The illegal transfer of party-owned and state-owned assets to private hands is a common occurrence in countries when they shift from a dictatorial to a democratic system of government.
The recent money-laundering scandal in Russia is one of the more dramatic instances of the appropriation of state-owned assets in that country. Under the banner of privatization, the ruling class in Russia systematically diverted state assets to their own, or their families', private accounts, laundering their assets abroad to wipe away any trace of their actions.
Similar scams have been occurring in Taiwan over the past few years, although their operations have been much less obvious. The scandal at Taiwan Fertilizer (
Although the scandal appears complicated, it is, in fact, all very simple. Ruling groups (
The scandal at Taiwan Fertilizer is not a special case, but just one chapter in the long story of the KMT's divestiture of state assets and their unlawful appropriation of profits. The funeral of a relative of one of those involved in the scandal was virtually a ritual marking the alliance of business and government interests. Of course, those involved in the scandal denied knowing each other after the scandal was revealed in the media.
The speed of asset divestiture has increased recently as the KMT is worried it may lose its position as the ruling party in future elections. The scandal at Taiwan Fertilizer is just the tip of the iceberg, and was only exposed in the media because it involved internal power struggles within the KMT. Stay tuned for more scams.
Nan Fang Shuo is the publisher of The Journalist magazine.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Former minister of culture Lung Ying-tai (龍應台) has long wielded influence through the power of words. Her articles once served as a moral compass for a society in transition. However, as her April 1 guest article in the New York Times, “The Clock Is Ticking for Taiwan,” makes all too clear, even celebrated prose can mislead when romanticism clouds political judgement. Lung crafts a narrative that is less an analysis of Taiwan’s geopolitical reality than an exercise in wistful nostalgia. As political scientists and international relations academics, we believe it is crucial to correct the misconceptions embedded in her article,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which