The disorganized reconstruction work in the wake of the 921 earthquake has been the subject of bitter criticism. Some observers said the shambles was a result of the downsizing of the Taiwan Provincial Government. However, the real problem is not that we don't have enough levels of government, but that we have too many.
Unified administration is a key factor in the success of relief and reconstruction, and the Executive Yuan is authorized by the Constitution to take this responsibility. But Vice President Lien Chan (連戰), who has no real authority, immediately took charge of relief operations and established a relief supervision center, while Prime Minister Vincent Siew (蕭萬長) headed a reconstruction committee a few days later. Who is in charge?
And again, in just a few days, compensation payments for people killed in the 921 quake were increased from NT$500,000 to NT$1 million per person. Apparently, this was an order issued by Lien for implementation by Siew. This is not strange at all, given their positions in the KMT. The problem is what legal basis has Lien -- since President Lee Teng-hui (
Since Lee is the chairman of the KMT and Siew is Lien's running mate for the March 2000 presidential election, they both gave way to Lien, allowing him to instruct officials of the Executive Yuan. As a result, a three-level government has emerged. And if we add county (or city) and township levels, we have five levels of government. How can a "five-level" government possibly be efficient?
Although Taiwan established a semi-presidential system in the first direct presidential election held in 1996, it does not have a mechanism, such as exists under the French model, whereby a president and premier can belong to different parties, let alone one that allows for a left-right coalition. But even though Lee, Lien and Siew all belong to the same party, they maintain different opinions.
It is no wonder, therefore, that relief policies are constantly changing, making it difficult for local governments to work effectively.
In the future, once the presidential office and the Executive Yuan are controlled by different parties, or once the premier does not happen to be a vice presidential candidate, will the premier listen to the vice president?
If our political system does not take in long-term planning, then Taiwan's ability to deal with emergencies will remain paralyzed.
Lin Cho-shui is a legislator.
Speaking at the Copenhagen Democracy Summit on May 13, former president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) said that democracies must remain united and that “Taiwan’s security is essential to regional stability and to defending democratic values amid mounting authoritarianism.” Earlier that day, Tsai had met with a group of Danish parliamentarians led by Danish Parliament Speaker Pia Kjaersgaard, who has visited Taiwan many times, most recently in November last year, when she met with President William Lai (賴清德) at the Presidential Office. Kjaersgaard had told Lai: “I can assure you that ... you can count on us. You can count on our support
Denmark has consistently defended Greenland in light of US President Donald Trump’s interests and has provided unwavering support to Ukraine during its war with Russia. Denmark can be proud of its clear support for peoples’ democratic right to determine their own future. However, this democratic ideal completely falls apart when it comes to Taiwan — and it raises important questions about Denmark’s commitment to supporting democracies. Taiwan lives under daily military threats from China, which seeks to take over Taiwan, by force if necessary — an annexation that only a very small minority in Taiwan supports. Denmark has given China a
Many local news media over the past week have reported on Internet personality Holger Chen’s (陳之漢) first visit to China between Tuesday last week and yesterday, as remarks he made during a live stream have sparked wide discussions and strong criticism across the Taiwan Strait. Chen, better known as Kuan Chang (館長), is a former gang member turned fitness celebrity and businessman. He is known for his live streams, which are full of foul-mouthed and hypermasculine commentary. He had previously spoken out against the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and criticized Taiwanese who “enjoy the freedom in Taiwan, but want China’s money”
A high-school student surnamed Yang (楊) gained admissions to several prestigious medical schools recently. However, when Yang shared his “learning portfolio” on social media, he was caught exaggerating and even falsifying content, and his admissions were revoked. Now he has to take the “advanced subjects test” scheduled for next month. With his outstanding performance in the general scholastic ability test (GSAT), Yang successfully gained admissions to five prestigious medical schools. However, his university dreams have now been frustrated by the “flaws” in his learning portfolio. This is a wake-up call not only for students, but also teachers. Yang did make a big
RSS