The government's capability was greatly criticized by the public in the wake of the 921 earthquake. Although the main political leaders arrived in the disaster-stricken regions almost immediately, giving the appearance that the government was indeed prompt in its reaction, it was an event that cannot be placed on par with the Taiwan people's abundant vitality.
The situation contrasts greatly with that on the mainland.
The 50th anniversary of the People's Republic of China displayed the power of the party and state, but it was an event in which the people's vitality was not detected. To thoroughly utilize social power so as to carry out the goals of national development was once China's great achievement, but during the process, the state suppressed and throttled social vitality.
As a result, the Chinese state today is one of highly focused political power, but without the benefit of social power. Its authoritarian rule stems not from the will of the people, but from its role as a provider of national sovereignty, a functioning economy and some degree of social security.
At the present time, however -- national sovereignty aside -- serious crises exist in the industrial and financial sectors and society, in terms of public order and unemployment, not to mention environmental concerns. If China refuses to reform its political system substantially, it will certainly not be able to face the challenges of the next century.
In recent years, China has begun to allow grass-roots village and borough elections, to reinforce education ruled by law, carry out administrative reform and the training of public servants, to strengthen parliamentary functions, to ease up restraints against the expression of private political views, and prohibit those in the military from engaging in business -- to bring it back under control.
Yet these reforms, like the extinction of the foot-binding system, will only be significant under the premise that China is capable of being reformed.
If China's party power is greater than all, then there will never be a day in which the judiciary becomes independent, and so talk of real law and order will be pointless.
The grass-roots elections, controlled by the local party cadres, are a farce. If the the National People's Congress is appointed by the state, how then can parliamentary function be strengthened?
What significance can there be to the relinquishing of central power, when that power is given up to merely strengthen local party cadres?
The fact that China is afraid of reform is partially because of the fact that among themselves, there is no common consensus towards the direction that future developments should take.
And more importantly, Chinese leaders can only seek survival in conflicts where everyone lacks a sense of security, a situation in which nobody dares to make long-term commitments.
Besides, with Gorbachev's past example serving as a warning, nobody wants to take the risk of major, sweeping reforms. Premier Zhu Rongji's (
China is not a democracy and will never gravitate towards the Taiwanese political model. The state's only interaction with Taiwan is one of bullying, and its threats of military force makes China nothing more than a bandit.
Indonesia's Sukarno did not take advantage of the country's period of economic prosperity and seize the chance of political reform. When economic crisis wracked the country, its effects led to social and political unrest, ultimately forcing Sukarno out of power. But in the process, Indonesia also lost unity.
China should not waste such a similar opportunity, because if economic conditions should turn, hope for reform will become an impossibility.
Antonio Chiang is the publisher and editor in chief of the Taipei Times.
Speaking at the Copenhagen Democracy Summit on May 13, former president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) said that democracies must remain united and that “Taiwan’s security is essential to regional stability and to defending democratic values amid mounting authoritarianism.” Earlier that day, Tsai had met with a group of Danish parliamentarians led by Danish Parliament Speaker Pia Kjaersgaard, who has visited Taiwan many times, most recently in November last year, when she met with President William Lai (賴清德) at the Presidential Office. Kjaersgaard had told Lai: “I can assure you that ... you can count on us. You can count on our support
Denmark has consistently defended Greenland in light of US President Donald Trump’s interests and has provided unwavering support to Ukraine during its war with Russia. Denmark can be proud of its clear support for peoples’ democratic right to determine their own future. However, this democratic ideal completely falls apart when it comes to Taiwan — and it raises important questions about Denmark’s commitment to supporting democracies. Taiwan lives under daily military threats from China, which seeks to take over Taiwan, by force if necessary — an annexation that only a very small minority in Taiwan supports. Denmark has given China a
Many local news media over the past week have reported on Internet personality Holger Chen’s (陳之漢) first visit to China between Tuesday last week and yesterday, as remarks he made during a live stream have sparked wide discussions and strong criticism across the Taiwan Strait. Chen, better known as Kuan Chang (館長), is a former gang member turned fitness celebrity and businessman. He is known for his live streams, which are full of foul-mouthed and hypermasculine commentary. He had previously spoken out against the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and criticized Taiwanese who “enjoy the freedom in Taiwan, but want China’s money”
A high-school student surnamed Yang (楊) gained admissions to several prestigious medical schools recently. However, when Yang shared his “learning portfolio” on social media, he was caught exaggerating and even falsifying content, and his admissions were revoked. Now he has to take the “advanced subjects test” scheduled for next month. With his outstanding performance in the general scholastic ability test (GSAT), Yang successfully gained admissions to five prestigious medical schools. However, his university dreams have now been frustrated by the “flaws” in his learning portfolio. This is a wake-up call not only for students, but also teachers. Yang did make a big
RSS