This week's presidential election in Indonesia may one day be remembered as a watershed in Asian history. If the forces of reform are able to change the mode of politics in Jakarta, it will mark the time when the balance of ideology shifted in the region, when the steadily increasing stirrings of democracy throughout Asia gained the upper hand against reactionary despotism.
It was not always thus. Before the Asian financial crisis, anti-democratic Asian leaders had put forward a thesis of "Asian values." This built on an earlier premise that authoritarianism was necessary for development and extended it to claim that Asians, even after gaining a measure of prosperity, would still feel that respect for individual rights and democratic governance were unnecessary imports from the West.
It is sobering to remember how well received such claims were by pundits and academics, even those from democratic countries. Those who instinctively favored universal values were branded as "cultural imperialists." The examples of democracy that could be identified in Asia -- Japan, the Philippines, Taiwan -- were all dismissed as "special cases."
A different picture has emerged today. Even before the transformation in Indonesia, many signs had pointed to the strengthening and consolidation of Asian democracy. At the height of the financial crisis, Kim Dae-Jung was elected to the South Korean presidency, taking that country's democratic evolution to the next level; in office, he is demonstrating how combatting corruption brings economic benefits. The two most democratic members of ASEAN, Thailand and the Philippines, meanwhile have begun to challenge the orthodoxy within that organization by raising concerns about governance by its newest members, Myanmar and Cambodia. Mahathir Mohamad's rule in Malaysia is facing its first serious challenge in the wake of both the economic crisis and the trial of Anwar Ibrahim. In South Asia, India's democracy continues firm; a third general election in as many years raised concerns about voter apathy, but little else. And even in Pakistan, though it still could go awry, the ouster of Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif in a coup looks likely to have the ironic effect of restoring the strength of the nation's constitution.
Indonesia now has the chance to reassert its leadership in the region. In the 1950s, Indonesia had taken a leading role in the global struggle against colonialism as a founder of the Non-aligned Movement. Now it can build on the efforts of Thailand and the Philippines and be the leader of a revitalized ASEAN that places good governance and democratic values at its core.
Adding the Northeast Asian grouping of democracies, and with South Asia continuing its forward progress, the "Asian values" argument clearly cannot be sustained. What used to appear to be a continent-wide critique of Western influence will now be exposed as a fig leaf for a shrinking number of autocracies and kleptocracies.
Especially striking is that the countries that continue to resist the trend form a distinct group. All that is left is China and its cronies -- North Korea, Myanmar and Cambodia. China was always the primary beneficiary of the "Asian values" argument, giving it a rhetorical base from which to defend itself against critiques of its human rights record. But it has let Southeast Asians do the work of propounding the theory.
In the future, the leadership of China will have to assert that it is a "special case," that something about its particular history makes democracy impracticable. Taiwan will gain added significance as the foil that defeats any ethnic rationalization. At the same time, this nation has a tremendous opportunity to deepen and strengthen its relationships with its neighbors on the basis of common values.
The 21st century may well be the Asian Century, but only if it is also the century of Asian democracy.
There are moments in history when America has turned its back on its principles and withdrawn from past commitments in service of higher goals. For example, US-Soviet Cold War competition compelled America to make a range of deals with unsavory and undemocratic figures across Latin America and Africa in service of geostrategic aims. The United States overlooked mass atrocities against the Bengali population in modern-day Bangladesh in the early 1970s in service of its tilt toward Pakistan, a relationship the Nixon administration deemed critical to its larger aims in developing relations with China. Then, of course, America switched diplomatic recognition
The international women’s soccer match between Taiwan and New Zealand at the Kaohsiung Nanzih Football Stadium, scheduled for Tuesday last week, was canceled at the last minute amid safety concerns over poor field conditions raised by the visiting team. The Football Ferns, as New Zealand’s women’s soccer team are known, had arrived in Taiwan one week earlier to prepare and soon raised their concerns. Efforts were made to improve the field, but the replacement patches of grass could not grow fast enough. The Football Ferns canceled the closed-door training match and then days later, the main event against Team Taiwan. The safety
The Chinese government on March 29 sent shock waves through the Tibetan Buddhist community by announcing the untimely death of one of its most revered spiritual figures, Hungkar Dorje Rinpoche. His sudden passing in Vietnam raised widespread suspicion and concern among his followers, who demanded an investigation. International human rights organization Human Rights Watch joined their call and urged a thorough investigation into his death, highlighting the potential involvement of the Chinese government. At just 56 years old, Rinpoche was influential not only as a spiritual leader, but also for his steadfast efforts to preserve and promote Tibetan identity and cultural
Strategic thinker Carl von Clausewitz has said that “war is politics by other means,” while investment guru Warren Buffett has said that “tariffs are an act of war.” Both aphorisms apply to China, which has long been engaged in a multifront political, economic and informational war against the US and the rest of the West. Kinetically also, China has launched the early stages of actual global conflict with its threats and aggressive moves against Taiwan, the Philippines and Japan, and its support for North Korea’s reckless actions against South Korea that could reignite the Korean War. Former US presidents Barack Obama