I first saw Professor Liao Chung-shan (
About two years after this first meeting, I helped Professor Liao to translate a brief introduction for his book Ocean Taiwan into English. From this work I found that he had tremendous creativity and resourcefulness. He saw problems of culture and identity in Taiwan, and he thought up ways to create new solutions.
As he would say, Chinese culture is the culture of a land-locked feudal kingdom, arrogant and isolated, hierarchical and oppressive. The martial law of the Republic of China cut the people of Taiwan off from their own mountains and made them afraid of their own rivers and oceans.
Taiwanese can now realize that they are a maritime nation with the resources to communicate with and learn from the world. But to do this they must come close again to the ocean, and learn to sail and to swim. In his plan, Professor Liao likewise drew on his own technical expertise in maritime law and navigation.
He followed current events carefully and was indefatigable in writing newspaper articles that gave a sharp analysis of current events. He was vehement in denouncing opportunism in political figures of all parties.
These are the organizations and activities for which Professor Liao is known to the public. But in the last two years, I got to know him much better as a person, especially since I came to live near Liao and his wife in Chingtan, south of Hsintien. I came to regard him with great affection. Although he had the demeanor and cropped hair of a military man, Professor Liao was gentle and full of concern for others. Although his health gradually deteriorated over the last few years, this did not seem to change his cheerful disposition. Even after he was diagnosed with cancer in July, his concern was not with himself, but with national issues. On the way to the hospital one day, he told a story of political satire, and his laughter made deep creases in his cheeks. I felt that he was an inspiration to me for how to face death -- and also how to face life.
He was staying in one of the older buildings at National Taiwan University Hospital in late September. Ho Shu-yuan (
First, he said, he knew his condition was terminal and that he did not have long to live. He only hoped, he said, that he could live long enough -- to next March -- to see the KMT pulled from power. He said he hoped that the presidency would not go to James Soong (
One of those present urged Professor Liao to save his energy for his own recovery. No, he knew he would not recover, Professor Liao said firmly. For a moment he choked back tears. But he wished only to see a better future for Taiwan.
Perhaps this would have been a sad note for a would-be wedding party. But I didn't think so. I felt honored that Professor Liao had come to give to us what was most meaningful to him, his last gift to us.
I knew he could face his own death, and I am glad to have known him, not sad that he left at the age of 69.
I am 50. I only hope that I can face the conclusion of my own role in Taiwan's history with such equanimity and selflessness.
Linda Gail Arrigo is director of international affairs for Green Party Taiwan (
The Chinese government on March 29 sent shock waves through the Tibetan Buddhist community by announcing the untimely death of one of its most revered spiritual figures, Hungkar Dorje Rinpoche. His sudden passing in Vietnam raised widespread suspicion and concern among his followers, who demanded an investigation. International human rights organization Human Rights Watch joined their call and urged a thorough investigation into his death, highlighting the potential involvement of the Chinese government. At just 56 years old, Rinpoche was influential not only as a spiritual leader, but also for his steadfast efforts to preserve and promote Tibetan identity and cultural
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Former minister of culture Lung Ying-tai (龍應台) has long wielded influence through the power of words. Her articles once served as a moral compass for a society in transition. However, as her April 1 guest article in the New York Times, “The Clock Is Ticking for Taiwan,” makes all too clear, even celebrated prose can mislead when romanticism clouds political judgement. Lung crafts a narrative that is less an analysis of Taiwan’s geopolitical reality than an exercise in wistful nostalgia. As political scientists and international relations academics, we believe it is crucial to correct the misconceptions embedded in her article,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,