeming to believe that rats could not simply dig another path out. Meanwhile, as the nation’s capital slowly deteriorates into a rat hive, the Taipei Department of Environmental Protection has proudly pointed to the increase in the number of poisoned rats reported in February and March as a sign of success. When confronted with public concerns over young
Taipei is facing a severe rat infestation, and the city government is reportedly considering large-scale use of rodenticides as its primary control measure. However, this move could trigger an ecological disaster, including mass deaths of birds of prey. In the past, black kites, relatives of eagles, took more than three decades to return to the skies above the Taipei Basin. Taiwan’s black kite population was nearly wiped out by the combined effects of habitat destruction, pesticides and rodenticides. By 1992, fewer than 200 black kites remained on the island. Fortunately, thanks to more than 30 years of collective effort to preserve their remaining
After Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) met Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing, most headlines referred to her as the leader of the opposition in Taiwan. Is she really, though? Being the chairwoman of the KMT does not automatically translate into being the leader of the opposition in the sense that most foreign readers would understand it. “Leader of the opposition” is a very British term. It applies to the Westminster system of parliamentary democracy, and to some extent, to other democracies. If you look at the UK right now, Conservative Party head Kemi Badenoch is
RSS