Five days after the 921 earthquake, President Lee Teng-hui (
After the emergency decree came into effect, the monopoly of power granted to government administrative departments has given rise to two lines of speculation:
The first is from the "anti-Lee" camp. They believe that the KMT has not ruled out postponing the election if Lien Chan's (連戰) support does not increase by next year. It is possible that the KMT may offer the reason that "the victims of the disaster have not yet been appropriately settled" as an excuse. Recently at a press conference, Lee did not clearly refute the proposition as to "whether or not the election will be postponed," simply saying that "everything is decided according to the Constitution." This made the "anti-Lee" people even more anxious and suspicious, especially when some KMT legislators and National Assembly deputies expressed support for the National Assembly term extension.
The second line of speculation comes from the DPP, which believes that the KMT intends to build a campaign stage, putting Lien in the spotlight through the emergency decree, sidelining the Legislative Yuan and the city and county governments in the process. Similarly, the so-called reconstruction efforts are in fact a disguised form of grassroots vote-buying. The Executive Yuan has not only put itself in overall charge of all reconstruction projects (including the massive funds and the bidding process), it has also bypassed the county governments to deal directly with the townships. Since the county commissioners of the disaster-stricken areas mostly belong to the DPP, and the township mayors mostly belong to the KMT, the suspicion of political motives is unavoidable.
Moreover, since Taiwan does not have an emergency decree law, DPP and New Party legislators are afraid that they will be unable to play a part in the operation of the decree, and they requested the establishment of a "post-disaster reconstruction supervisory committee" (
Speaking objectively, the first suspicion is exaggerated. After all, if President Lee intended to postpone the election, the best opportunity to make the announcement would have been earlier, when emergency rescue efforts were in full swing. Lee's vague comments at the press conference seem more likely due to poor expression rather a calculated ploy. Recently Lien publicly stated that the presidential election will be held as scheduled, which should have caused "anti-Lee phobia" to recede.
The second speculation is likely to arouse more controversy as reconstruction is carried out. On Nov. 6, there will be a by-election for the Yunlin County commissioner, in which collusion between the government and construction firms and the issue of vote-buying will definitely become the focus of struggle between the ruling party and the opposition. James Soong's (
To Lien, the emergency decree serves as an imperial scepter, freeing him from legal constraints and granting him power to act without prior consent. In order to support Lien, KMT legislators, unsurprisingly, gave up their legislative powers and voluntarily submitted to the emergency decree. The DPP knows very well that if the reconstruction funds (worth several hundreds of billions of NT dollars) are misused for vote-buying, it will have a very powerful effect on the election results. Yet given the public's expectation of "attending first to the rescue work, then the election," if there is no clear evidence showing illegal behavior to obtain political advantage, the DPP may find it extremely difficult to support its accusations and criticisms.
The use of the emergency decree has led to unfair political competition. Lien is promising relief funds everywhere and he is always the focus of media attention. It is obvious that this is the "backbone" of his campaign, despite repeated comments that "he is not in election mode." In comparison to Lien, Soong and Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) lack the resources and political office to deal effectively with matters relating to the disaster. With Lien able to be the first to respond, they can only give low-key responses if they are to avoid being criticized for "politicizing issues" or "putting up a political show." If the situation continues this way, unless the KMT or Lien make mistakes, Soong and Chen are likely to be forced behind the scenes, their only option is to wait for an opportunity to strike.
Julian Kuo is an associate professor of political science of Soochow University.
From the Iran war and nuclear weapons to tariffs and artificial intelligence, the agenda for this week’s Beijing summit between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) is packed. Xi would almost certainly bring up Taiwan, if only to demonstrate his inflexibility on the matter. However, no one needs to meet with Xi face-to-face to understand his stance. A visit to the National Museum of China in Beijing — in particular, the “Road to Rejuvenation” exhibition, which chronicles the rise and rule of the Chinese Communist Party — might be even more revealing. Xi took the members
After Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) met Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing, most headlines referred to her as the leader of the opposition in Taiwan. Is she really, though? Being the chairwoman of the KMT does not automatically translate into being the leader of the opposition in the sense that most foreign readers would understand it. “Leader of the opposition” is a very British term. It applies to the Westminster system of parliamentary democracy, and to some extent, to other democracies. If you look at the UK right now, Conservative Party head Kemi Badenoch is
A Pale View of Hills, a movie released last year, follows the story of a Japanese woman from Nagasaki who moved to Britain in the 1950s with her British husband and daughter from a previous marriage. The daughter was born at a time when memories of the US atomic bombing of Nagasaki during World War II and anxiety over the effects of nuclear radiation still haunted the community. It is a reflection on the legacy of the local and national trauma of the bombing that ended the period of Japanese militarism. A central theme of the movie is the need, at
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) on Friday used their legislative majority to push their version of a special defense budget bill to fund the purchase of US military equipment, with the combined spending capped at NT$780 billion (US$24.78 billion). The bill, which fell short of the Executive Yuan’s NT$1.25 trillion request, was passed by a 59-0 margin with 48 abstentions in the 113-seat legislature. KMT Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文), who reportedly met with TPP Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) for a private meeting before holding a joint post-vote news conference, was said to have mobilized her