"The truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth." Or so goes the pledge Americans take when they take the witness stand in court. Truth is hard to come by nowadays outside of the courts, though. Politicians are especially economical with the stuff, and have finely honed skills in deception and camouflage. But even politicians know that they don't have to fool everyone all of the time. A limited amount of carefully employed deceit is enough to get them re-elected.
Currently everyone is clamoring to find out the truth about where the money in the bank account of James Soong's (
Soong was the purveyor of lies both big and small for the KMT. When a US professor visited Taiwan in 1981 to participate in the autopsy of Professor Chen Wen-cheng (
Later, when opposition legislators criticized him for restricting the freedom of the press, Soong, in a blatant attempt to avoid the issue, started into a long, nationalistic harangue about the the humiliation that China has suffered at the hands of Western imperialist powers since the Opium War. Soong imbibed his evasion tactics at the KMT's teat.
This is not to diminish the scandal raging around Soong. The mysterious and unexplained appearance of more than US$3 million in the bank account of a senior party official would be a scandal in any democratic country.
Nor is it to be thought that this is a personal attack on Soong. There are serious questions outstanding about his integrity and he must be able to answer them if he is to be taken seriously as a political leader.
Many have questioned where the money came from, and where it went. Granted, some of the accusations may have been emotional, but they are based on rational suspicions. Nonetheless, Soong has refused to answer any questions about his conduct, shattering his carefully molded moral image into a million pieces.
The truth about the scandal will eventually see the light of day, but we feel that the scandal is not only a reflection on James Soong, but on the entire KMT. The finances of Taiwan's ruling party are a mess. If Soong's scandal hadn't been blown open, no one would have known about the whereabouts of the NT$100 million plus change that mysteriously "disappeared" from the party. This latest scandal is only one drop in the brackish pool of corruption and money politics dammed up in the KMT.
The scandal has become the turning point for the presidential elections. Soong's edge over the other candidates is fast receding, and is likely to continue to do so. But Soong could still make a positive contribution to Taiwan, if he were to drop out of the race and expose the money politics within the KMT.
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
The National Development Council (NDC) on Wednesday last week launched a six-month “digital nomad visitor visa” program, the Central News Agency (CNA) reported on Monday. The new visa is for foreign nationals from Taiwan’s list of visa-exempt countries who meet financial eligibility criteria and provide proof of work contracts, but it is not clear how it differs from other visitor visas for nationals of those countries, CNA wrote. The NDC last year said that it hoped to attract 100,000 “digital nomads,” according to the report. Interest in working remotely from abroad has significantly increased in recent years following improvements in