The Taiwan Security Enhancement Act (TSEA) has taken its first major step toward enactment as a law of the United States, with the approval by the House of Representatives International Relations Committee. This piece of legislation, as we have argued before, holds the promise of genuine improvement in Taiwan's security, as well as helping to reduce the level of psychological insecurity felt by many Taiwanese.
Although the "wish list" of weapons sales to Taiwan has been deleted from the original draft, this is not a source of great concern. On the contrary, since the original version was probably doomed in the Senate, the alterations may well turn out to be positive for Taiwan.
This sanguine outlook is, however, based on more than political tactics. In the first place, it is to be noted that nothing in the legislative process so far inhibits any particular arms deal. Nor in fact, is it necessarily appropriate for the Congress to try to specify in so much detail exactly what weapons systems could be offered. In the longer run, there would even be a risk that the list would be used as an excuse to exclude other systems, limiting Taiwan's flexibility in procurement of new and different armaments.
Even more importantly, the rest of the draft remains completely intact, and if anything somewhat strengthened. Its provisions for greater exchanges and contacts between the military establishments of of Taiwan and the US have been retained. These measures are, in themselves, at least as valuable as new weapons systems. Top quality training and information about how to use advanced weapons and about new warfighting doctrines are vital needs for Taiwan's military, and the TSEA would facilitate this significantly. Furthermore, the requirement to make Taiwan's weapons requests -- and their outcomes -- public will increase transparency and accountability, not only in Washington, but also at home, in defense budgeting and the acquisitions process.
Naturally, the Clinton administration has vociferously opposed the TSEA. Assistant Secretary of State Stanley Roth has even sarcastically labeled it the "Taiwan Security Destabilization Act." However, although disheartening in its predictability, the noise coming from the White House is mostly bluster, a show put on for China's benefit. Obviously, what the Clinton team really wants is for the issue to go away. They desperately hope to see the TSEA die in Congress, not out of any principled objection to it -- and we would be hard pressed to imagine one -- but because they are terrified of the prospect of being put on the spot in an election year. What could be worse, from their point of view, than being forced to choose between signing the bill, and risking the condemnation of the dictators in Beijing, or vetoing it, and finding themselves belabored with the same stick that Bill Clinton used against George Bush in 1992, the charge of coddling the butchers of Beijing.
It is too early for celebration, since the TSEA is still a long way from becoming law. At the very earliest, if the House passes the bill expeditiously, the Senate might take up the matter at the beginning of next year. Taiwan, its government and its friends in the US need to redouble their joint efforts in support of the bill, as it enters its most crucial stage. Taiwan's security deserves no less.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS